Saturday, January 18, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

EU foreign policy chief: “The era of Western dominance has definitively ended”

The new multipolar world order

Published 7 March 2024
– By Editorial Staff
African Union leaders and EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell.

The European Union’s high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Josep Borrell, says that Western dominance is “definitely over” and that tensions between the EU and the Global South have been exacerbated by EU countries’ behaviour and responses to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.

– Many in the ‘Global South’ accuse us of ‘double standards’, he warns.

At the Munich security conference, EU security chief Josep Borrell highlighted four issues that he believes will be the main geopolitical focus for EU countries in the near future. Three of these were continued and increased support for Ukraine, an end to Israel’s invasion of Gaza and the need for EU countries to strengthen their defence and increase arms production.

The fourth question, however, was about the ‘Global South’ – an umbrella term that usually refers to all of Latin America, Africa, the Caribbean and parts of Oceania, as well as Asia, excluding Israel, Japan and South Korea – and how they perceive the West’s actions and reactions to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza as hypocritical and characterised by double standards.

– If the current global geopolitical tensions continue to evolve in the direction of ‘the West against the Rest’, Europe’s future risks to be bleak. The era of Western dominance has indeed definitively ended. While this has been theoretically understood, we have not always drawn all practical conclusions from this new reality, he proclaims.

“We must fight back”

– The combination of the war of aggression against Ukraine and the war in Gaza has significantly increased this risk, as we have recently seen in the Sahel and elsewhere in Africa. Many in the “Global South” accuse us of “double standards”.

Mr Borrell went on to say that Russia has managed to exploit the situation and the discontent in the South with the West – and that the issue must be given a very high priority.

We need to push back on this narrative but also to address this issue not only with words: in the coming months, we must make a massive effort to win back the trust of our partners, he declared.

The Western world’s unanimous condemnation of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the supply of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of arms to the country – while many EU countries chose to defend Israel’s far more deadly invasion and bombardment of Gaza – has been met with great scepticism and surprise in many non-European countries, and has been seen as proof that support for Ukraine is all about geopolitical interests, not the protection of international law or the lives of civilians.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Indonesia becomes the tenth BRICS member state

The new multipolar world order

Published 7 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Indonesia's president Prabowo Subianto.

Indonesia has formally joined the BRICS intergovernmental cooperation organization. This was announced by the current chair, Brazil.

As the largest economy and most populous nation in Southeast Asia, Indonesia shares with other BRICS members the support for the reform of the global governance institutions and contributes significantly to the deepening of Global South cooperation”, the Brazilian government wrote in a statement.

Priorities that align with Brazil’s theme for its presidency: ‘Enhancing Global South Cooperation for a More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance‘”, it continues.

Indonesia’s candidacy was originally approved by BRICS leaders in 2023, but the country of more than 270 million people chose to join the group only after a new national government took office.

Brics was founded in 2009 by Brazil, Russia, India and China – and South Africa joined two years later. Last year, the group was expanded to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia and the United Arab Emirates as full members – and countries such as Belarus, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Cuba, Uganda, Malaysia and Uzbekistan are expected to become official partners in 2025.

According to Russian political representatives, around 25 additional unnamed countries have expressed interest in cooperating with the BRICS group in various ways going forward.

China warns US: “A new Cold War cannot be won”

The new multipolar world order

Published 18 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
China's leader says he is ready to work with Donald Trump's administration.

During a meeting with US President Joe Biden at the APEC forum in Lima, Peru, on Saturday, Chinese President Xi Jinping laid out four areas that the US should not violate in order to maintain a balanced and sustainable relationship between the countries, while emphasizing that the US cannot win a new Cold War.

As two major countries, neither China nor the United States should seek to remodel the other according to one’s own will, suppress the other from the so-called ‘position of strength,’ or deprive the other of the legitimate right to development so as to maintain its leading status”, China’s leader declared, also warning against attempts to slow China’s economic progress.

A new Cold War should not be fought and cannot be won. Containing China is unwise, unacceptable, and bound to fail”.

Xi highlighted that it is crucial that countries treat each other as equals and respect each other’s core interests. He identified four “red lines” that China does not accept the US challenging: the issue of Taiwan, democracy and human rights, China’s political system, and its right to development and prosperity.

These are the most important guardrails and safety nets for China-US relations”, said the Chinese leader.

“Ready to work with Trump”

Jinping added that if both countries avoid “vicious competition” and instead see each other as “partner and friend”, there is potential for significant progress.

Relations between China and the US have been very strained for some time, largely linked to differing views on Taiwan’s autonomy. The United States officially recognizes Taiwan as part of China but at the same time participates in military exercises with Taiwan, provides military support and sells arms to the island state.

The meeting between Xi Jinping and Biden took place against the backdrop of past conflicts, such as the trade war during Donald Trump’s first term and Biden’s continued tariffs on Chinese goods.

“China is ready to work with the incoming government of President-elect Donald Trump”, Xi concluded.

“How to overcome Australia’s foreign policy crisis?”

The new multipolar world order

Australian society is alarmed by the continuation of the same old foreign policy strategies determined by depraved domestic and foreign actors like the US, UK, the EU, NATO and Israel and the Zionist lobby, writes Ordan Andreevski on TNT Debate.

Published 3 November 2024
The Capital Hill parliament house in Canberra, Australia.
This is an opinion piece. The author is responsible for the views expressed in the article.

The problem: There is cognitive dissonance between the launch in February 2024 in the Australian Parliament of the whole-of-nation approach to Australian foreign policy and the lived experience of most informed Australians and multicultural communities. Australian society is alarmed by the continuation of the same old foreign policy strategies determined by depraved domestic and foreign actors like the US, UK, the EU, NATO and Israel and the Zionist lobby.

The current approach to the creation of Australia’s strategic and foreign policy by the Albanese Government and the Opposition and foreign outlaw states and cartels is deeply concerning, unethical and unsustainable. In particular, to those who reject the unipolar world disorder and advocate for more nuanced and peaceful security and development architecture outside the G7.

At its basic level, the whole-of-government approach to foreign policy involves a wide network beyond government actors. These include stakeholders from civil society, business, academia, think tanks, the independent media, under represented diasporas, sports and cultural groups and state and local government engaged in international affairs.

The Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy and Defence (AP4D) Dialogue produced an excellent Options Paper which explains What does it look like for Australia to have a Whole-of-Nation Approach to International policy. It matters because we need to harness all tools of statecraft and national power such as economic, financial, industrial, scientific and informational power beyond federal government. We need to transform and significantly improve our foreign policy model and performance.

It is a systems thinking approach to creation and implementation of Australian foreign policy beyond core international policy actors in federal government and unelected oligarchs and corporate cartels from the military industrial, financial complex in Australia and the G7.

The consultation by the APFD identified many barriers in practice. These include the siloed nature of government, federalism, competing interests and perspectives, cultural barriers to public engagement in international issues, need for strong value proposition, the need for innovation of systems, mechanisms and budgets to support international policy collaboration.

The Solution: Australia needs to engage in deep and meaningful national, parliamentary and foreign policy debate on the relevance, importance and impact of the whole-of-government approach to international policy on a rotating basis. Way too little time and resources were committed to this democratic process.

Australian society must understand that we need a nuanced, open source and humanistic approach to creation and implementation of Australian foreign policy and our place in the world. We need to constantly innovate our foreign policies and strategies like we did in the 1960 – 1980 s when we rejected the White Australian policy, the Vietnam war, apartheid in South Africa and the US and the need for democratisation of policy making process from core to all key stakeholders.

We need to educate and empower all Australian citizens and under-represented communities with critical thinking skills, mobilisation and new narratives in relation to need for a new nuanced Australian foreign policy.

At the moment, Australian foreign policy is shaped by indoctrinated ideologues working in partnership with the military industrial and financial complex. Unelected oligarchs and corporate cartels must lose their dominant power, special influence and disproportionate role in shaping foreign policy. Sadly, some Australian Ministers and Shadow Ministers, federal MPs and Senators are not working in the national interest by appeasing the military industrial financial complex at great cost to our nation and regional and world peace and development.

The corporate media and oligarch think tanks in Australia are mouth pieces of the war profiteers in Wall Street and the City of London.

Our public broadcasters like the ABC and SBS also are tightly controlled by elected and unelected censors working under the control of the Five Eyes Intelligence network. As we have seen in the US and the UK, intelligence agencies, the POTUS and the US Congress are puppets of unelected oligarchs and corporate cartels producing dishonest, insane and unsustainable foreign policy determined by too few for too many.

Australia needs to develop a Foreign Policy Innovation Strategy which will deliver successful outcomes for us and the rest of the world as defined by the nation. We have talented people and communities that can make a positive and significant difference to Australia and the world. We need to be open minded and ready to use all our national power and capabilities to advance our national and international interests beyond serving as deputy Sherrif in the rapidly changing Asia-Pacific that is outperforming the G7.

We need to explore the full costs and benefits of current Australian and defence policies and outcomes and what is possible if we innovate and form coalitions outside of the G7. In particular, the BRICS+++, ASEAN, Shanghai Cooperation etc.

 

Ordan Andreevski, Advisory Board Member, Our Macedonia Australia

13 new partner countries join the BRICS cooperation

The new multipolar world order

Published 27 October 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Photo from the first plenary session of the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan.

During this year’s BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, it was decided to expand cooperation with new partner countries. Out of 30 interested nations, 13 were granted partner status, which, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, could serve as a gateway to future full membership.

The 13 new partners are Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Uzbekistan and Vietnam – countries that mainly represent regions often referred to in the BRICS cooperation as the “Global South”.

Among the partner countries, four Southeast Asian nations in particular – Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand – are now expected to strengthen their economic cooperation within the region through their partnership. Turkey and Belarus, both bordering Europe, also appear to be interesting additions to the BRICS circle, not least from a geostrategic but also, of course, an economic perspective.

The BRICS, which originally consisted of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, has grown rapidly in recent years. Earlier this year, countries such as Egypt, Ethiopia and the United Arab Emirates joined as full members. However, in June, the group decided to pause new membership applications to focus on integrating these new members. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov described the new partner country status as a potential gateway for countries to apply for full membership in the future.

No alternative payment system

The Kazan summit also discussed an alternative payment system between the BRICS countries, but this did not materialize.

– As for SWIFT or some alternatives, we have not created and are not creating any alternatives for anything, but nevertheless the issue is very important today, Putin said.

The BRICS summit also addressed a range of global issues, including economic cooperation, so-called sustainable development and local currency trade. The participation of partner countries is part of the BRICS’ stated ambition to develop a more inclusive and equitable global system and to reduce dependence on Western economic institutions.