Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Plastic waste on beaches can now be detected from space

Published 4 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
The yellow spot indicates plastic on the blue satellite image of an otherwise pristine beach.
2 minute read

Australian scientists have developed a new method of satellite technology to detect plastic litter on beaches, and the technique has already been successfully tested on a remote stretch of coastline.

Plastic pollution in the oceans is a growing problem, ranging from drifts of plastic bottles and bags to giant garbage islands like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, three times the size of France. Satellite technology is currently used to track large amounts of plastic in the ocean, but the technique is less effective on beaches where plastic debris is mixed in with the sand.

Now, researchers at RMIT University in Australia have developed a new method to better identify plastic debris on beaches. In a study published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, the method has been tested on a remote stretch of coastline.

The researchers used the Beached Plastic Debris Index (BPDI), a so-called spectral index, which is essentially a mathematical formula that sorts patterns of reflected light collected by satellites as they pass over an area. The method was adapted to map plastic debris on beaches using high-resolution data from the WorldView-3 satellite, which orbits 617 km above the Earth’s surface.

“Incredibly exciting”

To test the accuracy of the method, 14 plastic targets, each about two square meters in size, were placed on a beach in South Gippsland, Victoria. Each target was made from a different type of plastic and was smaller than the satellite pixel size of about 3 square meters. The results from the BPDI index outperformed three other established indices, which had difficulty distinguishing plastic from shadows and water.

– This is incredibly exciting, as up to now we have not had a tool for detecting plastics in coastal environments from space, said Dr. Mariela Soto-Berelov, who co-authored the study, in a press release.

Dr. Jenna Guffogg, the study’s lead author, argues that plastic on beaches can have serious consequences for wildlife and their habitats, just as it has in open waters.

Plastics can be mistaken for food, larger animals become entangled and smaller ones, like hermit crabs, become trapped inside items such as plastic containers, she says.

Guffogg adds that if the plastics are not removed, they will inevitably fragment further into micro- and nanoplastics.

– While the impacts of these ocean plastics on the environment, fishing and tourism are well documented, methods for measuring the exact scale of the issue or targeting clean-up operations, sometimes most needed in remote locations, have been held back by technological limitations, she says.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Logging in Sweden may have worsened the flood disaster

Published today 11:55
– By Editorial Staff
A freight train carrying ammunition and diesel derailed after the heavy rainfall.
2 minute read

The Swedish Forest Agency has warned for several years that logging near infrastructure increases risks during flash floods. Now an analysis shows that logging may have partially contributed to the recent disasters in Västernorrland, northern Sweden.

In recent weeks, flash floods in Västernorrland, a county in northern Sweden, have caused chaos in society. A large number of roads have been destroyed, trains carrying hazardous goods have derailed, and one person has died as a result of the disasters. In Kramfors, for example, 123.5 millimeters of rain fell in one day, which is the highest recorded in September since 1913 – according to statistics from SMHI (Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute).

One of the causes behind the chaos may be Swedish forestry, according to an analysis conducted by the Swedish Forest Agency. Two of the worst disasters in Västernorrland have occurred in areas where large amounts of forest have been logged in recent years, shows the data that Bonnier publication DN has accessed.

One disaster occurred outside Härnösand, where a man drove into a crack in a destroyed road and died. The other disaster involved a freight train that derailed in Skorped by a lake, where the train contained ammunition and diesel among other things.

The Swedish Forest Agency has warned that extensive logging can affect vital societal functions for several years, especially when it occurs on steep slopes. In several reports submitted to the Swedish government, the agency has raised this issue, but nothing has happened.

We have warned about the risks for a very long time and it seems to be exactly what we’re seeing examples of now. We need to do a proper analysis of cause and effect clearly, but based on what we know about how logging affects runoff, it looks problematic, says Anja Lomander, soil specialist at the Swedish Forest Agency.

“Must change quickly”

Forest logging can cause runoff to double during flash floods, since the trees are not there to both catch water in the tree crowns and absorb it through the roots, something that is particularly risky on steep slopes. Vehicle tracks and ditches also make it easier for water to flow down, and these types of logging operations have increased in Sweden in recent years.

Lomander believes there is a lack of both knowledge and resources in the area, and that current regulations mean the Swedish Forest Agency’s reviews of forest owners’ logging notifications are insufficient.

It must change quickly so that no more lives are lost and so that the costs to society don’t become enormous, she says.

Corona face masks – an environmental catastrophe

Published yesterday 13:36
– By Editorial Staff
During the coronavirus crisis, an estimated 129 billion face masks were used worldwide.
3 minute read

Billions of face masks were used every month during the coronavirus crisis without being properly recycled. Now researchers are warning about the microplastics and hormone-disrupting chemicals released when the masks begin to break down in nature.

During the coronavirus crisis, a large portion of the world’s population was forced to use face masks to move around in society in the belief that it would reduce the risk of infection spread, something that authorities strongly claimed despite there being very weak support for that hypothesis. In many places, children were also required to wear face masks, despite experts warning that there could be health risks for young people wearing masks for extended periods, such as oxygen deficiency and brain damage.

In many countries it was a legal requirement with fines as a consequence, while in other countries it was implemented as a strong recommendation – such as in Sweden. After the coronavirus crisis, however, it has been proposed to introduce some form of “pandemic law” in Sweden where requirements for face masks would be included.

Although washable face masks began to be sold, disposable masks were the ones used most frequently, and in some countries, such as Austria and Germany, such masks were specifically required. However, it was quickly established that these surgical masks created environmental problems – in just 14 months, the number of discarded masks in nature had increased by 9,000 percent in a number of Western countries including Sweden.

Billions of masks every month

During the coronavirus crisis, an estimated 129 billion face masks made primarily of polypropylene and other plastics were used every month worldwide. Since there has been no recycling system, most have ended up in landfills or as litter in nature, and have begun to break down.

Researchers from the University of Coventry in Britain have investigated how many substances are released from face masks in water. They did this by leaving newly purchased masks of various types, which were used during the coronavirus crisis, in purified water for 24 hours. They then filtered the liquid to see what came out.

The results, which have been published in Environmental Pollution, show that all the examined face masks released microplastics. FFP2 and FFP3 masks leaked the most – that is, the face masks that were marketed as having the best protection against infection.

Hormone-disrupting substances

What worried the researchers most, however, was that the face masks also released bisphenol B, which is a hormone-disrupting chemical. Anna Bogush, who is one of the researchers behind the study, believes that the study underscores the urgent need to reconsider how we produce, use and dispose of face masks.

We can’t ignore the environmental cost of single-use masks, especially when we know that the microplastics and chemicals they release can negatively affect both people and ecosystems, she tells The Guardian and continues:

As we move forward, it’s vital that we raise awareness of these risks, support the development of more sustainable alternatives and make informed choices to protect our health and the environment.

PFAS seep into Sweden’s farmland

Published 9 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
In Sweden, PFAS substances are primarily used to combat late blight on potatoes, against weeds, and also against insects that damage crops.
2 minute read

Last year, a record amount of pesticides containing PFAS was sold. The Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (Naturskyddsföreningen) warns that a large share of these “forever chemicals” now risks leaking into the groundwater.

Within Swedish agriculture, sales of pesticides containing forever chemicals have increased markedly in recent years, according to a compilation by the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation based on figures from the Swedish Chemicals Agency (Kemikalieinspektionen). Last year, 76 tons were sold, compared to 47 tons five years earlier.

This is a very alarming development, says Karin Lexén, Secretary General of the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, to TT.

In Sweden, 19 active substances that are PFAS are used in approved pesticides. According to the Society for Nature Conservation, the 76 tons of pesticides sold last year could result in more than 25 tons of TFA (trifluoroacetic acid) ending up in groundwater. Denmark recently decided to ban six PFAS agents in a total of 23 products, citing that they break down into TFA.

Harm to fetuses

TFA has been shown in studies to cause damage to fetuses and also affect reproductive capacity. Like many other PFAS substances, they are very difficult to break down. In Sweden, PFAS agents are primarily used to combat late blight on potatoes, against weeds, and also insects that damage crops. However, Lexén believes Sweden should follow Denmark’s example and ban TFA substances.

I understand that you need some time to adapt, but at the same time it’s incredibly alarming that sales are increasing and that we see PFAS spreading in the environment as it does. Therefore, Sweden should follow Denmark’s example, says Lexén.

The agricultural organization LRF (Federation of Swedish Farmers) argues that as long as plant protection products are approved for use in Sweden, they should be considered safe.

The only reasonable approach, as we see it, is that we follow what authorities, research and development show. As long as they say things are safe, we feel secure, says Fredrik Andersson, board member of LRF’s federal board.

Swedish moose population rises after years of decline

Biodiversity

Published 3 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
This year, 72,328 moose may be hunted in Sweden, which is an increase of just over 9,000 moose compared to last year.
2 minute read

After ten years of decline, Sweden’s moose population is increasing, according to the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). This means that more moose can be shot during this year’s moose hunting season, but despite the increase, the moose may still be red-listed as a threatened species.

In 2012, Sweden introduced new moose management policies aimed at finding compromises between different interests and setting population targets. The moose is often seen as a national symbol of Sweden and is one of the most important animals for hunting. At the same time, they cause wildlife accidents, often with fatal outcomes, and damage forests – according to SLU.

Every five years, the Species Information Centre at SLU compiles a red list of species considered threatened. SLU has also been calculating changes in the moose population since 2021. As recently as last year, researchers believed that the species had declined so significantly that it would risk being red-listed in the next compilation, scheduled for this year. This was due to the moose population decreasing in large parts of the country over the past ten years.

More hunters abstain

Now the population has increased, according to the latest report from SLU. Before last autumn’s hunt, Sweden had approximately 300,000 moose, representing an increase of about ten percent compared to the previous year.

One reason, according to the report, is that more and more hunters have refrained from shooting some of the moose they encounter. In particular, they have avoided shooting cows that are expected to give birth to next year’s calves.

– It’s naturally expected that the moose population increases if we shoot fewer moose. But it’s important to find out by how much, and to try to understand why hunters no longer seem to comply with shooting targets, says Fredrik Widemo, university lecturer at SLU and coordinator of the moose research project, in a press release.

May still be red-listed

This means that for this year’s hunt, which began this week, more moose can be shot than last year. This year, 72,328 moose may be shot in the country, an increase of just over 9,000 moose compared to last year.

Despite the increase, the moose may still be red-listed, but the preliminary proposal is to place it in the red list’s lowest category as “near threatened”.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.