Monday, March 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

“A new direction for Sweden – join the Belt and Road and leave NATO”

The new multipolar world order

China's Belt and Road Initiative, which aims to eradicate poverty through infrastructure development, is more in line with the interests of the Swedish people than NATO's war policy. It is time for Sweden and the West to wake up and join the BRI in a spirit of cooperation and friendship, writes Stephen Brawer, chairman of BRIX Sweden.

Published 18 April 2024
Stephen Brawer speaks at the Forum on Global Human Rights Governance conference in Beijing last year.
This is an opinion piece. The author is responsible for the views expressed in the article.

A new international order is emerging. The world is moving from a unipolar world order to a multipolar order in which the self-determination and sovereign interests of individual countries must be respected. This is a very positive direction for world history, because it means that the old colonial system, which has unfortunately dominated the world until today, is coming to an end. No matter how the world develops in the future, there will be no place for, and no way to return to, the old-style colonial unipolar world order.

China has played a decisive role in this, thanks to the economic development that has taken place in the country over the past 40 years. It is China and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) global development platform that has played a crucial role in realizing the new world order. At the time of writing, more than 150 countries, representing 75 percent of the world’s population and 50 percent of its economic capacity, have joined the collaboration.

The old colonial system, which has unfortunately dominated the world until today, is coming to an end.

So it is time for the West to wake up and join China’s BRI in a spirit of cooperation and friendship. But this may be easier said than done. There are forces that still defend the old unipolar world order, i.e. Anglo-American imperialist policies. They seem to prefer to risk serious conflicts and, in the worst case, a global war. If we want to avoid this, some adjustments have to be made in the way decision-makers in Western Europe, the US and the UK think and act. Joining NATO is a completely wrong decision by Sweden’s decision-makers.

When President Xi Jinping launched the BRI in 2013, it was clear that he had plans for China’s modernization and long-term economic development. Today, the country’s large population and labor force are engaged in a variety of large-scale infrastructure projects, water projects, road construction and the world’s largest manufacturing industry. China has lifted 800 million people out of extreme poverty. The transformation that China is undergoing is a unique feature of world history, unlike any other nation in history. And it will continue.

But the focus is not only internal. China is launching the BRI as a platform for infrastructure development to eradicate world poverty. But Western European politicians refuse to recognize China and the BRI as a positive basis for international cooperation. They continue to talk about trade barriers and “de-risking,” suggesting that they are unwilling to contribute to these global changes. I believe this can change, and I will work to make it happen. But whether it succeeds or not, China’s development will continue – I see no sign whatsoever that it will stop or slow down in any significant way.

The BRI means a world connected by infrastructure.

China is a brilliant model of international modernization and development for other countries in the world. It is not that other countries need to follow exactly the same recipe as China. China has its own history and civilization to build on, which is a great culture and civilization. But both in the past and in the present, it has made unique changes in development and modernization, not only in practical terms of the economy, water projects, energy and transportation, but China is now clearly becoming a leader in the research and development of fusion technology, which is the form of nuclear power that will provide virtually unlimited energy resources, and is playing a major leading role in new frontier areas such as the development of space technology.

One consequence of these advances is that the need to educate and raise the knowledge and thinking of Chinese citizens to new levels will only increase. I believe this is what makes the Chinese people happy, and I believe this kind of optimistic forward thinking can lift any nation. The idea of recognizing the pursuit of the common good as a guiding principle for the country was once fundamental to my own country, the United States. This idea was best expressed by President Lincoln as follows: Government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Unfortunately, this has not been the focus of current US policymakers since the end of World War II. But I believe we can restore this principle in the United States. When we do, the principle of representing the common good – a community for a common future for humanity – will reemerge. This is the central idea of the Belt and Road Initiative and the forward movement in China.

The idea of recognizing the pursuit of the common good as a guiding principle for the country was once fundamental to my own country, the United States.

In 2023, the BRI celebrated its 10th anniversary. The project has already had a profound impact in Africa. It is in many countries in South America. We have the connection from Kunming to Vientiane in Laos. We have the agreements between China and Indonesia, which has one of the largest populations in the world, to cooperate with the BRI. So in this relatively short period of ten years, we have seen changes in the world based on the idea of infrastructure development as a basis for poverty eradication. And there is no other way to do it.

The general failure of Western policymakers in the modern era, since World War II, but also since the 1970s and ’80s until now, under the IMF and the World Bank, has meant that development in the world has not moved forward. In fact, it has generally been prevented. So we are already seeing that the rest of the world, whether the leaders in the West like it or not, are joining the Belt and Road Initiative and cooperating with the vast majority because it will lift their nations and the world in general out of poverty.

Sweden, in my opinion, would benefit enormously from this cooperation, much more than they are currently doing by insisting on military escalation and joining NATO, which will neither help the Swedish people nor contribute to peace and development in the rest of the world. So the Belt and Road Initiative is the direction humanity needs to work in, and it is time for Western European countries to wake up and realize this.

The criticism of the BRI as a debt trap, with accusations and descriptions of debt-ridden countries cooperating with China, is mainly aimed at Western people. This kind of rumor-mongering is a propaganda tool aimed at undermining China for geopolitical reasons. Western policymakers want to defend the current unipolar order, so they want to demonize China in this way.

The Belt and Road Institute in Sweden and my colleague Hussein Askary have researched this extensively and shown that these accusations have no substance whatsoever – they are a sham. This research is documented and available on our website.

Western policymakers want to defend the current unipolar order, so they want to demonize China in this way.

In addition to the BRI, China has launched three other initiatives. The GSI – Global Security Initiative, which was submitted to the UN to promote world stability; the GDI – Global Development Initiative, to further strengthen the development direction set by the BRI; and the GCI – Global Civilization Initiative, to promote cultural exchanges. The need for stability and development is evident in the dangerous conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza; unfortunately, there is too little interest in ending the devastating consequences for the populations of these areas.

The GCI – the Global Civilization Initiative – the latest of the initiatives, I think is particularly important, and my colleague and I are now highlighting this in a series of interviews. We are talking about one of the great universal thinkers in European history, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who lived from 1646 to 1716, during the time of the Kangxi Emperor of the Qing Dynasty in China. During this time, there was an exchange between Europe and certain Jesuit missionaries who worked to share knowledge in astronomy, mathematics, and geography. Many of these missionaries adopted the ideas of Matteo Ricci. Matteo Ricci is known in China as one of the most respected Western thinkers because, in addition to being a missionary, he was fluent in written and spoken Chinese. He was admired by the leading Confucian intellectual circles in China at the time.

It is this kind of exchange that allows us to understand the deeper aspects of civilizations, both in China and in the West. It is, in my view, an important basis for overcoming political negativity, sometimes acrimonious exchanges, and arrogance by taking the thought processes back to a time and place where there was a real idea of what we have in common. We respect that there are differences, but we also see the common qualities, the respect for the common good and the goodness of human reason, which can be the bridge that reunites Europe and China in the way that Leibniz sought in his time.

I want to emphasize that these ideas are not academic, although there are many important ideas that scholars have put together that I can support and refer to. I bring this up because it is about creating a living dynamic of how we can overcome the demonization and hostility between East and West. These kinds of attitudes tend to break down communication – so we need to do the opposite.

It is about creating a living dynamic of how we can overcome the demonization and hostility between East and West.

Chinese civilization is on the verge of a historical rebirth. Those who have studied its history at all know that it is a very long and profound cultural history. China will draw on its entire history to move forward, as it has already done, and in addition to leading the unstoppable global economic development, it will pioneer space technology and new energy sources such as fusion power, which it is only a matter of time before they are commercialized.

With a greater awareness of its deep cultural history, people would not feel threatened by China – rather they would see this great civilization as a great asset.

 

Stephen Brawer,

Chairman of BRIX Sweden – The Belt and Road Institute in Sweden

BRIX Sweden - the Belt and Road Institute in Sweden, is a non-profit association founded by the organizers, speakers and participants of a seminar on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its economic and strategic importance for Europe and Sweden, which took place in Stockholm on 30 May 2018. The seminar was jointly organized by the Schiller Institute and the China-Sweden Business Council.

BRIX members include entrepreneurs, economists and strategic experts with a wide range of expertise in Swedish and Chinese economic issues. Their common conclusion is that the BRI is not only important for good economic and political relations between China and Sweden, but also fundamentally favorable for economic development and peace among all countries.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Analysis: Is Russia at risk of becoming a vassal state to China?

The new multipolar world order

In an analysis published on RT, Ivan Zuenko, senior research director at MGIMO University, argues that the two superpowers actually have great respect for each other's integrity and independence.

Published 16 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin are described as having a long-term and respectful relationship.

In some Washington circles, Moscow is seen as a potential “junior partner” that can be drawn away from Beijing’s influence. Western discourse has long painted Russia as a junior partner – even a vassal state – in relation to China.

In recent decades, ties between the two powers have strengthened markedly, especially after Western countries, seeking to isolate Russia during the Ukraine conflict, cut off economic and cultural contacts. As a result, Beijing’s role as both an economic and political ally of Moscow has increased. While differences in population size and economic capacity may seem crucial, the complex dynamics between the countries cannot be reduced to mere statistics. Russia has significant military and strategic advantages, making a subordinate position difficult to imagine.

The American view

According to US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Russia has become increasingly dependent on China – a dependence that they say risks undermining Moscow’s strategic autonomy. Some in the US interpret this as a sign that a future coalition between Moscow and Beijing could threaten Washington’s interests. Comparisons are drawn with the Nixon-era attempts to exploit the geopolitical situation in the 1970s, when a US initiative helped to open China to the West and thus strengthen the US position against the Soviet Union.

However, the historical parallel is flawed: in the 1970s, China and the Soviet Union were already in a sharp confrontation, and the current situation is characterized by the fact that neither Russia nor China is interested in distancing themselves from the United States. Instead, through its dual containment strategy, the US sees both China and Russia as potential threats – a view that many argue is more a result of US elite discourse than an objective assessment of reality.

China’s perspective

China wants to avoid a bipolar world confrontation and sees the United States’ intense efforts to contain it as a legacy of an outdated “Cold War mentality”. For Beijing, the national agenda is primarily about socio-economic development, where foreign policy is seen as a tool rather than an end in itself. In this context, Russia is not seen as a submissive partner, but as a strategic player with significant military and geopolitical resources.

By leveraging Russia’s energy and transit capabilities, China can secure key raw materials while maintaining good relations with other global players, including the United States and Western countries. Too close a relationship with Moscow would risk jeopardizing these relations, which China is prepared to avoid. Beijing’s strategy is therefore characterized by maintaining a balanced relationship with Russia – a cooperation based on mutual benefit rather than hierarchical subordination.

Conclusion

Reducing the Russia-China relationship to a simple narrative of Western dependence and subservience misses the complex reality. Both Moscow and Beijing cherish their strategic autonomy and prefer pragmatic cooperation to a relationship characterized by hierarchy. The US fear of Russia falling under China’s influence rather reflects its own desire to redefine the global balance of power.

If the US could let go of its need to act as the world’s moral compass, and instead focus on raising the living standards of its citizens, a more nuanced understanding of international relations could emerge – one in which major powers cooperate on equal terms without imposing roles of subordination or superiority on each other.

A longer analysis article by Zuenko has been published on RT.

Munich organizer in tears – Vance criticized EU elite

Donald Trump's USA

Published 18 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff
JD Vance's speech is considered by many analysts to be a historic milestone. Organizer Christoph Heusgen broke down in tears during his closing remarks.

JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference on Friday became the major global political talking point of the weekend.

After the US vice-president accused the European establishment of undermining democracy and freedom of expression, the conference chairman, Christopher Heusgen, could not hold back his tears.

Heusgen’s breakdown came in front of the European political establishment after he referred to Vance’s speech, in which the US Vice President criticized, among other things, the annulment of elections by EU leaders in member states, the Union’s increasingly totalitarian tendencies and politicians’ growing fear of their own voters.

After the speech of Vice President Vance on Friday, we have to fear that our common value base are not so common anymore, said an emotionally shaken Heusgen, who appealed to European leaders to “reaffirm  the values and principles they defend”, which he said Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyj had done better than anyone else.

– I am very grateful to all those European politicians who stood up and reaffirmed the values and principles they are defending. No one did this better than President Zelensky, he continued.

But as he neared the end of his speech, he couldn’t hold back the tears any longer and started to sob out the words:

– Let me conclude… this will be difficult…

The hall was filled with applause of sympathy, with one female conference participant taking the crying Heusgen in her arms.

Organizers of Munich Security Conference firmly deny in a public statement that Heusgen started crying out of frustration after Vance’s speech – instead, they claim that the tears were due to his resignation as chairman of the power forum, with emotions taking over.

Vance’s speech shakes up the EU elite

During his speech on Friday, JD Vance condemned the EU leaders’ handling of democracy and freedom of expression, saying the biggest threat to the continent is that Europe is abandoning its own fundamental values.

He cited the recent annulment of a presidential election by the Romanian government, supported by former European Commissioner Thierry Breton, who has also hinted that the German elections could be annulled if Alternative for Germany wins.

– We’ve been told that everything we fund and support is in the name of our shared democratic values. But when we see European courts canceling elections and senior officials threatening to cancel others, we ought to ask whether we’re holding ourselves to an appropriately high standard, said the US Vice President.

– If your democracy can be destroyed with a few hundred thousand dollars of digital advertising from a foreign country, then it wasn’t very strong to begin with, he continued.

Vance also highlighted how the EU continues to push for digital censorship, threatening to shut down social media that publish supposed “disinformation”  a rhetoric he compared to that of the former communist Eastern bloc.

– I look to Brussels, where EU commissars warn citizens that they intend to shut down social media during times of civil unrest the moment they spot what they’ve judged to be, quote, “hateful content”.

He also touched on Sweden’s verdict against the murdered Iraqi Koran burner Salwan Momika’s colleague who was convicted of participating in the actions.

– As the judge in his case chillingly noted, Sweden’s laws to supposedly protect free expression do not, in fact, grant, and I’m quoting, “a free pass to do or say anything without risking offending the group that holds that belief”.

Met with AfD leader condemned the “firewall policy” against the party

During his stay in Munich, Vance also met AfD leader Alice Weidel for a brief meeting in a discussion that centered on Ukraine, German domestic politics and freedom of expression.

One of the issues raised was the so-called “Brandmauer” strategy, a term for the refusal of established German parties to cooperate with the increasingly successful opposition AfD, which has now become the second largest party in the country according to opinion polls ahead of the German parliamentary elections on February 23. Vance has previously criticized the so-called firewall policy, saying it goes against democratic principles.


The same conference where Putin became a pariah

The Munich Security Conference has long been known for bringing together high-profile leaders. It was also here, at the 2007 conference, that Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered his famous speech rejecting what he described as the “unipolar world order”, with clear warnings that the US’s growing disregard for the security interests of other countries could lead to devastating consequences in the long run.

The speech has since been described as a watershed moment as Putin would be labeled a pariah by the US-led Western bloc power establishment.

The miracle in the land of the Savior

The new multipolar world order

In just a few years, El Salvador defeated the brutal gang crime that had plagued the country for decades. President Nayib Bukele has been accused of being “undemocratic” by his globalist opponents, but among Salvadorans themselves he has achieved near-heroic status and is now spearheading a Bitcoin revolution.

Published 2 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff

El Salvador, literally “the Savior” or in other words “the land of the Savior”, formally became an independent country in 1842. The liberation of the Latin American country came after a civil war in the relatively newly formed country of the Central American Federation, which in 1823 had freed itself from the Mexican Empire, a Mexico that just two years earlier, in 1821, had proclaimed its independence from the Spanish crown.

Despite its name, the tiny nation would have to wait patiently for its salvation. El Salvador would come to be dominated by corrupt forces and has been known more than any other in modern times as part of Central America’s so-called “banana republics”, not only because of the presence of US-based corporate giants where the country went so far as to adopt the US dollar as its own currency, but also because El Salvador has long been known as a particular den of brutal and literally devil-worshipping criminal gangs, such as MS-13 and Barrio 18, which still have a strong presence even in the organized crime world.

Before that, the country was mainly associated with the protracted civil war that raged there for 13 long years between 1979 and 1992 in one of the many Cold War proxy conflicts between pro-American and pro-Soviet forces in the country.

Two years after the outbreak of the Salvadoran civil war, Nayib Bukele was born in 1981 in the capital, San Salvador. His father, Armando Bukele Kattán, was a prominent Palestinian businessman and Muslim leader who arranged for his first-born son to study law at the Central American University in El Salvador. Nayib never completed his degree, however, and instead went into business. According to him, this experience would allow him to develop two skills that he later described as crucial to his political career – communicating and leading with clarity.

Bukeles’ political career began in earnest in 2012 when he was elected mayor of Nuevo Cuscatlán, a small municipality outside the capital San Salvador. His successes there – including economic reforms and social programs – led him to become mayor of the capital San Salvador in 2015. During this time, he distinguished himself as a simultaneously pragmatic, outspoken and visionary leader.

Despite the enormous risks involved in challenging the political establishment, which was completely infested by the tentacles of gang crime, Bukele came to increasingly openly criticize them for destroying the country and for betraying their voters.

Bukele meets the people.

In 2017, Bukele was expelled from his then-party, the FMLN, following internal conflicts, and founded his own party, Nuevas Ideas, which would become the platform for his daring campaign to run for president on a message of renewal and modernization. Despite difficult obstacles put in his way by political opponents, Bukele eventually won the 2019 elections by a historic margin, becoming the first president since 1992 not to belong to the two dominant parties, the socialist-oriented FMLN or the more bourgeois-conservative ARENA.

“They can kill anybody”

However, the difficulties were not over despite the electoral victory of the Salvadoran president, with his opponents sparing no means to stop him. They still controlled the Supreme Court and 90% of the legislature.

– I had to veto everything, and they override my vetoes. And they enact, they approved over 70 laws that I veto, Bukele explains in an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson.

The only solution Bukele saw was to also win a majority in the country’s Congress, which he would also succeed in doing. Today, only the electoral court, controlled by the liberal opposition, tried unsuccessfully to have the president impeached and jailed, which Bukele himself believes failed only because of the establishment’s fear of a large-scale popular revolt if he were to be removed from office.

Bukele tells Carlson that his first priority was to fulfill his election promise to tackle organized crime once and for all.

– You can’t do anything unless you have peace. And once you achieve peace, then you can struggle for the other things, like infrastructure, wealth, well being, quality of life. So we had to start with peace. And in the case of El Salvador, we were literally the murder capital of the world, says Bukele.

Bukele salutes the Salvadoran army.

One of the first things he did was to double the number of soldiers in the country’s army, equip them with modern equipment and then systematically deploy them to fight organized crime with a determination that had previously been lacking. The gangs, understandably, did not appreciate this and tried to fight back including a murder wave that killed 87 people in the small country in just three days.

– They can kill anybody. And if the state goes after them, the state has no intention of killing or harming anybody but the gang members. So you have 70,000 objectives, which were the 70,000 gang members, but they have 6 million possible targets (the population of the country). So it was almost an impossible task, said the president.

El Salvador’s new high-security prison CECOT, Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo or “terrorist prison” in English, houses the most serious gang members with a capacity for 40,000 prisoners. Life in the prison is extremely strict, with the only leisure time consisting of simple exercise and services by priests.

Even independent analysts point out that El Salvador is a very different country today than it was when Mr. Bukeles took office and that, according to the country’s official statistics, it has become the least crime-ridden of the American continents, including Canada and the United States.

– We’re safer than any other country in the western hemisphere. If I would have said that five years ago, they would say that I was crazy, right?

Mr. Bukele himself stresses that his government has not had access to any magic recipes, but that it has been able to solve the problem of gang crime because it had the political will and determination to actually do it.

– There’s always going to be crime, people breaking laws, but violent crime, people murdering and raping each other, is a voluntary decision that a government makes. Why would a government choose to have that? he asks.

Massive popular support

Politically, Bukeles’ El Salvador has also broken the mold on covid policy, with the government choosing to encourage healthy eating and exercise, rather than forcing the controversial covid vaccines on the population with covid passes. It was also one of the few countries to offer the drug hydroxychloroquine as an alternative treatment for COVID-19, something that Bukele pointed out was used by most world leaders themselves.

The focus of Bukele’s policies has been to push for economic reforms and, as part of this, he has made El Salvador the first country in the world to accept Bitcoin as legal tender meaning that it will be accepted as valid payment for all forms of debt and transactions. Enthusiasts of the new crypto-economy are now gathering in El Salvador, which many believe could become a new “tiger economy” in the Americas.

In the Western media, Bukele has been portrayed as something of a “dictator” who has rejected “human rights” in the context of mass arrests of suspected gang members and periods of prolonged military surveillance of specific areas of the country. Both domestic and international critics have accused the president of trying to centralize power, create a police state and undermine so-called democratic institutions and principles.

When he was re-elected in 2024 in a spectacular landslide with 84.6% of the vote, he responded to these criticisms in his much-publicized acceptance speech to the population by putting their rights before those of organized criminals.

– We are the safest country in the American continent. And what did they tell us? “You’re violating human rights”. Whose human rights? The rights of honest people? No. Perhaps we have prioritized the rights of the honest people over the criminals’ rights. That is all we have done, and that’s what you say is a human rights violation, Bukele declared.

Bukele with his wife Gabriela Roberta Rodríguez de Bukele. Photo: Casa Presidencial El Salvador

In an ironic response to similar epithets directed at him, he has referred to himself on Twitter/X as the “World’s coolest dictator”. The President has also become known for his extensive use of social media, particularly X, which he uses to communicate directly with the people, and sometimes to consult with the public on his decision-making.

This digital presence has made him very popular also among younger generations, who often see him as a modern leader of a very different type than the political establishment that ruled the country in the past.

The warning to the West

Bukele expresses personal criticism of the soft approach to criminals in the West, of which he considers El Salvador to be a part, pointing out that they are often seen as individuals with rights that need to be protected even if they are violent killers and organized gang members. This attitude, according to Bukele, ultimately leads to a point where civilization itself begins to crumble.

– So western civilization reached the peak. We can all agree that we’re in the decline. So that is happening because we’re not maintaining, we’re not giving the correct maintenance to the civilization, he says, explaining that we are no longer striving to do things as well and grandly as possible.

– Democracy works, but if you don’t maintain it, it will fall like the wall. So what we have right now is a huge erosion of Western civilization, Bukele concludes.

He points out that governments today seem mostly interested in appeasing individual constituencies to get their votes – for example, by giving them large sums of money or other generous promises, and that they no longer seem to care about what is good for the nation as a whole.

– You cannot go on. I mean, it’s like obvious. It’s like somebody eats too much, right? I mean, you can be a little fat, right? It’s fine. But then if somebody’s morbidly fat, somebody will come and say, okay, you mean you have to stop, right? Because, you know, your heart would. Your heart can’t take it anymore.

 

One focus for the outspoken president, now that the gangs have been defeated, is to attract investors and tourists to the country rather than being a haven for murderers and violent criminals. “There is enough money when no one steals is one of many similar quotes that sum up Bukele’s vision for the country’s future and have made him so popular with his own people.

Bukele often posts pictures showing how the country’s military and police fight organized crime. Photo: Nayib Bukele/FB

Many also argue that the success is an expression of the rise of a new generation of national populist leaders in a near-global revolt against the globalist “rainbow empire” characterized by gender ideology, demographic upheaval, coddling of violent criminals, and a huge gap between the political establishment and the population at large.

The Salvadoran president has also not been shy about explicitly criticizing influential globalists such as George Soros and others who he says have pushed for these kinds of developments in the West, and still have too much power over politics in many countries.

In his victory speech to the people in 2024, Bukele also articulated the importance for small nations to be alert to the actors of global politics, with El Salvador being just one example of many nations that have suffered in the wake of various factions of globalist-oriented actors and great powers.

– The civil war in El Salvador, which officially left over 85,000 Salvadorans dead, and displaced over 1 million people, was sponsored by two separate powers. There was a conflict between the West and the Soviet Union, and they wanted to fight, but not on their own soil. They didn’t want to provide the cannon fodder. So they decided to fight in other places around the world, and one of those places that they chose to fight was here in El Salvador. They tricked us. They told us to kill each other and we did as they said.

Bukele concluded by adding his view that there are now powerful players on the global stage who fear the example El Salvador has already shown.

We will continue to do the impossible, and El Salvador will continue to set an example for the world.

 

Nigeria to be next BRICS partner country

The new multipolar world order

Published 21 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Brazilian President Lula da Silva and Nigerian President Bola Tinubu are now members of the same club.

Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation with over 228 million inhabitants, has officially joined BRICS as a partner country, the Brazilian presidency announced. The organization now has ten members and nine official partner countries.

The Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced on Friday that Nigeria has now become the ninth official BRICS partner. The nation thus joins Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda and Uzbekistan.

In exercising its pro tempore presidency of BRICS, the Brazilian government announces today, January 17, 2025, the formal admission of Nigeria as a partner country of the grouping”, reads a formal statement.

BRICS now 10 member countries

In addition to the original five countries Brazil, Russia, India, South Africa and China Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia have recently become full members.

Among other things, the organization has stepped up efforts to develop an alternative payment system to reduce dependence on the US dollar. The initiative has faced opposition from US President Donald Trump, who has threatened to increase tariffs on member countries.

“Nigeria shares convergent interests with other members of BRICS. It plays an active role in strengthening South-South cooperation and in reforming global governance – issues that are top priorities during Brazil’s current presidency”, the official statement concludes.

Share via

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.

Send this to a friend