Richard Day: a mole or a prophet?

The globalist agenda

As early as 1969, doctor Richard Day predicted in very detailed terms a cashless big brother society with digital ID implants, combined with a hypersexualized and decadent culture. His background in the Rockefeller-linked project Planned Parenthood has led to speculation that Day's prophetic statements were possible simply through a real insight into the Western power oligarchy's ambitions for humanity.

Updated February 10, 2023, Published August 26, 2021 – By Editorial staff
Dr. Richard Day worked with the project Planned Parenthood, which was linked to Rockefeller.

Dr. Richard Lawrence Day (1905-1989) was born in New York and grew up in Summit, New Jersey. After high school, Day studied at Harvard University and later at Harvard Medical School. In 1933, he furthered his education at The Babies Hospital in New York City and also spent a lot of time at a clinic in New Jersey focusing primarily on pediatric and infantile diseases. Day's work at the reception later led to a full-time job at The Babies Hospital.

Day further researched infantile diseases and his projects included weight, sleep patterns, body temperature and metabolism. Among other things, he discovered that infants who slept in a cool space maintained normal body temperature throughout the sleep process. Days discoveries were unconventional for his time, with the authorities dismissing his work for 15 years, before in the mid-1950s it could be stated that Days' research on infants was essential to their well-being. His work on thermoregulation and body temperature resulted in him working during World War II to help soldiers cope with as cold conditions as possible.

After the war, Day returned to The Babies Hospital and developed new routines for caring for premature babies. From 1953 and 12 years onwards, the physician then chaired the pediatric wards at the Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York. During these years, he focused mainly on improving the education of medical students and trainees in evidence-based medicine.

In 1965, however, Day's work took a completely different direction when he started as medical director of Planned Parenthood International, whose main area is counselling and activities for contraception and abortion. His driving force behind this was a belief that overpopulation was the biggest problem facing the world. In 1968, Day returned to pediatrics at the new Mount Sinai School of Medicine and became one of the school's most popular teachers.

In 1988, Dr. Lawrence Dunegan published compiled notes from a meeting he attended nearly 20 years earlier, on March 20, 1969. The meeting was organized by Richard Day for, among others, medical students and health care experts who were expected to be prominent leaders. Before Day began to speak, he asked everyone in the room to turn off any recorders and put away note pads because what he had to say was so-called "off the record". Against this background, Dunegan sensed at the same time that what Day was going to perform was probably far too interesting not to be written down, so he snuck a pen and made notes, as far as he could, about the speech on tablecloths. After the meeting, he collected all the napkins and compiled a more well-written document about Day's explanations of the political goals that existed for humanity in the deeper establishment of power.

Below is a selection of the statements that Day, according to Dunagen, made in his 1969 speech:

State monitoring using technology

The TVs of the future, Day said, would work so that those who have access to the technology can look back at the viewer, like a surveillance camera. Another feature that would be used was to monitor what people were watching. When people became aware of the covert surveillance, the dependence on technology would already be so great that in practice it would not be possible to get rid of it. Day further said that these appliances would be used for the purchase of various products and that the people of the future would therefore not have to leave their homes very often.

Diseases, music and film, sexuality

Day stated in his speech that new diseases would emerge that were particularly difficult to diagnose and take time to find treatments for. He also said that in the future there will be cures available for almost all cancers at institutions such as the Rockefeller Institute, but that these would not be used for healing purposes for the general public which would instead be offered only pain relief treatment.

The music will get "worse and worse", Day said, predicting that lyrics would become increasingly sexual. The film industry was also to be sexualized, where cinemas would show almost pornographic content. He also said that pornography would later be acquired in the home in the form of cassettes or similar new technologies, with a constant escalation in the seriousness of pornography. Day said that not only would it be acceptable to show a lot of skin, but also that the fit of the clothes would be made in a seductive and promiscuous way. Homosexuality would be encouraged and become part of the culture, continued Day, who believed that the boundaries around how and with who people have sex would eventually be blurred.

Contraceptives, family, education

As part of controlling the population, acceptance of contraceptives would increase. Contraceptives would be so strongly linked to sexual intercourse that people would no longer be intimate with each other without them. These products would be easily accessible to the common man and available in both grocery stores and pharmacies, Day said. Abortions would be legalized worldwide and become socially accepted, with public financial aid for those who could not afford to pay for the abortions themselves.

The size of families would be controlled and divorces would be easier to complete. Women would increasingly work outside the home and men's jobs would require frequent and further travel. The purpose of this, according to Day, is to make it harder for the nuclear family to stick together as one unit and it would eventually fall apart.

As a result, children would spend more and more time in school, but still learn less than they did before. Schooling would also be extended.

ID cards, digital money, control of food production

Day also said that in the future, ID cards and permits would be required to travel. ID documents would be developed towards some form of implant under the skin to eliminate counterfeits.

In the future, money will no longer be in physical form, Day predicted. All transactions would be done digitally with a system that is connected to a form of registration where the sum of what you buy is deducted from a balance. No one will have to carry cash. Day also claimed that all the world's money and transactions would ultimately be controlled by a single super bank. Outwardly, however, it would be perceived as many different banks, Day pointed out.

By controlling food production, it would be possible to either create abundance or shortage of food as a means of further controlling the population, he said.

Euthanasia, religions, terrorism

People's sense of being "consumed" when at an old age would increase. When people feel that they are no longer an asset to the system, they will go to accepted euthanasia clinics, Day predicted.

Religions would also be adjusted and rewritten to adapt people's attitudes towards the new system. Terrorism would be used in those parts of the world where there was a need to accelerate "development".

Day further argued that change would be so common and far-reaching in the society of the future that people would eventually expect nothing to last - a necessary attitude that people would need to adopt in order to go through the changes those in a higher position wanted to implement.

Lawrence Dunegan had his notes published in 1988, which were also recorded by Randy Engel, a journalist and founder of the US Coalition for Life. The recording is divided into three parts and in the last part Dunegan is interviewed by Engel where Dunegan tells in more detail about the sources Richard Day refers to in the speech from 1969. The compilation of the secret speech and the later interview with Dunegan by Engel, can be listened to at the Internet Archive here.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

EU wants to increase Sweden’s membership fee by 60 percent

The globalist agenda

Published November 19, 2025 – By Editorial staff

The European Commission's budget proposal threatens to make Sweden's EU membership fee 60 percent more expensive. Swedish EU Minister Jessica Rosencrantz (M) calls the proposal "unrealistic".

The Commission's seven-year budget plan for 2028–2034 amounts to nearly €2,000 billion. Sweden's current fee is approximately €4 billion per year.

During Tuesday's ministerial meeting in Brussels, Jessica Rosencrantz, representing Sweden's center-right Moderate Party, distanced herself from the plans.

For Sweden, this means at least a 60 percent increase in fees. That is not realistic and many other countries face similar challenges, she told Swedish public radio.

Sweden, together with Austria, gathered several net contributors for breakfast before the meeting – countries that pay more into the EU budget than they receive back in support. Rosencrantz notes there is shared concern about how large the increases could be.

But unity was not complete. French Minister Benjamin Haddad made clear that Paris wants a larger budget, not least to secure agricultural subsidies.

The EU needs more own resources, Haddad stated.

He was referring to a system where money goes directly to Brussels without passing through national parliaments – something Sweden rejects.

The budget issue will be discussed at the summit in December, but a final decision is not expected until 2027.

Orbán: Poland has become a vassal of Brussels

The globalist agenda

Published November 3, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Relations between Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk (left) and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán are becoming increasingly toxic.

Relations between Viktor Orbán in Hungary and Donald Tusk in Poland are deepening into an open conflict over both EU influence and the war in Ukraine. Orbán argues that the Tusk problem goes far beyond bilateral disagreements — it's about Poland being given the role of Brussels' vassal state.

The Hungarian Prime Minister claims that Poland under Tusk has taken a dramatic step toward losing national autonomy and has also become a "vassal of Brussels".

"He has become one of the loudest warmongers in Europe – yet his war policy is failing: Ukraine is running out of European money, and the Polish people are tired of the war. He cannot change course because he has turned Poland into a vassal of Brussels", Orbán writes in a post on X.

Beyond the war in Ukraine, questions about the EU's role are also central to the conflict. Orbán has previously accused Brussels of playing an active role in helping Donald Tusk's EU-friendly government come to power in Poland.

Donald Tusk has in turn criticized Orbán for viewing "Brussels, democracy and a transparent rule of law are a problem", an attack that has further escalated tensions between the countries.

Shift in Polish public opinion

According to an opinion poll from the IBRiS institute, currently only 33.5 percent of Poles support Ukraine's NATO membership. This represents a shift that leads Orbán to claim that Europe is waking up, and that Polish public support for Ukraine is declining.

Donald Tusk, however, has declared the war in Ukraine as "our war", referring to the fact that the future of Poland and Europe is at stake. Orbán responds that both Poland and the EU are playing a dangerous game with the lives of millions of Europeans.

Hungary's repeated blocking of military support to Ukraine and its application for EU and NATO membership has long been a thorn in the side of Poland and other EU member states.

Poland and Hungary previously belonged to the so-called Visegrád Group (V4) and often shared positions against Brussels. But as the war in Ukraine progressed and major strategic dividing lines emerged, the relationship has become strained.

While Tusk strives to gain increased influence for Poland within the EU and NATO, Orbán has made it clear that he wants to see a different kind of European order — where nation-states have greater freedom and Brussels' central power is questioned.

Harsh criticism of Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado

The globalist agenda

Published October 11, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Maria Corina Machado has previously participated in the globalist forum World Economic Forum.

American journalist Max Blumenthal sharply criticizes the Nobel Committee's decision to award the 2025 Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition politician Maria Corina Machado.

In a statement on social media, he accuses the laureate of being a US-funded regime change activist and argues that the prize is a green light for military action against Venezuela.

Max Blumenthal, a journalist at the US-based news website The Grayzone, has in a lengthy post on X questioned the Nobel Committee's decision to award the Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela's opposition.

Blumenthal describes Machado as a political actor working in US interests rather than for peace. "The Nobel Committee has decided to make the case for Trump's war on Venezuela, giving its 'Peace Prize' to Maria Corina Machado, a US govt-funded regime change activist who's helped lead failed military coups, violent street riots, and has likely promised her country's oil and mineral wealth to a consortium of MAGA aligned billionaires in exchange for financing her political arsonism," he writes.

Comparisons to Pinochet and Netanyahu

The journalist harshly attacks the laureate, calling her "a marionette for Marco Rubio, a creation of the CIA-sponsored Gusano Industrial Complex that has brought violent terror and siege to any Latin American country defying the Washington Consensus of privatization and austerity, and a would-be Pinochet in a skirt."

Blumenthal also claims that Machado has turned to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for support. "This icon of peace has even appealed to Benjamin Netanyahu to help her lead a military invasion of Venezuela," he writes.

Criticism for supporting sanctions

A central part of Blumenthal's criticism concerns Machado's alleged lobbying for economic sanctions against her own country. He argues that she "has spent years lobbying for US and EU starvation sanctions on her own country, resulting in waves of migration to the US, fueling the nativist resentment that gave rise to Trump."

Blumenthal also points to Machado's response when Donald Trump sent Venezuelan migrants to a detention camp in El Salvador earlier this year. "When Trump shipped Venezuelan migrants to a torture camp in El Salvador this year, Machado predictably sided with Trump, the main sponsor of her putschist career, over her countrymen," he writes.

Committee's role a "soft power instrument"

The journalist draws parallels to previous controversial awards and argues that the decision regarding Machado is consistent with the Committee's role as a power instrument for the Western world. "Giving the Nobel to Machado is a green light for regime change war on Venezuela, and then Cuba. But the decision is consistent with the Committee's role as a soft power instrument of the Western empire," he states.

He recalls the prize to Barack Obama at the beginning of his first presidential term: "Just recall its award to Obama at the beginning of his first term, granting him infinite legitimacy in advance of his destruction of Libya, escalation of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and facilitation of Gaza's decimation."

Blumenthal concludes with an interpretation of what he sees as the real purpose behind the award: "Given that nothing has happened in Machado's career without the support and guidance of Washington, the Committee's decision must be seen as the result of another Western op - a coup in Oslo to pave the way for one in Caracas."

Tony Blair could gain power over Gaza

The globalist agenda

Published October 1, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair at the World Economic Forum power conference in Davos, earlier this summer.

The notorious globalist and war hawk Tony Blair now wants to govern post-war Gaza for up to five years. According to WikiLeaks, the plan would give outside forces control over everything from laws to money flows.

Tony Blair, the architect behind Britain's participation in the Iraq War that cost hundreds of thousands of lives, now wants to lead an international transitional authority for Gaza after the war ends. According to people with insight into the Trump administration's peace plan, Blair could become chairman of a "Gaza International Transitional Authority".

The plan has been developed together with Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and is primarily financed by tech billionaire Larry Ellison. According to reports, Blair would lead a secretariat of 25 people that would administer Gaza for up to five years.

WikiLeaks comments on the development in sharp terms:

"A battle is brewing over who will run the wasteland. Into this vacuum steps Tony Blair, lined up to head a US-backed Gaza International Transitional Authority", the organization writes.

The organization describes the arrangement as something far more comprehensive than traditional post-war governance:

"This is not postwar governance in a conventional sense but a model of neo-trusteeship; external control over territory, law, and the flows of reconstruction, data, and capital".

WikiLeaks also points to the economic interests behind the plan and notes that Blair is backed by principal funder Larry Ellison and plans to lead the administration for up to five years.

Notorious war instigator

Tony Blair is one of modern times' most notorious British politicians. As Prime Minister from 1997-2007, he gave his full support to US invasions of both Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.

Blair was accused of misleading the British Parliament and population about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction – weapons that were never found and whose existence is now questioned. The Chilcot Inquiry in 2016 established that Blair had exaggerated the threat from Saddam Hussein and that the British government had acted on inadequate or falsified intelligence information.

His close relationship with George W. Bush and unconditional support for American foreign policy earned him the nickname "Bush's poodle" from critics. Over one million demonstrated in London against the Iraq War in February 2003, but Blair still pushed through British participation.

Long-standing Israel support

Blair has been an outspoken Israel supporter over the years. As peace envoy for the Quartet – the UN, US, EU and Russia – he was responsible from 2007-2015 for promoting the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.

During his time, however, illegal settlement construction in the West Bank continued and the Gaza blockade remained. Palestinian leaders and human rights organizations repeatedly accused him of favoring Israel and functioning as a partisan political actor instead of a neutral mediator.

During Israel's war in Gaza, which has so far killed over 65,000 Palestinians according to local health authorities, Blair has been working on his plan for international governance of the area. He met President Trump at the White House last month to present the proposal.

Resistance from the Arab world

European and Arab states have already expressed opposition to the idea of an international trusteeship for Gaza. They argue that such an arrangement would further marginalize Palestinians and lack legitimacy in the eyes of Gaza residents. Instead, they advocate that Gaza should be governed by a committee consisting of Palestinian technocrats with support from the Palestinian Authority, which currently administers parts of the West Bank.

Trump presented his Gaza plan to Arab leaders in New York this week. The proposal gives Palestinians limited administrative power, but real control would lie with an international board – potentially led by Tony Blair.

However, everything could collapse as early as Monday. That's when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets President Trump in Washington – and Netanyahu has already made his position clear: the Palestinian Authority will have no role in Gaza's future and Hamas must be completely eliminated.

Without Israeli approval, the plan cannot be implemented, which would stop both Trump's peace attempt and Blair's return to Middle East politics.