Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

No one escapes the chokehold of driving

The exaggerated climate crisis

Politicians make it purposefully and systematically increasingly difficult for ordinary people to have a car. Among other things, what can be expected in the future are more expensive cars, more expensive fuel, more expensive insurance and more expensive parking.

Published 19 January 2022
– By Tege Tornvall
Photo: Kathy/Unsplash
This is an opinion piece. The author is responsible for the views expressed in the article.

More expensive cars. Higher taxes. Only minor subsidies. More expensive fuel. More expensive electricity. More expensive insurance. More expensive parking. Fewer parking spaces. More traffic on streets and roads.

Motorists and car owners are expecting all of this in the future. Not even electric cars will escape it. And those who decide all of this are those in Sweden’s small Green Party, which at present in the Swedish Parliament is being given free rein for its generally anti-automobile views.

The Greens are not alone in disliking exhaust fumes, noise, and congestion. But apart from this, they also disapprove of anyone privately owning cars in the first place. They want us all to travel by public transport, by train or bus – or even better, to walk or cycle.

This may be suitable for fast and alert city-dwellers of an active age. The Greens’ ideal world seems to be one where there are thousands of sporty, brisk persons on the go, with porridge and carrot juice in the bag. But many more are not living this way, nor do they want to – nor could they.

This applies not least to everyone who contributes to the value and development of Swedish society through his or her labor. These are the people whose work contributes to child care, education, research, healthcare, elder care, policing, defense, and other community services. For them, time is a scarce commodity and distance an obstacle. They solve these problems using their own cars. They even do the labor of driving themselves, even though this usually goes unpaid (although it is taxed). Our politicians know this and start from in times of unrest.

But otherwise, private driving is a huge tax cow: it never runs out, since the need for private transportation is so great that it can rarely be met by public transportation alone.

Instead of thanking ordinary citizens for their service and facilitating the ownership and use of their own cars, the Swedish Parliament – and the government are responding with more restrictions and stricter fees.

This is what Swedish drivers’ everyday lives looked like in the autumn of 2021

 

Car prices

Only smaller gas and diesel cars cost less than SEK 300-350,000. Hybrids cost SEK 50-100,000 more than that. Pure electric cars of a practical size cost around half a million or more – but thus far their owners receive 70,000 kronor in bonuses.

Leasing

Smaller gas and diesel cars cost SEK 2-3,000 per month under a three-year contract. A few electric cars were being leased for around SEK 3,000 per month in order to entice more sales, but most of them cost at least 4-5,000 kroner per month. Companies can deduct Value-Added Tax from the price.

Tax

Everyone was paying SEK 360 per year. Gas and diesel cars result in a carbon dioxide tax of SEK 107 per gram and kilometer between 90 and 130 g/km. It is SEK 132 per gram over 130 g/km. Taxes increased in 2022: a VW Passat was SEK 1,700 more expensive, which equals SEK 9,000 per year. Electric cars receive their SEK 70,000 bonus, although there is no bonus for those that cost more than SEK 700,000. In 2023, the bonus will be reduced to SEK 50,000.

Fuel

Gas cost about 17.50 per liter in October, while diesel cost SEK 19. Price hikes were in progress, however. Drivers have a duty to reduce emissions, which means blending ethanol with the fuel. This will gradually increase until it reaches 28% by 2030 for gas, and 66% for diesel. This is worse for engines. Likewise, the lower energy content leads to higher consumption – meaning that it will also be more expensive.

Charging electric cars

Charging directly from the grid at 1.50 per kWh means that it costs approximately SEK 3 per mile. Using a charging box at home or at work, including installation, costs SEK 10-20,000. Over five years, that means 2-4,000 kronor per year, or about 1.50-3 kronor per mile. At the charging post, it is SEK 2-5 per kWh and SEK 4-10 per mile. Ionity tar 8.70 per kWh = 17.40 per mil. Additionally, parking fees may apply. It may be cheapest to charge at home, but this also means a limited range.

Parking

The countryside and smaller towns still often use a parking disc for free parking. The larger cities charge a parking fee that ranges from a few kronor all the way to 50 kronor per hour in Stockholm’s inner city. The purpose of this, as some MPs have openly stated, is quite simply to get cars out of the cities.

Garages

The rent per square meter is around SEK 500-1,000 per year = SEK 12 – 24,000 per year, and is higher in large cities. The cost also increases with demand.

Insurance

It is getting more expensive for more expensive cars, as well as due to the sensitive electronics that are increasingly being added to cars. The current crucial issue in relation to electronic driver assistance is the question of who is driving the car in the event of an accident.

Financing

Low interest rates provide cheap loans and make private leasing more interesting, but increasing pressure on higher interest rates could result in interest rates of 4-6% and higher borrowing costs within a few years.

Benefit cars

New rules are increasing the costs and reducing the deductions. There will be no difference between buying and owning a car privately – other than that you, as a private person, do not have to finance the deal. In return, you commit to a fixed monthly price during the contract period. The benefit reduces pensionable income.

Conclusion

Having a car is becoming more and more expensive, as well as more difficult due to taxes and regulations. In larger cities, extra costs can almost double the total cost. You can take a lot of taxis for the same price, but the car gives you more freedom – even in your working life.

 

Tege Tornvall

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Ad:

Climeworks’ green billion-dollar venture in Iceland dismissed as a scam

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published yesterday 14:19
– By Editorial Staff
Climework's activities are described as at best pointless - at worst, downright harmful.

Despite promises of groundbreaking climate solutions, Swiss carbon dioxide giant Climeworks’ facility in Iceland has not only captured far less than promised – it has also emitted more carbon dioxide than it has absorbed.

Critics say the whole operation is deeply deceptive and one of many examples of scam projects created to profit from the alleged climate crisis.

Climeworks, a Swiss company that markets itself as a pioneer in direct carbon capture (DAC), has failed to achieve its targets in Iceland despite significant investment and media attention.

According to data from the verification company Puro.Earth and the company’s own annual reports, Climeworks has only captured around 2,400 tons of CO₂ in Iceland since 2021 – far below the promised capacity ceiling of 12,000 tons. In addition, the company’s own emissions from its operations have exceeded its capture: in 2023 alone, Climeworks emitted 1,700 tons of CO₂, significantly more than its total capture.

Climeworks’ first facility, Orca, was unveiled in 2021 with a capacity of 4,000 tons of CO₂ per year. In reality, it has never even reached half that target. The larger Mammoth facility, which could capture 36,000 tons annually, has only managed to collect 105 tons after ten months of operation.

According to CEO Jan Wurzbacher, Mammoth requires 5,000–6,000 kWh per ton of CO₂ captured – a process described as extremely inefficient. To offset Iceland’s total emissions (12.4 million tons in 2024), 72 terawatt hours of energy would be needed – four times the country’s annual electricity production.

Professor: “A scam”

Climeworks’ Icelandic subsidiary has negative equity of ISK 3.6 billion (€25 million) and is entirely dependent on funding from its parent company. The value of the Orca machine has also been written down by €1.25 million due to underperformance.

Despite this, the company has sold future carbon credits equivalent to one-third of Mammoth’s planned capacity for the next 25 years – even though over 21,000 private subscribers who have paid in advance risk having to wait decades for their certificates.

Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of environmental science at Stanford University, calls the entire DAC industry a big scam and fraud.

– Direct capture is a scam, carbon capture is a scam, blue hydrogen is a scam, and electrofuel is a scam. These are all scam technologies that do nothing for the climate or air pollution.

“Semi-magical technology”

Michael de Podesta, a British pensioner who paid ISK 135,000 (€940) for 2.2 tons of CO₂ capture, expresses similar concerns in his blog, and after looking into the company more closely, he believes he has probably been scammed.

This has all the hallmarks of a scam. There are undoubtedly a lot of highly paid people traveling the world to sell their services to large corporations to remove carbon credits in the future. They are using a semi-magical technology that doesn’t work as well as expected (better known as Orca) but will work perfectly in a larger version (Mammoth)”.

“I am urged to convince my friends to join the project. The answers are scarce and full of PR chatter. Climeworks’ operations look like a scam and talk like one. But is it a scam? I don’t know. I think it could work, but the company’s answers are so opaque that it’s hard to say”, he continues.

He will not know for sure until 2027 whether Climeworks has actually captured the 2.2 tons of carbon dioxide he has paid for.

Millions from the US

It is also worth noting that the company has received or been promised around $800 million in public subsidies, including $625 million from the US Department of Energy and $5 million from Switzerland. Despite this, the cost per ton of CO₂ captured remains at $1,000 – ten times higher than the original target.

Due to the failures of DAC, Climeworks has now instead begun to focus on “enhanced weathering”, a highly controversial method in which crushed rock is bound with CO₂. However, researchers believe that this is a sign of desperation to fulfill credits that have already been sold.

In summary, critics point out that Climeworks’ operations have been characterized by exaggerated promises, technical shortcomings, and financial irresponsibility since its inception. Despite being ranked as one of the world’s leading green tech companies by Time Magazine, its contribution to climate action is described as marginal at best and at worst as directly counterproductive and harmful.

Swedish homeowners could face thousands in fees for municipal “climate action”

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 13 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
According to Romina Pourmokhtari, Minister for Climate and Environment, municipalities will not be able to charge land and property owners "any amount".

A new report suggests that Swedish property owners may be required to finance municipalities’ “climate adaptation measures”, with costs potentially reaching tens of thousands of EUR.

The proposal, which has been submitted to Climate and Environment Minister Romina Pourmokhtari (L), gives municipalities the right to, for example, build flood defenses to protect “matters of public interest” – and then charge property owners who are considered to benefit from the measure.

The investigator Johan Hjalmarsson himself points out that the term “public interest” is deliberately broad and vaguely worded.

– It could be buildings such as municipal buildings and schools, but it doesn’t have to be. There will need to be a municipal connection, but it doesn’t have to be a municipal facility, he told state television.

However, for the fee to apply, there must be a “significant risk” of damage from a specific natural event, and this risk must be eliminated by the measure. A property owner’s total fee may not exceed 10 percent of the market value of the property.

“Cannot charge whatever fees they want”

Liberal Climate and Environment Minister Romina Pourmokhtari claims that the proposal is about dealing with the direct consequences of the alleged climate crisis:

– In the same way that we have great respect and a strong desire to defend property rights in Sweden, with property rights come not only freedoms but also obligations. This is an example of the real consequences of climate change. Not in the future, but today, and that must be taken into account, she asserts.

She further promises that municipalities “cannot charge whatever fees they want”.

– Whether the government will implement this or not is something we cannot say today, she continues, describing the proposals as “interesting”.

Not all coastlines can be protected

The report also proposes that the state take responsibility for protecting certain coastlines from flooding through physical barriers, and Hjalmarsson admits that this will require prioritizing and choosing what to protect and which communities to leave exposed to the elements.

– But this is not something that will change overnight; the costs can be spread out over many years.

He argues that the need is urgent and that he has “met many municipalities that see the need for a decision from the state now”.

Maximum temperatures in nursing homes

The report also highlights the need to introduce maximum temperatures in premises for particularly vulnerable groups, such as the elderly.

– Heat waves are already a major problem for the elderly in our society. So I think it’s very important that these issues are brought to light and that we discuss what we can do, says Pourmokhtari.

For municipalities, this could mean a requirement to install air conditioning in nursing homes.

– If requirements are the way forward, this is something the government will need to look at. But action will be needed, and too little is being done today, adds the minister.

The investigator’s report will now be prepared by the Government Offices and sent out for consultation in accordance with standard procedures.

Swedish Green Party: Fuel prices to rise sharply if we win 2026 election

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 11 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Amanda Lind, Green Party, promises higher fuel prices in case of an election win next year.

The Swedish Green Party wants to see higher prices for petrol and diesel if it wins next year’s election and is counting on support from other red-green parties. The party is proposing a significantly higher reduction target and a new emissions trading system.

According to spokesperson Amanda Lind, Sweden risks missing several climate targets with its current policy and believes that a faster transition requires fossil fuels to become more expensive.

Amanda Lind emphasized in the tax-funded SVT program “30 minuter” that the party wants to raise the reduction obligation so that the price of gasoline and diesel initially rises by two to three kronor per liter, and then gradually more until 2030.

It will be more expensive for us to manage the climate transition, Lind said.

Broad consensus

The Green Party wants to phase out the reduction obligation in the long term and instead introduce a national emissions trading system, where companies must purchase emission allowances from the state. Until this system is in place, the party wants the reduction obligation to be increased, which will directly affect the price at the pump.

Amanda Lind believes that the entire opposition supports this approach and that there is broad agreement that traditional fuels must cost more.

The Kristersson government has previously lowered the reduction obligation and thus fuel prices, which the Green Party believes has slowed down electrification and climate work. To mitigate the impact on households with long distances to travel, the party wants to introduce targeted support and at the same time invest in public transport and electric cars.

Overall, the Green Party’s proposal means that fuel prices will increase gradually over the coming years if the red-green coalition wins the 2026 election.

Sweden Democrats leader dismisses climate alarmism: “No reason to panic”

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 7 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Jimmie Åkesson wants the focus to be on long-term and sustainable initiatives - not quick panic solutions.

Unlike most other Swedish establishment politicians, Sweden Democrats leader Jimmie Åkesson is highly skeptical of the climate alarmist rhetoric that dominates and wants the EU to slow down its climate initiatives.

Åkesson does not believe that the “climate threat” is in reality as serious as it is often portrayed by politicians and the media, nor does he buy the argument that we must hurry up and do everything we can before it is too late.

– I don’t share the view that there is such a hurry, he tells the tabloid Aftonbladet. Instead, he wants to put more resources into military rearmament.

– I am absolutely no expert, but everyone I talk to who has really familiarized themselves with what the IPCC’s various reports and scenarios say, there is no reason whatsoever to panic or climate anxiety, or anything like that at all.

Instead of quick and ill-considered measures that can have very negative consequences for society at large, the leader of the Sweden Democrats argues that we should invest in a long-term transition and electrification.

As expected, Åkesson’s departure from the established narrative on the climate issue has not gone down well with everyone.

Climate professor: “Very urgent”

Markku Rummukainen is a professor of climatology at Lund University and until 2023 represented Sweden on the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) a body tasked with compiling and presenting research on alleged climate change, global warming and its consequences.

The climate professor raged against Åkesson’s move, firmly stating that his views contradict the IPCC reports and unlike the SD leader, Rummukainen emphasized that it is “very urgent” to stop climate change.

– Yes, it is. There are, of course, different options for the way forward depending on what we do. There are opportunities to limit climate change between 1.5 and 2 degrees. If we don’t take the climate issue seriously, we will end up with higher numbers.

– According to the IPCC, all emissions matter. We are already seeing, and being affected by, the impacts of climate change. These include rising temperatures, rising sea levels and more extreme events such as more intense heatwaves and heavier rainfall. The effects are increasing rapidly with emissions, he continues.

“Following Putin’s lead”

Green Party spokesperson Daniel Helldén is also outraged by Jimmie Åkesson’s comments and says he has “got the whole climate issue backwards“.

Helldén also makes repeated attempts to link the SD leader with Russia and Vladimir Putin because Russian gas and oil exports are said to benefit if the EU does not invest heavily in “green” energy.

– It would strengthen the states that we are now trying to arm ourselves against. The policy he is pursuing is really following Putin’s lead. He must be cheering what he is saying.

– Russia’s huge exports of gas and oil are higher than the aid Europe gives to Ukraine. If the EU were to put the brakes on climate action, Russia could continue exporting. It will be Putin who wins from it, he repeats.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.