Saturday, April 19, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Study: 1500 cows to be kept inside for 18 months

Published 29 April 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Current grazing rules for cows are said to have a negative impact on self-sufficiency.

1500 cows will be kept indoors for 18 months to study how they are affected. One of the reasons for this is that the Swedish Farmers’ Union (LRF) has been working for some time to remove the grazing rights that exist in Sweden for cows, and together with Växa Sverige has succeeded in obtaining approval for the study from the Uppsala Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee.

Already in 2021, the association Växa Sverige together with LRF applied to start a study to investigate how it affected 2500 cows to be kept inside for a longer period, even during the grazing period. The application was made to the Gothenburg Animal Experimentation Ethics Board, which immediately stopped the project. The motivation for this was that it was noted that it was already known that cows benefit from being outdoors, through previous research, and that it was therefore not justified to expose the animals to suffering in order to investigate something that was already known, and which could not contribute to improvements for animals in the future.

In January this year, a new application was submitted, but this time to the Uppsala Animal Experimentation Ethics Board, where the number of cows was reduced to 1500. The study would involve the cows being indoors 24 hours a day for 18 months. The purpose has been stated to be to “investigate whether, and if so how, the welfare of dairy cows changes month by month during an 18-month period of housing”, writes Djurskyddet, which has taken note of the application.

The reasoning is that the study should be carried out because Sweden should increase its self-sufficiency in dairy products, but that current grazing rules have a negative impact in some cases. While the Board said that “the benefits of the study could outweigh the suffering of the animals”, it also considered that “the applicant does not convincingly demonstrate this” and therefore rejected the application.

In April, a third application was made, this time to the Uppsala Animal Experimentation Ethics Board, where, at the Board’s request, the application was amended and made more specific.

The application has now been approved, which means that 1500 cows on Swedish farms will be kept indoors in loose housing for 18 months, including during the summer months. Seven herds have currently been recruited, says Växa Sverige in a press release. These are located in Västra Götaland, Jönköping, Kalmar, Gävleborg and Uppsala counties. They will then see how the cows are affected by this and predict that this will have a major impact on Sweden’s future milk production.

– As the person in charge of the study, I am pleased that the Board has thoroughly examined our application and reached the same conclusions as we did about the current lack of knowledge, says Fredrik von Unge, Vana’s trial manager.

For some time now, Sweden has had a law that allows cows to come out during the summer and have so-called “grazing rights”. As early as 2020, LRF started a campaign against removing the cows’ ability to graze and argued that they should instead be kept indoors, as reported by Natursidan. The association has been heavily criticized for this, with organic farmers saying it was “shameful”. Even the Christian Democrats and the Moderates have, for example, in a survey from Djurskyddet in 2022, responded that they are in favor of abolishing the grazing right.

– We hope that the study provides a clear and scientific basis for good animal husbandry throughout the year. For one thing we have known for a long time: healthy and well-behaved animals produce more and better, says Peter Kofoed, head of LRF Mjölk.

The results of the study are expected to be available in 2024.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Lynx thrive in Finland

Published 12 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff

In the last twenty years, the number of lynx has more than doubled in Finnish forests, it is estimated according to the latest census.

In the 1960s, the lynx became a protected species in the country, but today it has increased to the point where it is considered viable. In the last twenty years, the number of lynx in Finland has more than doubled and this year the count was 2300 individuals.

Lynx are found throughout Finland, except for the reindeer herding area in the north and some parts of Ostrobothnia. According to Annika Herrero, a researcher at the Natural Resources Institute Finland, lynx are most abundant in Uusimaa, Southwest Finland, Häme and South Savo.

A major reason for the increase is abundant food. Lynx like to eat hares and small cervids, such as white-tailed deer and roe deer, which have been abundant in Finland. Reproduction is also progressing.

Lynx are reproducing efficiently, Herrero told the Finnish state broadcaster Yle.

The lynx was close to extinction about 100 years ago, but even in Sweden today there are about 1300 lynx. The population has been relatively stable in recent years, increasing in some counties and decreasing in others.

In both Sweden and Finland, a form of licensed hunting of lynx is carried out, with the aim of regulating the populations in the countries. In Sweden, the hunt is mainly motivated by a desire to reduce the risk of serious damage to domestic animals, while the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) emphasizes that lynx also have an important function in the ecosystem and calls for other preventive measures rather than hunting. During this year’s Swedish license hunt, a total of 87 lynx were shot, the previous year the figure was significantly higher when every tenth lynx was shot in the country.

The Baltic Sea is getting better – and worse

Published 11 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff

Oxygen levels in some parts of the Baltic Sea have improved, particularly in the Gulf of Finland. However, in other areas, such as the Baltic Sea’s main basin and the Bothnian Sea, oxygen conditions remain poor.

The annual research cruise of the marine research vessel Aranda passed through the Gulf of Finland, the northern Baltic Sea and the Gulf of Bothnia. The voyage is carried out within the framework of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the monitoring program developed by the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission. Data collected during the expedition included oxygen, salinity and temperature stratification of the sea, and nutrient levels.

The results show that oxygen levels in the Gulf of Finland, from bottom to surface, are the best in five years. Conditions were good from the eastern part of the Gulf all the way to the Hanko headland. Oxygen-free water with hydrogen sulphide was only detected on the north-western coast of Estonia.

Oxygen levels were also high in the Archipelago Sea. Storm Jari and unusually high temperatures helped to mix the water from the surface to the bottom.

Worse in some places

Scientists generally believe that the improvement was not due to human intervention, but to the weather. The winters of 2020 and 2025 had similar weather patterns, with prolonged westerly winds pushing new water into the Gulf of Finland.

The latest data is not entirely positive either, with a deterioration in oxygen levels in the deep areas of the Bothnian Sea.

At the same time, the situation in the main basin of the Baltic Sea remains unchanged. Oxygen-free water is found from 80-90 meters depth, and the oxygen-poor area extends all the way from the Bornholm Deep to the northern parts of the main basin.

– The oxygen-free area in the main basin now measures nearly 50,000 square kilometers,, said researcher Pekka Kotilainen in a press release.

 

Light pollution affects coral reefs

Published 5 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
When artificial light illuminates coral reefs at night, it makes it harder for fish to hide from nocturnal predators

Artificial light is making coral reefs more dangerous for prey fish, according to a new study. Among other things, it can wake sleeping fish and attract predators, drastically altering the nightlife of coral reefs.

Light pollution, i.e. man-made light, has doubled approximately every eight years, according to a study from 2023. Artificial light has a significant impact on the environment and has been increasingly identified as a contributing factor to, among other things, the deterioration of pollination, mass death of insects and negative effects on birds.

It has also been shown to affect marine life, especially fish. Artificial light affects 22% of the world’s coastlines, equivalent to 1.6 million square kilometers.

More dangerous coral reefs

Light pollution also affects about 15% of the world’s coral reefs, creating a very different environment compared to that provided by natural darkness. A new study from the University of Bristol, together with researchers from French Polynesia and Chile, shows that coral reefs are becoming particularly difficult for prey fish to live in.

–When the sun sets, coral reefs undergo a dramatic transformation. The vibrant fish we see in the day retreat to sleep among the corals and elusive nocturnal species emerge from caves and cervices in pursuit of prey, said lead author Dr. Emma Weschke in a press release.

The researchers used custom-built underwater infrared night vision cameras to film the reef at night without disturbing the behavior of the fish, since fish cannot see infrared light.

When artificial light illuminates coral reefs at night, it makes it harder for fish to hide from nocturnal predators. The light also attracts predators, and fish that normally sleep stay awake.

– Many of the species detected on artificially lit reefs were not nocturnal fish, but those that are only usually active during the day. Finding that light pollution can cause fish to stay awake later than usual is concerning because sleep – like for us – is likely essential for regenerating energy and maintaining fitness, says Dr. Weschke.

There is hope

It took an average of 25 days of exposure to artificial light for these changes to occur. Only a few days were not enough, which the researchers welcome because, conversely, reducing light pollution can have a relatively immediate effect.

Unlike greenhouse gasses and plastics, artificial light is a pollutant that doesn’t leave a residue when switched off. Limiting artificial light in both its intensity and duration, prioritizing it for essential needs and reducing aesthetic use, will help reestablish naturally dark nights that marine ecosystems evolved with, says Emma Weschke.

Florida governor supports ban on weather manipulation

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 4 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Ronald Dion "Ron" DeSantis, Florida's governor since 2019, is a strong critic of spraying aluminum, sulfates and other compounds into the air. The image on the right is illustrative.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis expresses strong support for a bill to ban geoengineering and weather manipulation in the state, but criticizes the House of Representatives for watering it down.

The statement comes amid an ongoing debate on the health risks associated with these practices, in which the state’s health secretary Joseph Ladapo has also raised his voice.

Ron DeSantis has commented in an appearance on X on a bill by Senator Ileana Garcia that seeks to ban geoengineering, also called aerosol spraying, and weather manipulation in Florida.

The bill has passed the Senate Rules Committee by a vote of 20-4, but faced opposition in the House of Representatives, where amendments have been made that would allow these practices instead.

DeSantis is clear in his support for Senator Garcia’s initiative.

– Senator Ileana Garcia has a bill in the Florida Senate to ban geoengineering and weather manipulation in the state of Florida. I support the bill, he says.

He strongly criticizes the House of Representatives for their handling of the bill.

– The Florida House of Representatives has gutted Senator Garcia’s legislation, DeSantis adds, warning that a watered-down law could set the practice of geoengineering and weather manipulation.

Criticism of “kooky ideas” on climate solutions

The governor rejects ideas about manipulating the atmosphere to counter climate change.

– People got a lot of kooky ideas that they can get in and put things in the atmosphere to block the sun and save us from climate change. We’re not playing that game in Florida, he says.

DeSantis is now urging the public to put pressure on the House of Representatives.

I hope people will tell the House of Representatives in Florida: do not gut this bill, he concludes.

Surgeon general warns of risks

Florida’s surgeon general, Joseph Ladapo, has also spoken out on the issue and supports Senator Garcia’s work. In a post on X the same day, he writes: “These planes release aluminum, sulfates, and other compounds with unknown and harmful effects on human health”.

Ladapo emphasizes the importance of protecting Florida’s environment and residents. “We have to keep fighting to clean up the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat”, he adds.

Background geoengineering: Environmental and health concerns

The debate over geoengineering, also called aerosol spraying, has intensified in Florida following reports of potential health risks. According to data from US health advocate Mike Adams, samples from Florida's skies have indicated high levels of toxic metals such as aluminum, which is being linked to weather manipulation.

Four senators – Shevrin Jones, Lori Berman, Tracie Davis and Rosalind Osgood – voted against the bill in the Senate Rules Committee, which has drawn criticism from groups like Florida Sky Watchers, which accuses them of prioritizing partisan politics over environmental protection.

The House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a supermajority with 87 out of 120 seats, has, according to critics such as Christina Pushaw, chosen to support practices such as carbon storage instead of banning weather manipulation, which was seen as a controversial move.

In Sweden, the aerosol spraying debate has been completely dismissed by mainstream media as "conspiracy theories" despite the fact that spraying has also occurred in Sweden via the Esrange space base in Kiruna.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.