Tuesday, September 9, 2025
The Nordic Times

Polaris of Enlightenment

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Breaking News

https://nordictimes.com/world/british-man-called-someone-a-muppet-was-arrested-by-four-police-officers/

World

British man called someone a “muppet” – was arrested by four police officers

The threat to freedom of speech

Published today 11:58
– By Editorial Staff
"This seems insane even for Britain", reads one of many critical assessments.
3 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

A video clip now spreading on social media shows British police arresting a man for calling someone a “muppet” – British slang for idiot.

The kafkaesque arrest is seen as yet another example of how police engage in Orwellian thought control instead of fighting real crime – a development that has led increasing numbers to speak of a police state.

Many details surrounding the arrest remain unclear, but when the man in the video asks what he has done, police confirm that “there has been a member of the public who you have apparently been showing calling a muppet”.

The man was arrested under British public order laws that prohibit “offensive” or “insulting” behavior in public – for using a word that in the UK is common slang for describing a foolish person.

The incident comes shortly after British comedian Graham Linehan was arrested at London’s Heathrow Airport by five armed police officers. His “crime” was posting “gender-critical” comments on X.

Linehan was subsequently hospitalized with high blood pressure and has vowed to sue the police for what he describes as an “illegal” arrest.

Author J.K. Rowling was among the few public figures who spoke out for Linehan. She asked what the UK has transformed into and called the arrest “totalitarian”.

“Reject this lunacy”

In response to criticism, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has claimed that the UK has freedom of speech – but many argue that the latest video with the “muppet arrest” disproves this assertion.

US Vice President J.D. Vance has also previously criticized European leaders in sharp terms for suppressing citizens’ freedom of speech.

— Insulting someone is not a crime, and criminalizing speech is going to put real strain on European-US relationships. This is Orwellian, and everyone in Europe and the US must reject this lunacy, he stated after German police conducted over 170 house searches targeting people suspected of insulting the country’s leaders or expressing politically incorrect opinions.

“Beyond insane”

The video has sparked widespread criticism on X and other social media platforms.

“The Police need shutting down and starting again. Let’s be honest. They’re corrupted by woke nonsense and have been for decades”, writes user Basil the Great.

Jill M points to the strange priorities: “I love how they send 4, 5, 6 ‘officers’ to arrest 1 person for saying a hurty word. Disgusting. Look how smug they are like they’re saving the public from those dreaded hurty words. Meanwhile, girls & women are attacked by those who shall not be named by hurty words”.

“This seems insane even for Britain”, writes a third person.

User MO wonders: “That’s beyond insane. The UK has gone from policing crime to policing thoughts & feelings. What’s next—prison for sarcasm?”

To which he gets a response: “Prison for sarcasm is not next it has already been several times. Along with silent prayers. unless you are an Islamist’s or a deranged leftist, in that case, you really really have to giantly effe up to face some mild consequences”.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

https://nordictimes.com/analysis/when-did-dissenting-views-become-a-threat-to-the-nation/

Analysis

When did dissenting views become a threat to the nation?

The threat to freedom of speech

Jenny Piper

When a British nationalist is detained for over 24 hours and deported – without criminal charges – it says more about Sweden than about him. We like to talk about freedom of speech - but those who don't share the establishment's values are not welcome in Sweden.

Published 5 August 2025
– By Jenny Piper
To visit Ulf Kristersson's Sweden, it's not enough to have the right papers and documents - you must also have the "right" opinions.
2 minute read

I read in the media that British nationalist Mark Collett, labeled as a neo-Nazi by mass media and the Swedish anti-extremist organization Expo, was reportedly stopped at Stockholm’s Arlanda Airport on Friday and denied entry to the country, despite there being no criminal suspicion.

Collett, who leads the British nationalist organization “Patriotic Alternative”, is described in media as a leading figure within far-right circles in Britain and was invited as a speaker to “Det fria Sveriges” (Free Sweden’s) summer festival in Töreboda, a town in central Sweden. However, Swedish police denied Collett entry to Sweden, and on his Telegram channel, Collett writes that he was told he posed a threat to public order, society’s structure, and the values on which Sweden and Europe are built.

According to his own account, he was detained at the airport for over 25 hours without access to either his luggage or passport, and without criminal suspicion or trial.

I had no idea who this person was, but after this macabre action by Swedish border police, I watched a British documentary about him and can only conclude that Sweden, as usual, overreacts and uses double standards when making decisions.

Collett and his party are nationalists who want their own people to be prioritized in society over immigrants, a development that has grown and escalated in pace with irresponsible migration policy, which in the long run affects their own citizens, who must pay the bill and step aside. Much like the development in Sweden, as well as other parts of Europe, where conservative/right-nationalist parties are growing as a consequence of mass migration to the EU and the accompanying increased crime and worsened conditions for their own people.

One doesn’t have to agree with this, but Mark Collett has the right to hold this opinion and run a political party with these values. This is not grounds for denying him entry to Sweden. And it also rhymes very poorly with the fact that we don’t stop either “returning” ISIS terrorists at the border or, for that matter, so-called Islamist hate preachers who regularly travel in and out of the country, to give some examples.

Moreover, we in Sweden are very good at beating our chests when it comes to freedom of speech and pointing fingers at other countries that engage in opinion suppression/opinion persecution, but apparently we are no better ourselves.

This is so absurd that words fail me. That a person who has committed no wrong should be denied entry to the country based on his values not being sufficiently politically correct.

Shameful, Sweden!

 

Jenny Piper

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

https://nordictimes.com/the-nordics/sweden/british-nationalist-leader-stopped-at-arlanda-alleged-to-threaten-swedish-values/

Sweden

British nationalist leader stopped at Arlanda – alleged to threaten Swedish values

The threat to freedom of speech

Published 5 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Collett was scheduled to speak at a summer party organized by the nationalist association Det Fria Sverige (Free Sweden) in Töreboda, a town in central Sweden.
2 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

British nationalist Mark Collett, leader of the organization Patriotic Alternative, was detained by Swedish border police immediately upon arrival at Arlanda Airport near Stockholm on Friday – and subsequently deported.

He was an invited speaker at a summer festival organized by the nationalist association Det fria Sverige (Free Sweden) in Töreboda, central Sweden, but was stopped with the justification that he “poses a threat to public order, society’s structure and the values on which Sweden and Europe are built”.

According to Collett’s own account, he was held at the airport for over 25 hours, without access to luggage or passport, despite not being suspected of any crime.

“After being stranded for more than 25 hours at the airport, two police officers finally came and said it was time to leave. They escorted me to a gate and made sure I boarded a direct flight home”, he writes on Telegram.

He further notes that no EU country would dream of treating an illegal immigrant the way Swedish border police treated him – despite him entering the country completely legally.

The deportation is based on utlänningslagen (Chapter 8, sections 11-12), which gives authorities the right to deny entry to foreigners deemed to pose “a genuine, actual and sufficiently serious threat to a fundamental societal interest”. What this means in practice is very unclear and leaves extensive and arbitrary room for interpretation. Critics argue that the law is used to prevent regime critics and dissidents from entering the country, based on their opinions rather than actual criminality.

Ideologically driven border control

Collett has been a well-known figure in British nationalism for decades, with a clearly immigration-critical and ethno-nationalist agenda. However, it remains unclear how his views that non-European mass immigration is destructive and negative would constitute a threat to Swedish interests. According to critics, the case rather demonstrates ideologically driven border control, where political positions – not actions – determine who is allowed to enter.

There is no criminal investigation or inquiry against Collett, and no information suggests he was planning anything illegal. Yet his mere presence was deemed incompatible with Swedish values – an assessment that was apparently sufficient to detain him and carry out a deportation.

Instead of scrutinizing the border police’s legally questionable actions against regime critics, several Swedish establishment media outlets have seized the opportunity to attack Collett – who is described as, among other things, a dangerous “Nazi”, “white power leader” and “far-right extremist”.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

https://nordictimes.com/europe/german-police-raids-target-170-suspected-thought-criminals/

Europe

German police raids target 170 suspected thought criminals

The threat to freedom of speech

Published 26 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
10,732 hate-related cybercrimes were registered during 2024 - a 34 percent increase compared to 2023 and almost a fourfold increase since 2021.
2 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

Early morning on June 25, German police conducted over 170 house searches in a coordinated operation targeting individuals suspected of insulting government officials or expressing political views that violate current legislation.

The operation was led by the Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt) and marked the twelfth national operation against so-called politically motivated crimes of this nature.

The operation primarily targeted individuals who had published nationalist and immigration-critical content, but also individuals with links to alleged religious extremism and left-wing extremist movements.

According to reports, two-thirds of the suspects had made “far-right” statements. Several are also being investigated for violations of a paragraph in the German Criminal Code that prohibits insults against politicians – a law that has been increasingly applied in recent years.

Particularly politicians from The Green Party have, according to media reports, chosen to pursue legal action against individuals who have insulted them. The current legislation has resulted in fines for people who have called politicians “idiots” or published derogatory images.

“Digital arsonists”

The raids began at six o’clock in the morning, during which a large number of computers, mobile phones, and tablets were seized.

– Digital arsonists must not be able to hide behind their cell phones or computers, declared Herbert Reul (CDU), Interior Minister of North Rhine-Westphalia, in a comment.

– Many people have forgotten the difference between hatred and opinion, but it’s so simple: If you don’t do it in the real world, it’s not appropriate to do it digitally. It’s time for more attitude, offline and online.

According to Germany’s Federal Police, a total of 10,732 crimes related to so-called hate posts online were registered during 2024 – an increase of about 34 percent compared to the previous year. Compared to 2021, the number has almost quadrupled.

Harsh criticism

German legislation regarding alleged hate propaganda and insults has long been subject to international criticism, and high-ranking U.S. politicians have repeatedly expressed concern about how these laws affect freedom of expression. U.S. Vice President JD Vance has called them stifling and claimed they limit the possibility of free opinion formation.

At the Munich Security Conference earlier this year, Vance suggested that U.S. support for NATO could be affected by how Germany handles freedom of speech issues.

– Insulting someone is not a crime, and criminalizing speech is going to put real strain on European-US relationships. This is Orwellian, and everyone in Europe and the US must reject this lunacy, he urged on another occasion when German repression against dissidents came to light.

German politicians have defended their legal practice, claiming that the legislation aims to counter harmful rhetoric while maintaining a balance between freedom of expression and protection against hate crimes.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

https://nordictimes.com/tech/brazil-bans-rumble-accused-of-political-censorship/

Tech

Brazil bans Rumble – accused of political censorship

The threat to freedom of speech

Published 5 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
2 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

Alexandre de Moraes, a judge on Brazil’s Supreme Court, recently ordered the shutdown of the pro-free speech video platform Rumble in the country.

Rumble condemned the decision, saying it was retaliation for its refusal to censor Brazilian political dissidents abroad.

It is the latest in a series of Brazilian censorship campaigns against social media. The Nordic Times has previously reported on how Brazilian authorities – often with De Moraes at the forefront, shut down X and Telegram, among others – and introduced extensive censorship in connection with the 2022 elections.

Brazil’s Supreme Court, long accused of being deeply politicized, has justified previous shutdowns on the grounds that “hate speech” or “disinformation” is being spread on the platforms, accusing them of failing to comply with the country’s legislation. However, critics have argued that it is more a case of controlling what information citizens can access and preventing free debate.

This time it is Rumble that has been hit, with de Moraes claiming that the platform has refused to comply with previous court rulings and “repeatedly, consciously and willingly not complied, and is trying not to submit to Brazil’s legal order and judiciary”.

Among other things, Rumble allegedly ignored Brazilian demands to delete an account belonging to Allan dos Santos, a journalist and political refugee from Brazil who now resides in the United States and whom Brazilian authorities want extradited for alleged freedom of expression-related crimes.

“Unprecedented censorship”

De Moraes further argues that there is no evidence that Rumble has any regular representation on Brazilian territory – which is also a legal requirement, and that the platform should therefore not be accessible in the country.

In a statement, Rumble writes that it is facing “unprecedented censorship in Brazil” and that the judge’s action “comes in response to our refusal to censor political dissidents residing in the United States”.

“Justice de Moraes demanded that Rumble remove specific content and halt financial transactions related to individuals exercising their free speech rights under US law. Our commitment to free expression and adherence to US legal standards compelled us to reject these extraterritorial censorship demands”, the company clarifies.

Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, Rumble was launched in 2013 as a freer alternative to YouTube and made a big impact during the coronavirus crisis. It says it is exploring all legal options to lift the shutdown.

Sued by Donald Trump’s media group

It should also be noted that US President Donald Trump’s media group Trump Media & Technology Group has filed a lawsuit against the Brazilian justice in a Florida court. He is accused of violating the constitutional right to free speech of the aforementioned Allan dos Santos.

“Allowing Justice Moraes to muzzle a vocal user on an American digital outlet would jeopardize our country’s bedrock commitment to open and robust debate”, the lawsuit states.

“Neither extraterritorial dictates nor judicial overreach from abroad can override the freedoms protected by the US Constitution and law”, it adds.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

N

Polaris of Enlightenment

News

Other

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Follow TNT socials!

X-twitter Facebook Telegram Instagram

© 2022-2025 The Nordic Times TNT.
All rights reserved.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Donate

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Donate
Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.