Thursday, May 1, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Dutch opinion leader targeted by spy attack: “Someone is trying to intimidate me”

Mass surveillance

Published today 12:10
– By Editorial Staff
According to both Eva Vlaardingerbroek and Apple, it is likely that the opinion leader was attacked because of her views.

Dutch opinion maker and conservative activist Eva Vlaardingerbroek recently revealed that she had received an official warning from Apple that her iPhone had been subjected to a sophisticated attack – of the kind usually associated with advanced surveillance actors or intelligence services.

In a social media post, Vlaardingerbroek shared a screenshot of Apple’s warning and drew parallels to the Israeli spyware program Pegasus, which has been used to monitor diplomats, dissidents, and journalists, among others.

– Yesterday I got a verified threat notification from Apple stating they detected a mercenary spyware attack against my iPhone. We’re talking spyware like Pegasus.

– In the message they say that this targetted mercenary attack is probably happening because of ‘who I am and what I do’, she continues.

The term mercenary spyware is used by Apple to describe advanced surveillance technology, such as the notorious Pegasus software developed by the Israeli company NSO Group. This software can bypass mobile security systems, access calls, messages, emails, and even activate cameras or microphones without the user’s knowledge.

Prominent EU critic

Although Apple does not publicly comment on individual cases, the company has previously confirmed that such warnings are only sent when there is a “high probability” that the user has been specifically targeted. Since 2021, the notifications have mainly been sent to journalists, human rights activists, political dissidents, and officials at risk of surveillance by powerful interests.

Vlaardingerbroek has long been a prominent voice critical of the EU and has become known for her sharp criticism of EU institutions and its open-border immigration policy. She insists that the attack is likely politically motivated:

– I definitely dont know who did it. It could be anyone. This could be name a government that doesn’t like me. Name a organization that doesnt like me. Secret services, you name it.

– All I know for sure right now is that someone is trying to intimidate me. I have a message for them: It won’t work.

“There must be full transparency”

The use of Pegasus-like programs has been heavily criticized by both governments and privacy advocates. The tools, originally marketed for counterterrorism, have since been reported to be used against journalists and opposition leaders in dozens of countries.

In response, Apple sued NSO Group in 2021 and launched a system to warn users. However, the company claims that the threats are “rare” and not related to common malware.

The Vlaardingerbroek case is now raising questions about whether such technology is also being used in European domestic political conflicts, and the organization Access Now is calling on authorities in the Netherlands and at the EU level to investigate the attack.

– There must be full transparency. No one in a democratic society – regardless of political views – should be subjected to clandestine spying for expressing opinions or participating in public discourse, said a spokesperson.

Neither Apple nor the Dutch authorities have commented publicly on the case. Vlaardingerbroek says she has not yet seen any signs that data has actually been leaked, but has taken extra security measures.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Swedish government proposes wiretapping children without criminal suspicion

Mass surveillance

Published today 8:23
– By Editorial Staff
The government's own investigator proposed that only the Swedish Security Service (Säpo) should be allowed to eavesdrop on children without criminal suspicion - but this is not enough, according to the government.

Gang crime continues to plague Sweden, with recurring bombings, shootings and contract killings spreading fear in society, without those in power managing to get a grip on crime.

Criminal gangs often use minors to carry out serious crimes. For this reason, the Tidö parties (the center-right coalition government) want to give police the authority to wiretap children under the age of 15 – even in cases where there is no specific suspicion of a crime.

During a press conference the government stated that the social trend is bleak, that “serious crime is penetrating lower and lower down the age scale” and that children are increasingly “playing central roles in the commission of serious crimes“.

Currently, police are not allowed to use “secret coercive measures” against children under the age of 15 – which allegedly hinders police work when investigating murders and bombings.

At a press conference on Wednesday, representatives of the Tidö parties confirmed that they want to change the legislation so that children can also be wiretapped – partly when they are being investigated for crimes – but also for “preventive purposes” – i.e. without any actual suspicion of crime.

These are far-reaching proposals. But it is justified by the development of society, said Minister for Justice Gunnar Strömmer (M), and continued:

– It is about preventing crime, but also about reaching those who are behind and controlling via children’s cell phones.

Dismisses own investigator’s limitations

The government’s own legal investigator had recommended that only the Swedish Security Service (Säpo) be allowed to use wiretapping without suspicion of a crime. However, the government disagrees, arguing that it is “absolutely necessary” for regular police to also be allowed to wiretap children if they can be linked to serious organized crime.

The government maintains that fighting gang crime is more important than protecting the integrity of minors. Strömmer stated that “there are very significant risks in allowing the current reality to continue as it is”.

The change in the law is proposed to come into force this fall for at least five years, after which it will be evaluated.

Although most people seem to agree that organized crime needs to be fought, many are also opposed to the fact that the moderate-led government repeatedly chooses to focus so much on increased wiretapping and surveillance. Critics also point out that there is a real risk that the surveillance apparatus will be abused in the future or used very arbitrarily and without legal certainty.

Amazon updates privacy settings – all voice data to be stored in the cloud

Mass surveillance

Published 26 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Amazon itself states that it saves users' calls in order to improve the service.

As of March 28, some Echo devices will no longer be able to process voice data locally – all voice information will be sent to Amazon’s cloud service, regardless of the user’s will.

Echo is a series of smart devices, including speakers, developed by Amazon. The device records what you say and sends it to Amazon’s servers to be stored and analyzed, allegedly to improve the service. Privacy settings have previously allowed some devices to process voice data locally without sending it to Amazon.

In an email to Echo users, shared on Reddit, Amazon announced that the ability to process voice commands locally is being removed. Instead, all recordings will be sent to the cloud for processing, as Sweclockers has reported.

If the user doesn’t actively change their settings before March 28, they will automatically be set to “do not save data”. This means that Amazon will still collect and process your voice information, but that this will be deleted after Alexa handles the request. However, it is unclear how long the information will be stored before it is actually deleted.

Amazon states that voice data is needed to train the company’s AI model, Alexa Plus. At the same time, the company promises that all previously saved voice data will be deleted if the user has the “do not save data” feature enabled.

The tech mogul on the future of AI: Constant mass surveillance

Mass surveillance

Published 24 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
With the help of AI, Ellison believes that in the future, those in power will be able to follow citizens' every move.

Tech giant Oracle’s CEO Larry Ellison believes in a future where artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of a borderless mass surveillance society where privacy no longer exists and where everything citizens do is mapped and recorded.

Oracle and Larry Ellison will play a key role in Trump’s AI venture “Stargate” expected to cost upwards of $500 billion and described by the President himself as “by far the largest AI infrastructure project in history”.

There is no doubt that Ellison is one of the world’s most successful tech moguls just last fall he overtook Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to become the world’s second richest man after Elon Musk. But how does he see the future of artificial intelligence and how it will affect our lives?

During a meeting with financial analysts last fall, he predicted a future that critics say is reminiscent of dark dystopian novels like George Orwell’s 1984, where humans are subject to constant mass surveillance and AI is used to map citizens’ every move.

According to Ellison, it is highly likely that in the future, AI models will be used to analyze in real time all the material not only from surveillance cameras, police body cameras, but also from car cameras and doorbells.

Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.

Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times, and if there’s a problem, AI will report the problem and report it to the appropriate person, he continued.

“Big brother is watching you”

The multi-billionaire also believes that AI-controlled drones will replace real police officers during car chases and other types of crime and disorder.

– If something happens in a shopping center, a drone goes out there and reaches the scene way faster than a police car.

Technology website Ars Technica’s writer Benji Edwards is one of many who reacted strongly to Ellison’s vision of AI surveillance, saying his comments raise questions about the future of citizens’ privacy and right to privacy.

Ellison’s vision bears more than a passing resemblance to the cautionary world portrayed in George Orwell’s prescient novel 1984. In Orwell’s fiction, the totalitarian government of Oceania uses ubiquitous ‘telescreens’ to monitor citizens constantly, creating a society where privacy no longer exists and independent thought becomes nearly impossible“, Edwards notes.

But Orwell’s famous phrase ‘Big Brother is watching you’ would take on new meaning in Ellison’s tech-driven scenario, where AI systems, rather than human watchers, would serve as the ever-vigilant eyes of authority. Once considered a sci-fi trope, automated systems are already becoming a reality: Similar automated CCTV surveillance systems have already been trialed in London Underground and at the 2024 Olympics“, he continues.

“A slave obeys”

He points out that automated surveillance systems have already been implemented in Chinese cities, among others, and that AI software is already available that can sort and organize the data collected on residents using a network of deployed surveillance cameras.

According to many observers, similar and even more advanced solutions may soon become part of everyday life in the United States and other countries, and there are warnings that a “digital dictatorship” is emerging where the surveillance state is so all-encompassing that it is impossible for anyone to escape.

“‘Good Behavior’ as defined by the billionaires who own and control everything. Otherwise known as blind obedience and willful subservience to their every whim and want. Because a slave obeys, expresses one of many worried voices.

“I have nothing to hide”

Mass surveillance

Ten reasons privacy matters for everyone.

Published 8 January 2025
– By Naomi Brockwell
Is there nothing in your life that is actually private and concerns you and only you?

Challenging the myth

“I have nothing to hide”. It’s a phrase we’ve all heard, and perhaps even said ourselves, when privacy comes up. But it reveals a dangerous misunderstanding of what privacy is and why it matters.

Privacy isn’t about hiding—it’s about control. It’s about having the freedom to decide who gets access to your data and how it’s used. Over the last decade, that freedom has eroded. Today, governments, corporations, and hackers routinely collect and exploit our personal information, often without our consent.

Worse still, the narrative around privacy has shifted. Those who value it are seen as secretive, even criminal, while surveillance is sold to us as a tool for safety and transparency. This mindset benefits only those who profit from our data.

It’s time to push back. Here are 10 arguments you can use the next time someone says, “I have nothing to hide”.

1. Privacy is about consent, not secrecy

Privacy isn’t about hiding secrets—it’s about having control over your information. It’s the ability to decide for yourself who gets access to your data.

We don’t have to hand over all our personal information just because it’s requested. Tools like email aliases, VoIP numbers, and masked credit cards allow us to protect our data while still using online services. Privacy-focused companies like ProtonMail or Signal respect this principle, giving you more control over your information.

2. Nothing to hide, everything to protect

Even if you think you have nothing to hide, you have everything to protect. Oversharing data makes you vulnerable to hackers, scammers, and malicious actors.

For example:

  • Hackers can use personal details like your home address or purchase history to commit fraud or even locate you.
  • Data brokers can manipulate you with targeted content and even influence your political beliefs, as seen in the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Protecting your data is about safeguarding yourself from these threats and protecting your autonomy.

3. Your data is forever

Data collected about you today will still exist decades from now. Governments change, laws evolve, and what’s harmless now could be used against you or your children in the future.

Surveillance infrastructure rarely disappears once it’s built. Limiting the data collected about you now is essential for protecting yourself from unknown risks down the line.

4. It’s not about you

Privacy isn’t just a personal issue—it’s about protecting others. Activists, journalists, and whistleblowers rely on privacy to do their work safely. By dismissing privacy, you’re ignoring the people for whom it’s a matter of life and death.

For example, Pegasus spyware has been used to track and silence journalists and activists. We should be leaning in to privacy tools, supporting the privacy ecosystem, and ensuring that those helping to keep our society free and safe are protected, whether we personally feel like we need privacy or not.

5. Surveillance isn’t about criminals

The claim that surveillance is “only for catching bad guys” is a myth. Once surveillance tools are deployed, they almost always expand beyond their original purpose.

History has shown how governments use surveillance to target dissenters, minorities, and anyone challenging the status quo. Privacy isn’t just for criminals—it’s a safeguard against abuse of power.

6. Your choices put others at risk

When you disregard privacy, you expose not just yourself but also the people around you.

For example:

  • Using apps that access your contact list can leak your friends’ and family’s phone numbers and addresses without their consent.
  • Insisting on non-private communication tools can expose sensitive conversations to surveillance or data breaches.
  • Uploading your photos to a non-private cloud like Google Drive allows those in your photos to be identified using facial recognition, and profiled based on information Google AI sees in your photos.

Respecting privacy isn’t just about protecting yourself—it’s about respecting the privacy boundaries of others.

7. Privacy is not dead

For some people, “I have nothing to hide” is a coping mechanism.
“Privacy is dead, so why bother?”

This defeatist attitude is both false and harmful. Privacy is alive—it’s a choice we can make every day. Let’s stop disempowering others by convincing them they shouldn’t even try.

There are countless privacy tools you can incorporate into your life. By choosing these tools, you take back control over your information and send a clear message that privacy matters.

8. Your data can be weaponized

All it takes is one bad actor—a rogue employee, an ex-partner, or a hacker—to turn your data against you. From revenge hacking to identity theft, the consequences of oversharing are real and dangerous.

Limiting the amount of data collected about you reduces your vulnerability and makes it harder for others to exploit your information.

9. Surveillance stifles creativity and dissent

Surveillance doesn’t just invade your privacy—it affects how you think and behave. Studies show that people censor themselves when they know they’re being watched.

This “chilling effect” stifles creativity, innovation, and dissent. Without privacy, we lose the ability to think freely, explore controversial ideas, and push back against authority.

10. Your choices send a signal

Every decision you make about technology sends a message. Choosing privacy-focused companies tells the market, “This matters”. It encourages innovation and creates demand for tools that protect individual freedom.

Conversely, supporting data-harvesting companies reinforces the status quo and pushes privacy-focused alternatives out of the market. When people say “I have nothing to hide” instead of leaning into the privacy tools around them, it ignores the role we all play in shaping the future of society.

Takeaways: Why privacy matters

  1. Privacy is about consent, not secrecy. It’s your right to control who accesses your data.
  2. You have everything to protect. Data breaches and scams are real threats.
  3. Data is forever. What’s collected today could harm you tomorrow.
  4. Privacy protects others. Journalists and activists depend on it to do their work safely.
  5. Surveillance tools expand. They rarely stop at targeting criminals.
  6. Your choices matter. Privacy tools send a message to the market and inspire change.
  7. Privacy isn’t dead. We have tools to protect ourselves—it’s up to us to use them.

A fight we can’t afford to lose

Privacy isn’t about hiding—it’s about protecting your rights, your choices, and your future. Surveillance is a weapon that can silence opposition, suppress individuality, and enforce conformity. Without privacy, we lose the freedom to dissent, innovate, and live without fear.

The next time someone says, “I have nothing to hide”, remind them: privacy is normal. It’s necessary. And it’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Youtube.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.