Saturday, June 21, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Switzerland may abandon neutrality – after 500 years

The new cold war

Published 3 September 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Schweiziska soldater.
3 minute read

After more than 500 years of strict neutrality, Switzerland may be facing a fundamental shift in its security policy. A recent report commissioned by the Swiss Ministry of Defense recommends that the country reconsider its principle of neutrality and consider closer cooperation with both the EU and NATO.

The proposals have provoked strong reactions both inside and outside Switzerland, forcing the nation, which has been a beacon of neutrality since 1515, to confront its historic role as a neutral state in an increasingly polarized political environment, Politico reports.

The report, released last Thursday, has already sparked considerable debate. The group of experts that wrote the report, consisting of diplomats, politicians and security experts, proposes over 100 measures to strengthen Switzerland’s security.

Among the most high-profile recommendations is a call to deepen cooperation with NATO and the EU to create a “common defense capability” and to increase the defense budget from 0.76% of GDP to 1% by 2030.

“Since the Russian attack on Ukraine, neutrality has once again become the subject of political debate, both at home and abroad. Pressure on Switzerland to clarify its position is growing”, the report says, calling for a “revision” of its neutrality policy.

The report’s conclusions are largely driven by the changing security situation in Europe, where the war in Ukraine has redrawn the geopolitical map. The report stresses that Switzerland, despite its neutrality, “can no longer remain isolated from the larger security structures in Europe”.

Strong criticism from all sides

However, the report was met with strong criticism. The opposition Swiss People’s Party (SVP) has openly condemned the proposals, accusing the expert group of being politically biased. In a statement, the party claims that the report shows a “lack of respect for our country’s constitutionally guaranteed perpetual … neutrality”.

The SVP also claims that Defense Minister Viola Amherd, who commissioned the report, deliberately appointed pro-NATO and pro-EU experts to pave the way for a change in security policy.

The current Swiss defense policy has also caused problems in relations with other European countries, especially in the area of arms exports.

Switzerland currently bans the sale of weapons to countries at war, which has led to several European countries being prevented from sending weapons with Swiss components to Ukraine.

The report recommends lifting this re-export ban to “facilitate international cooperation”, arguing that this is “necessary to strengthen the Swiss arms industry and gain access to EU and NATO procurement programs”.

Clear shift

The report’s findings reveal a clear shift in the security policy debate in Switzerland.

The country has been firmly anchored in the principle of neutrality for decades, and while the experts do not suggest a complete abandonment of neutrality, they clearly argue that Switzerland should move closer to Western security alliances through joint exercises and defense cooperation.

Jean-Marc Rickli, head of global and emerging risks at the Geneva Center for Security Policy, said in a statement that Switzerland should work with EU countries.

– There’s a reputational element of Switzerland potentially seen as a free rider who doesn’t cooperate with European states. If it wants to benefit from the help of its European partners, it has to give something back.

The report’s proposals are far from settled, however, and will certainly continue to face opposition from both the left and the right of the political spectrum. But the fact that Switzerland is now openly discussing such a change in its defense policy is in itself a remarkable situation.

The question of how Switzerland should relate to the EU and NATO in particular is likely to be central to the shaping of its security policy in the coming years.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Denmark signs defense pact enabling US military presence in Greenland and Faroe Islands

The new cold war

Published 12 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen looks forward to enhanced cooperation with the US.
3 minute read

The Danish Parliament has voted through an agreement granting the US access to Danish military bases – including military infrastructure in the autonomous regions of Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Critics warn of a slide in Danish sovereignty, while the government describes the agreement as a necessary step.

With a broad majority – 94 votes in favor and 11 against – the Danish parliament this week adopted a new defense agreement with the US. The agreement gives US forces the right to use several military facilities on Danish soil, including Karup, Skrydstrup, and Aalborg, as well as access to areas in the Faroe Islands and Greenland.

According to the Danish government, the agreement aims to strengthen Denmark’s cooperation with the US within the framework of NATO. Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen emphasizes that the agreement does not imply a permanent troop presence, but rather logistical capabilities and operational flexibility.

The Ministry of Defense emphasizes that the US military presence is seen as a way to be ready to respond quickly to crises in the Arctic and North Atlantic – areas that have become more important militarily as the security situation has changed.

The agreement has also attracted criticism from several quarters. Particularly controversial is the clause stipulating that US military personnel will be subject to US jurisdiction, even if they commit crimes against civilians in Denmark. Several opposition politicians have pointed out that this undermines the rule of law and goes against Danish legal tradition.

Shortly before the vote, the leader of the Unity List, Pelle Dragsted, said that the agreement is “harmful to the country”.

It is an agreement that means that we will have areas in Denmark that are under American jurisdiction. Where Danish authorities cannot exercise control. And where mistreatment of prisoners can occur. It is a gigantic failure towards the Danish population.

With the country’s new DCA agreement with the US, Danish soldiers can expect to see a significant increase in the American presence in Denmark. Photo: 7th Army Training Command/CC BY 2.0

Superpower logic guides decisions

Others believe that the agreement represents a step toward Denmark effectively ceding parts of its territory to a foreign power.

Greenland and the Faroe Islands, both of which have extensive self-government, have been formally informed of the agreement, but neither the Faroese Lagting nor the Greenlandic Inatsisartut have had the right to block the decision. This has led to further criticism, as many see it as Copenhagen bypassing local interests in favor of superpower logic.

In the background is also the geopolitical shift underway in the Arctic, where Russia, China, and the US are all trying to strengthen their positions. The US has previously shown interest in Greenland not least after Donald Trump’s much-publicized proposal to buy the island and considers it to be of strategic importance for surveillance and control of the North Atlantic.

The Danish government sees the agreement as a necessary adaptation to a new reality.

– The problem is not too much involvement from the US in Europe. On the contrary, the risk is that the US will withdraw and move troops away or stop donations to Ukraine, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said earlier this week.

At the same time, there are growing concerns that Denmark is also making itself more vulnerable both politically and militarily in the event of a future conflict between major powers.

The Folketing’s decision therefore marks not only a deepening of cooperation with the US, but also a change in Denmark’s attitude toward military alliances and sovereignty—a choice that is far from comfortable for all Danes.

Tulsi Gabbard: The warmongers are driving the world to nuclear holocaust

The new cold war

Published 11 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Tulsi Gabbard has previously accused NATO leaders of being "insane" and of trying to drag humanity into a third world war.
3 minute read

US National Intelligence Officer Tulsi Gabbard warns in a grim video message of the risk of a full-scale nuclear war.

She sharply criticizes “the political elite warmongers” and accuses them of pushing the world “closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before”.

In the three-minute video clip, Gabbard talks about her recent visit to Hiroshima, Japan, where she studied the aftermath of the US nuclear attack on the city in 1945. The video mixes images from the trip with archive footage of the victims of the bombing and shows Gabbard speaking directly to the camera about the consequences of a modern nuclear attack.

Gabbard points out that today’s nuclear weapons are significantly more powerful than those used in World War II.

– A single nuclear weapon today could kill millions in just minutes, she explains, continuing:

– This is the reality of what’s at stake, what we are facing now. Because as we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers.

“Up to us – the people”

Gabbard further suggests that powerful people are convinced that they would have access to “nuclear shelters” and therefore believe themselves to be protected from the consequences of a nuclear war.

– It’s up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness. We must reject this path to nuclear war and work toward a world where no one has to live in fear of a nuclear holocaust, she concludes.

It is unclear exactly when the video was recorded, but Gabbard visited Japan last week, including an American military base together with the US ambassador to the country. However, according to her staff, she did not visit Hiroshima during her first visit to Japan as director of intelligence in March.

When asked to clarify her statements, Gabbard’s deputy chief of staff, Alexa Henning, responded that President Donald Trump also shares her concern about a future nuclear war.

President Trump has repeatedly stated in the past that he recognizes the immeasurable suffering, and annihilation can be caused by nuclear war, which is why he has been unequivocal that we all need to do everything possible to work towards peace”, Henning said in a written statement, adding that Gabbard supports Trump’s goal of lasting peace and stability.

“Trying to drag us into World War III”

This is not the first time the former Democratic congresswoman and presidential candidate has warned that a nuclear war could be imminent – and she has also strongly criticized politicians and military leaders for their warmongering.

During her 2019 presidential campaign, she said the world was “on the brink of nuclear war”, and in Congress she was a strong advocate for nuclear disarmament and renewed international agreements.

As recently as 2023, she also accused leading representatives of the US, NATO, and Ukraine of having ambitions to start a third world war and risk the survival of all humanity.

The warmongers are trying to drag us into World War III, which can only end one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we passively allow them to lead us into this holocaust like sheep to the slaughter”, she warned on X.

Welfare may be sacrificed as Denmark ramps up military spending

The new cold war

Published 3 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has pledged to invest billions of euros in upgrading the country's military forces.
3 minute read

Denmark is preparing to significantly increase its defense spending to meet NATO’s new targets – but the bill will be steep.

According to estimates from Aarhus University, the upgrade will require an additional 90 billion DDK (€12 billion) on top of current levels. The question now is where the money will come from – and what will have to be sacrificed in return.

This will be something that individual Danes will actually notice, Bo Sandemann Rasmussen, professor of economics at Aarhus University, told TV 2.

After a summit in Vilnius, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen announced that Denmark is ready to increase its defense spending to 3.5 percent of GDP and allocate an additional 1.5 percent to other security-related activities such as cybersecurity, border protection, and coastal defense.

In total, five percent of the country’s gross domestic product would go to security – more than double the current target of two percent.

But according to the professor, this would require an additional DDK 90 billion (€12 billion) in the budget – money that can hardly be found in the so-called economic reform space.

It seems increasingly unlikely that we can count on covering 90 billion, he estimates.

Cuts in welfare?

Denmark has already significantly increased its defense spending since the war in Ukraine began, reaching around 2.4 percent of GDP in 2023 – equivalent to €9 billion. But to reach five percent, significantly more is needed – and that will have consequences.

The population is aging, which requires more resources for public services. If we want to maintain today’s level of service, we will probably need to find new sources of funding, says the economist.

He believes that the political choice now is between cutting public spending or raising taxes, for example by introducing a special war tax.

– It’s hard to see how we wouldn’t need a tax increase to reach 90 billion. After all, it’s a very large sum.

“Other things we can’t afford”

To put the figure into perspective, Denmark spent an equivalent of €21 billion on education and €2 billion on the police in 2023. A €12 billion upgrade is therefore equivalent to six times the entire police budget.

If the amount is lower than that, it may be more realistic to finance it, but then there are other things we cannot afford, explains Rasmussen.

A formal decision on the new defense targets is expected at the NATO summit in The Hague at the end of June. Until then, the question remains as to which areas of welfare will be cut back – and how much Danish households themselves will have to pay.

Demands from the US

It should be noted that Denmark is not the only NATO country currently spending billions on military buildup – investments that in many places are being financed by cuts in welfare.

The Trump administration is demanding that Europe and Canada take greater “responsibility” for the continent’s defense, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has declared that he wants member countries’ military budgets to amount to approximately five percent of GDP.

Two percent is a start, as President Trump has Trump has said, but it’s not enough, nor is three percent, nor is four percent. More like five percent, he emphasized earlier this year, calling on NATO countries to make “real investments”.

UK invests billions in new arms factories

The new cold war

Published 2 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
BAE Systems, based in the UK, is Europe's largest arms manufacturer, employing more than 83 000 people and producing, among other things, the Challenger tank.
2 minute read

The UK will invest $2 billion in new arms factories as part of a major military buildup, Defense Secretary John Healey announces ahead of the government’s Strategic Defense Review tomorrow.

The investment includes at least six new ammunition and explosives factories, as well as the purchase of over 7,000 domestically produced long-range weapons, including drones and missiles.

– The hard-fought lessons from Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine show a military is only as strong as the industry that stands behind it, said Healey.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer also underlines the need to respond to alleged threats from states with advanced military capabilities singling out Russia, Iran and North Korea in particular.

– We are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, so we must be ready to fight and win, he declares.

The investment is also said to be aimed at stimulating the economy, and will see the UK spend a total of around £6 billion on munitions during the current parliamentary term.

AI to improve decision-making in combat

– We welcome investment in new munitions factories, but we don’t know when they will be ready – only that these orders should have been placed months ago, said James Cartlidge, defense spokesman for the Liberal Conservative opposition.

The UK, one of Ukraine’s most generous funders, has decided to raise its defense budget to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with a long-term goal of 3% by 2034.

Meanwhile, Moscow warns of rising tensions and accuses former prime minister Boris Johnson of sabotaging the 2022 peace talks and pressuring Ukraine to leave a claim he denies.

Meanwhile, the UK government has announced it will invest billions in artificial intelligence to improve decision-making on the battlefield and has committed to spending an additional £1.5 billion to improve the country’s military housing.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.