Saturday, October 11, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Comment: EU sanctions package against Russia has backfired

The new cold war

Another package of sanctions was pushed through in Brussels to the applause of Finance Minister Svantesson. Unfortunately, this does not change the fact that Sweden and Europe are the big losers.

Published 4 August 2024
– By Jenny Piper
US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken at this year's Davos meeting. Sweden's Minister for Finance Elisabeth Svantesson during the budget walk to the right.
4 minute read
This is an opinion piece. The author is responsible for the views expressed in the article.

Elisabeth Svantesson, Sweden’s finance minister, is doing her best to convince the public that continued sanctions against Russia are a good thing. Last week, she and several other EU finance ministers wrote an article in The Guardian saying that economic sanctions against Russia are working and that Putin is lying about Russia’s economy being in good shape. Today she speaks out on the same issue in DN, saying that she has long been bothered by the fact that a false picture of the Russian economy is being spread, one that Putin wants us to believe.

According to the IMF, the Russian economy is growing, with GDP growth of 3.2% this year, which is higher than in Germany, the US and the UK.

However, Svantesson claims that this is propaganda, that Russia’s economy is now struggling and that this shows that the sanctions are working, while at the same time she makes the platitude that “we have to hold on and persevere both in terms of sanctions and support”. According to Svantesson, there is reason to nuance the picture, which is why the National Institute of Economic Research has now been commissioned to analyze economic developments in Russia.

The fact that several experts and analysts have declared in various contexts over the past year that the EU’s sanctions against Russia have failed and are only harming their own countries does not seem to have affected Svantesson and the other EU finance ministers, who are thus firmly asserting the opposite, while at the same time pushing through yet another sanctions package that has been given the green light in Brussels.

Svantesson is really trying to convince the population that continued sanctions are a good thing.

Interestingly, former US Naval Intelligence Officer and former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter said in an interview that it was the US that was behind the EU’s decision to start sanctioning Russia, which was linked to the Minsk peace agreement on Ukraine – an agreement that France, Germany and Ukraine never intended to implement.

– The EU’s sanctions package against Russia has backfired and become one of the biggest economic disasters in modern European history. These sanctions, designed to punish Russia, have failed to do so. In fact, like a boomerang, they have hit back at Europe, which continues to move forward while imposing more and more sanctions, all while Russia is getting stronger economically.

The EU is the economic arm of a group of organizations and institutions that includes NATO, all of which are basically working on behalf of the United States.

So the sanctions implemented by the EU were done because the US wanted Russia to be isolated and confronted by Ukraine, which was de facto acting as a proxy for NATO.

America is using the sanctions to achieve a larger strategic goal, not only to weaken Russia but also to weaken Europe, so that the US comes out of this conflict stronger.

It has been the US goal for decades to break Europe from its dependence on cheap Russian energy. So the sanctions and the backlash are achieving that result. Perhaps Europe doesn’t realize this, or they haven’t woken up to the reality that the US is not their friend.

Gunnar Beck, an outgoing MEP for the Alternative for Germany party as well as a lawyer and academic specializing in EU law, shares Ritter’s view and states that the EU shot itself in the foot by deciding to impose sanctions on Russia.

– There is no doubt that the economic impact of the sanctions is felt to a much greater extent here in the EU itself compared to Russia. I mean, the Russian economy, according to official data, is doing very well and they just seem to have adapted to the sanctions.

EU sanctions on Russian commodities, including oil and gas, have mainly hurt European economies that used to rely on predictable, high-quality and cheap gas and oil imports from Russia. These economies still cannot do without importing oil and gas from Russia, but they now do so through third countries at much higher prices, while Russia continues to sell its oil and gas.

So the EU has basically hurt itself with these sanctions, or to be more precise, the bloc has massively hurt European industry and European consumers. But it doesn’t seem to have had much impact on the Russian economy. The sanctions have not had the effect the EU hoped for, which was predictable. The EU probably underestimated the extent to which the Russian government had prepared for possible sanctions, including far-reaching restrictions on energy imports to the EU as well as financial transactions.

But according to Svantesson, our government and various EU ministers in Brussels, this is false information that can be explained away as “propaganda”.

So when will the people of Europe realize that the US is not our friend, but someone who is using us for their own benefit? And when will the harsh reality set in, showing how our leaders have helped bring about the collapse of Europe for financial reward and the promise of future supremacy?

When will the people of Europe realize that the US is not our friend, but someone who is using us for their own benefit?

That the fools who rule Sweden will realize and repent is not on the map, because we have already sold out the country to the United States through them and put us on the scaffold. The sleeping Swedes also continue to trust the corrupt politicians with great confidence in the controlled mass media, so there will certainly be no awakening here.

Unfortunately, all we can do is watch the misery.

 

Jenny Piper

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Finland faces multimillion lawsuit over illegal boarding of Eagle S

The new cold war

Published 3 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The Eagle S was dramatically boarded on Christmas night 2024 – an action that the court has now determined lacked legal basis.
4 minute read

Helsinki District Court rules that Finland lacked jurisdiction to prosecute the crew of oil tanker Eagle S.

Harsh criticism is now directed at authorities’ boarding of the vessel in international waters – an action that risks becoming very costly for Finnish taxpayers.

The ruling from Helsinki District Court is a heavy setback for Finnish authorities who dramatically boarded the oil tanker Eagle S in international waters last year. The district court establishes that Finland simply lacked the right to prosecute the crew for the alleged cable breaks.

Captain Davit Vadatchkoria and officers Robert Egizaryan and Santosh Kumar Chaurasia were charged with aggravated sabotage and aggravated disruption of postal and telecommunications traffic. The charges also included alternative, lesser criminal classifications: sabotage, aggravated vandalism and causing public danger.

But since the cable breaks – which involved five underwater cables – occurred outside Finland’s territorial waters, Finnish criminal law cannot be applied, the court states.

“International waters – period”

Lawyer Herman Ljungberg, who represents shipping company Caravella FZ LLC, has consistently argued that the action was illegal.

— The damage occurred in international waters, period. Therefore Finland has nothing to do with the matter. Only the flag state, in this case the Cook Islands, has jurisdiction, he tells Svenska Yle.

Ljungberg goes further and calls the incident an illegal hijacking.

— The boarding should absolutely be investigated. We already filed a police report about the boarding at an earlier stage, but it was left without investigation, he says.

District court refers to maritime law convention

In its ruling, the district court states that the incident was an accident and refers to articles in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The court does note that the act according to the charges had caused “exceptionally large” economic damage, but still establishes that a Finnish court cannot try the case.

The court’s conclusion underscores the inappropriateness of the authorities’ actions: They boarded a vessel in international waters, held it for over two months and brought charges – despite lacking jurisdiction.

Taxpayers will pay the bill

The direct cost of the failed legal process already amounts to €193,000 in legal costs that the Finnish state must reimburse the three acquitted defendants.

But that could be the beginning of a significantly more expensive bill. The shipping company is preparing extensive damage claims.

— It could involve damages of tens of millions of euros. The shipping company believes the Finnish state owes them money due to the illegal hijacking of the vessel, says Ljungberg.

He points to the cargo – primarily unleaded gasoline – allegedly being damaged during the months the vessel was held, as well as lost rental income while the ship stood idle outside Sköldvik, Finland.

“Shadow fleet” – a loaded term without clear definition

The case has been characterized by strong words and dramatic headlines. When the EU introduced new sanctions in May 2025 against what is called “the Russian shadow fleet,” Eagle S was placed on a list of so-called shadow vessels.

The term “shadow vessel” or “shadow fleet” is used by politicians and in media, but there is no unified, official definition of what is meant. The concept generally seems to refer to older vessels with complicated ownership structures that transport Russian oil, possibly to circumvent international sanctions.

That a vessel appears on the EU’s sanctions list does not, however, affect the question of jurisdiction. In the Eagle S case, the court establishes that Finland lacked the right to prosecute the crew, regardless of the vessel’s status as a listed shadow ship.

What happens now?

The prosecutors, represented by Deputy Prosecutor General Jukka Rappe, have not yet commented on the ruling. Rappe has previously unsuccessfully tried to justify why Finland should have jurisdiction:

— In this case, the cable capacity has been so large that in my opinion it is clear that data communication and the electrical system have been affected in Finland. Therefore the act is considered to have been performed in Finland even though the location where the cables were cut lies outside Finnish borders, Rappe told Svenska Yle in August.

Now prosecutors face the choice of appealing to the Court of Appeal or accepting defeat.

It is also possible that the Cook Islands, as flag state for Eagle S, chooses to take over the investigation – if they would even consider there is a case to investigate.

For the three crew members, who spent months in Finland with travel bans and obligations to report to police weekly, the matter is now over. But for the Finnish state and taxpayers, the consequences of the hasty boarding could prove far more costly than those responsible originally imagined.

Norwegian-led training base for Ukrainian soldiers opened in Poland

The new cold war

Published 2 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
EU representatives visit Camp Jomsborg during the opening ceremony.
2 minute read

A Norwegian-led training center for Ukrainian troops has opened in southeastern Poland. Camp Jomsborg can accommodate up to 1,200 soldiers at a time and will focus on drone warfare.

The facility in Nowa Dęba-Lipa was inaugurated on Wednesday in the presence of defense ministers from Norway and Estonia, as well as representatives from Lithuania, Latvia, Sweden, Finland, Iceland and Denmark.

Camp Jomsborg, built by engineers from Norway’s Brigade Nord, represents another escalation of Western support for Ukraine since the war with Russia broke out in 2022. Poland has since become a central hub for logistics and training of Ukrainian forces.

According to Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, the training will be conducted by instructors from allied NATO countries, with particular focus on modern drone technology.

— There is no other army in the world as well trained in drones and counter-drone systems as Ukraine’s, he claimed at the inauguration ceremony.

Around 250 Norwegian soldiers are already stationed at the site, and five rotations of 500 troops each are planned for next year. Estonia has also sent personnel, and more nations are expected to follow.

“Not a one-way street”

Kosiniak-Kamysz argued that the cooperation not only benefits Ukraine, but that the allied countries also benefit from Ukrainian combat experience.

— This is not a one-way street. An important element is that we will draw on Ukrainian experience. Right next to us is a drone launch strip, the defense minister said.

He emphasized that the base symbolizes NATO countries’ unity and claimed that “peace requires strength, skill, training, a well-prepared army, a strong alliance and resilient societies”.

On the same day as the inauguration, EU leaders agreed to create a so-called “drone wall” along the bloc’s eastern flank, following claims from Poland and Estonia about Russian airspace violations. Moscow has dismissed the accusations as groundless and accused the EU of trying to incite a war against Russia.

Hungary: Brussels prepares for war – and Europeans will pay the price

The new cold war

Published 2 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó sounds the alarm: EU leadership under Ursula von der Leyen is sacrificing Europe for Ukraine.
2 minute read

“Brussels is preparing for war and they want Europeans to pay the price”, writes Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó in a harsh attack against the EU’s new seven-year budget.

He warns that the union’s power holders are prioritizing Ukraine’s military over Europe’s own and very urgent problems.

In the post, published ahead of the informal EU summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, Szijjártó emphasized that Europe’s security and economic situation has deteriorated sharply as a result of failed decisions in Brussels.

“Brussels is preparing for war, and they want Europeans, including Hungarians, to pay the price. The proposed budget for the next seven years is much more about Ukraine than about the European Union itself”, wrote Szijjártó.

He described the draft as “a Ukraine budget”, focused on arming the country and keeping its state structure alive, while Europe’s own urgent needs are neglected. Instead, Brussels should address declining competitiveness, secure energy supply, and rebuild the foundations for European growth, he argued.

“But instead, the European Commission wants to send European taxpayers’ money – including Hungarians’ money – to Ukraine, to finance the Ukrainian state and military”, the minister warned.

Wants to see “patriotic shift”

Szijjártó emphasized that Hungary rejects the idea that the country’s citizens’ money should be used for war efforts.

“We don’t want Hungarian taxpayers’ money to be sent to Ukraine, we don’t want it to be spent on war, and we don’t want it to cover the arming and operation of the Ukrainian military”, Szijjártó explained further.

The minister concluded by stating that the EU can only change course if a “patriotic shift” occurs in Brussels.

“Until then, Brussels will remain committed to pro-war, pro-migration, and pro-gender policies. But we don’t want war, we don’t want migration, we don’t want gender madness, and we don’t want Hungarians’ money to be siphoned off to Ukraine”, he wrote.

The day before Szijjártó’s statement, on September 30, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán directed harsh criticism at Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in a post on X.

“Dear Donald Tusk, You may think that you are at war with Russia, but Hungary is not. Neither is the European Union. You are playing a dangerous game with the lives and security of millions of Europeans. This is very bad!” Orbán emphasized.

Stoltenberg’s call: Sacrifice welfare to stop Putin

The war in Ukraine

Published 1 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Jens Stoltenberg meets Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
2 minute read

Norway’s finance minister and former NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg says that Western Europe must continue sending billions to Ukraine – even if this comes at the expense of citizens’ healthcare and welfare.

— I know that one additional billion to Ukraine or one billion extra to national defense is one billion less to other good purposes like health, education and infrastructure. But we must remember that the highest cost is to let Putin win, said Stoltenberg during the conference Warsaw Security Forum on Tuesday.

Stoltenberg, who led the US-led military alliance from 2014 to 2024, is now Norway’s finance minister and during the forum he revealed that Norway under his leadership has tripled military support to Ukraine and significantly increased its own defense spending.

His statements align with the military alliance’s current Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who has previously urged member countries to cut welfare in order to increase support to Kiev further.

Stoltenberg was NATO chief when the Ukraine conflict escalated into a full-scale war in February 2022. Even before the invasion, he had pushed for Ukrainian NATO membership and NATO-adapted infrastructure in the country – measures that according to Russia provoked the war.

“Starting to talk about a third world war”

After the 2022 invasion, Stoltenberg intensified demands that Ukraine should be admitted to the alliance and urged member countries to increase their military and financial support to the country.

Several Western European governments have dramatically increased their military spending over the past year, citing the alleged threat from Russia. At the same time, many European countries are struggling with strained welfare systems and demands for savings at home.

Moscow categorically denies plans to attack NATO or EU countries and claims that these allegations are used as a pretext to justify military investments at the expense of welfare.

— Some officials in NATO and the EU are beginning to seriously talk about a third world war as a potential scenario, warns Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, accusing the West of fueling anti-Russian hysteria.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.