Oil mogul to lead UN climate summit

The globalist agenda

Published December 1, 2023 – By Editorial staff

A chairman described as a corrupt oil mogul, BlackRock and Rothschild executives serving as advisors, alarms over lobbyists and the fossil industry trying to influence decision-making and climate policy, along with demands for the populations of the Western world to reduce meat consumption. The UN climate summit, COP28, is marked by oddities and controversies.

The UN climate summit COP28 kicked off yesterday in the oil-rich United Arab Emirates. The conference's official focus is primarily on "the global review of global climate work" and "the phasing out of fossil fuels", with representatives from the Swedish government in attendance.

"The EU speaks with one voice in the climate negotiations. Sweden is part of the EU's delegation and has negotiated a common line together with other member countries. This gives a clear mandate to push for an ambitious outcome from COP28 that covers the breadth of global climate work - emission reductions, adaptation, and financing", the Swedish government states.

"On the agenda for the climate meeting is also climate financing, for example through aid funds, which is a central element in the implementation of the Paris Agreement. It should contribute to emission reductions and climate adaptation in developing countries, especially in vulnerable countries like the least developed countries and small island states. The donor countries recently confirmed that the goal of 100 billion USD per year in climate financing will be reached in 2023", the government further announces.

Oil mogul as climate chairman

That the UN climate meeting is held in the United Arab Emirates, a significant oil producer, has sparked a lot of criticism among climate activists and organizations. Many worry that 'fossil interests' will play an even larger role this year than during COP27 in Egypt, where the fossil industry had over 600 representatives present.

Furthermore, the chairman of the summit is Sultan Al Jaber – who is simultaneously the industry minister and the head of the country's state-owned oil company.

Al Jaber, who also has ties to the infamous globalist network World Economic Forum, has been accused on several occasions of attempting to 'greenwash' the United Arab Emirates and its oil industry and trying to present himself as an advocate of "climate-friendly" alternatives and "green energy" – while he is actually one of the fossil industry's most powerful players.

Members of his staff have also been tasked with censoring and removing negative information about Al Jaber on the encyclopedia Wikipedia, and instead editing the articles and using biased sources, to make the oil mogul appear as something of a climate hero.

Reduced meat consumption on the agenda

A major focus of the conference is expected to be on discussing how to persuade political leaders to encourage and influence citizens to consume less meat.

"The global food systems’ road map to 1.5C is expected to be published by the United Nations’ Food & Agriculture Organization during the COP28 summit next month. Nations that over-consume meat will be advised to limit their intake, while developing countries – where under-consumption of meat adds to a prevalent nutrition challenge – will need to improve their livestock farming, according to the FAO", Bloomberg reports.

It is particularly Europe and the USA that are urged to "dramatically reduce their meat consumption", American media report.

– The failure of leading meat and dairy companies to reduce emissions underlines the urgent need for more policy focus on the food and agriculture sector," Jeremy Coller, the chair and founder of the FAIRR Initiative, an investor network that works with financial institutions to promote climate-friendly agriculture worldwide, in a recent statement.

– Food system emissions deserve a place at the top of the table, alongside energy and transport, as they represent an estimated third of greenhouse gas emissions and 40% of methane, he continued.

Lab-grown meat will also be discussed in panel talks and seems to be promoted as something unequivocally positive.

"In this mini-panel discussion, we cut deep into cultured meats. Join industry leaders in the space as we discuss scalability, nutrition, affordability, environmental footprint and a host of other issues", it is written among other things.

Lobbyist influence

Another concern is how companies, think tanks, lobbyists, and industry organizations might use the climate meeting to influence decision-makers and the issues to be addressed. Adrienne Sörbom, a professor at SCORE (Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research), is on site to study just this.

– My interest is to understand how organizations such as think tanks, companies, private research institutes, and others try to influence negotiations at a COP event.

Together with colleagues, she wants to "illuminate the role" these actors play in shaping global climate policy.

'We know from previous research that these types of organizations that want to influence politics in the background are active in global political decision-making

– We believe that the same type of activities is also ongoing in terms of climate. We can see from previous participant lists that these organizations are there.

– We believe, based on previous research, that they will try to be what we call 'private diplomats'... This means that they will try to act as ambassadors for certain problems and solutions. They will also be there as private organizers of discreet meetings in the background, she continues.

Opportunity to sell oil

Furthermore, it is reported that the host country – the United Arab Emirates, has planned to use gatherings and meetings just before the official COP28 event to conduct gas and oil deals with representatives of foreign governments.

”More than 150 pages of prepared briefings for meetings held by Sultan Ahmed al Jaber, COP28 president, earlier this year, reportedly show conversations about opportunities to increase exports", writes Sky News, referring to the Centre for Climate Reporting.

The chairman Ahmed al Jaber, who is also the CEO of Abu Dhabi's national oil company Adnoc, is said to have planned to "discuss commercial interests with almost 30 countries ahead of the summit".

– The UN Climate Summit is supposed to be a space where the world holds polluters to account, but increasingly it's being hijacked by those with opposing interests, argues Teresa Anderson from the charity organization ActionAid.

BlackRock and Rothschild

Looking at COP28's advisory committee, some familiar names appear – including Larry Fink, CEO of perhaps the world's most powerful and infamous investment company, BlackRock, and Sir John Rose, vice chairman of the Rothschild Group.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink. Photo: World Economic Forum/Jolanda Flubacher

The Rockefeller Foundation, ahead of the summit, has announced its aim to become "emission-neutral" and that it has invested about 6 billion dollars in initiatives for reduced emissions.

"The Rockefeller Foundation aims to contribute to the global decarbonization effort, accelerating the work needed to meet the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement. Along with regular reporting of progress, The Rockefeller Foundation will also convene investors, peers, and experts to advance broader collaboration towards net zero, with the first event to take place in early 2024", the foundation writes.

Among the event's sponsors are also, among others, Bank of America and Dubai Islamic Bank. COP28 is scheduled between November 30 and December 12.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Orbán: Poland has become a vassal of Brussels

The globalist agenda

Published November 3, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Relations between Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk (left) and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán are becoming increasingly toxic.

Relations between Viktor Orbán in Hungary and Donald Tusk in Poland are deepening into an open conflict over both EU influence and the war in Ukraine. Orbán argues that the Tusk problem goes far beyond bilateral disagreements — it's about Poland being given the role of Brussels' vassal state.

The Hungarian Prime Minister claims that Poland under Tusk has taken a dramatic step toward losing national autonomy and has also become a "vassal of Brussels".

"He has become one of the loudest warmongers in Europe – yet his war policy is failing: Ukraine is running out of European money, and the Polish people are tired of the war. He cannot change course because he has turned Poland into a vassal of Brussels", Orbán writes in a post on X.

Beyond the war in Ukraine, questions about the EU's role are also central to the conflict. Orbán has previously accused Brussels of playing an active role in helping Donald Tusk's EU-friendly government come to power in Poland.

Donald Tusk has in turn criticized Orbán for viewing "Brussels, democracy and a transparent rule of law are a problem", an attack that has further escalated tensions between the countries.

Shift in Polish public opinion

According to an opinion poll from the IBRiS institute, currently only 33.5 percent of Poles support Ukraine's NATO membership. This represents a shift that leads Orbán to claim that Europe is waking up, and that Polish public support for Ukraine is declining.

Donald Tusk, however, has declared the war in Ukraine as "our war", referring to the fact that the future of Poland and Europe is at stake. Orbán responds that both Poland and the EU are playing a dangerous game with the lives of millions of Europeans.

Hungary's repeated blocking of military support to Ukraine and its application for EU and NATO membership has long been a thorn in the side of Poland and other EU member states.

Poland and Hungary previously belonged to the so-called Visegrád Group (V4) and often shared positions against Brussels. But as the war in Ukraine progressed and major strategic dividing lines emerged, the relationship has become strained.

While Tusk strives to gain increased influence for Poland within the EU and NATO, Orbán has made it clear that he wants to see a different kind of European order — where nation-states have greater freedom and Brussels' central power is questioned.

Harsh criticism of Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado

The globalist agenda

Published October 11, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Maria Corina Machado has previously participated in the globalist forum World Economic Forum.

American journalist Max Blumenthal sharply criticizes the Nobel Committee's decision to award the 2025 Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition politician Maria Corina Machado.

In a statement on social media, he accuses the laureate of being a US-funded regime change activist and argues that the prize is a green light for military action against Venezuela.

Max Blumenthal, a journalist at the US-based news website The Grayzone, has in a lengthy post on X questioned the Nobel Committee's decision to award the Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela's opposition.

Blumenthal describes Machado as a political actor working in US interests rather than for peace. "The Nobel Committee has decided to make the case for Trump's war on Venezuela, giving its 'Peace Prize' to Maria Corina Machado, a US govt-funded regime change activist who's helped lead failed military coups, violent street riots, and has likely promised her country's oil and mineral wealth to a consortium of MAGA aligned billionaires in exchange for financing her political arsonism," he writes.

Comparisons to Pinochet and Netanyahu

The journalist harshly attacks the laureate, calling her "a marionette for Marco Rubio, a creation of the CIA-sponsored Gusano Industrial Complex that has brought violent terror and siege to any Latin American country defying the Washington Consensus of privatization and austerity, and a would-be Pinochet in a skirt."

Blumenthal also claims that Machado has turned to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for support. "This icon of peace has even appealed to Benjamin Netanyahu to help her lead a military invasion of Venezuela," he writes.

Criticism for supporting sanctions

A central part of Blumenthal's criticism concerns Machado's alleged lobbying for economic sanctions against her own country. He argues that she "has spent years lobbying for US and EU starvation sanctions on her own country, resulting in waves of migration to the US, fueling the nativist resentment that gave rise to Trump."

Blumenthal also points to Machado's response when Donald Trump sent Venezuelan migrants to a detention camp in El Salvador earlier this year. "When Trump shipped Venezuelan migrants to a torture camp in El Salvador this year, Machado predictably sided with Trump, the main sponsor of her putschist career, over her countrymen," he writes.

Committee's role a "soft power instrument"

The journalist draws parallels to previous controversial awards and argues that the decision regarding Machado is consistent with the Committee's role as a power instrument for the Western world. "Giving the Nobel to Machado is a green light for regime change war on Venezuela, and then Cuba. But the decision is consistent with the Committee's role as a soft power instrument of the Western empire," he states.

He recalls the prize to Barack Obama at the beginning of his first presidential term: "Just recall its award to Obama at the beginning of his first term, granting him infinite legitimacy in advance of his destruction of Libya, escalation of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and facilitation of Gaza's decimation."

Blumenthal concludes with an interpretation of what he sees as the real purpose behind the award: "Given that nothing has happened in Machado's career without the support and guidance of Washington, the Committee's decision must be seen as the result of another Western op - a coup in Oslo to pave the way for one in Caracas."

Tony Blair could gain power over Gaza

The globalist agenda

Published October 1, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair at the World Economic Forum power conference in Davos, earlier this summer.

The notorious globalist and war hawk Tony Blair now wants to govern post-war Gaza for up to five years. According to WikiLeaks, the plan would give outside forces control over everything from laws to money flows.

Tony Blair, the architect behind Britain's participation in the Iraq War that cost hundreds of thousands of lives, now wants to lead an international transitional authority for Gaza after the war ends. According to people with insight into the Trump administration's peace plan, Blair could become chairman of a "Gaza International Transitional Authority".

The plan has been developed together with Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and is primarily financed by tech billionaire Larry Ellison. According to reports, Blair would lead a secretariat of 25 people that would administer Gaza for up to five years.

WikiLeaks comments on the development in sharp terms:

"A battle is brewing over who will run the wasteland. Into this vacuum steps Tony Blair, lined up to head a US-backed Gaza International Transitional Authority", the organization writes.

The organization describes the arrangement as something far more comprehensive than traditional post-war governance:

"This is not postwar governance in a conventional sense but a model of neo-trusteeship; external control over territory, law, and the flows of reconstruction, data, and capital".

WikiLeaks also points to the economic interests behind the plan and notes that Blair is backed by principal funder Larry Ellison and plans to lead the administration for up to five years.

Notorious war instigator

Tony Blair is one of modern times' most notorious British politicians. As Prime Minister from 1997-2007, he gave his full support to US invasions of both Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.

Blair was accused of misleading the British Parliament and population about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction – weapons that were never found and whose existence is now questioned. The Chilcot Inquiry in 2016 established that Blair had exaggerated the threat from Saddam Hussein and that the British government had acted on inadequate or falsified intelligence information.

His close relationship with George W. Bush and unconditional support for American foreign policy earned him the nickname "Bush's poodle" from critics. Over one million demonstrated in London against the Iraq War in February 2003, but Blair still pushed through British participation.

Long-standing Israel support

Blair has been an outspoken Israel supporter over the years. As peace envoy for the Quartet – the UN, US, EU and Russia – he was responsible from 2007-2015 for promoting the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.

During his time, however, illegal settlement construction in the West Bank continued and the Gaza blockade remained. Palestinian leaders and human rights organizations repeatedly accused him of favoring Israel and functioning as a partisan political actor instead of a neutral mediator.

During Israel's war in Gaza, which has so far killed over 65,000 Palestinians according to local health authorities, Blair has been working on his plan for international governance of the area. He met President Trump at the White House last month to present the proposal.

Resistance from the Arab world

European and Arab states have already expressed opposition to the idea of an international trusteeship for Gaza. They argue that such an arrangement would further marginalize Palestinians and lack legitimacy in the eyes of Gaza residents. Instead, they advocate that Gaza should be governed by a committee consisting of Palestinian technocrats with support from the Palestinian Authority, which currently administers parts of the West Bank.

Trump presented his Gaza plan to Arab leaders in New York this week. The proposal gives Palestinians limited administrative power, but real control would lie with an international board – potentially led by Tony Blair.

However, everything could collapse as early as Monday. That's when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets President Trump in Washington – and Netanyahu has already made his position clear: the Palestinian Authority will have no role in Gaza's future and Hamas must be completely eliminated.

Without Israeli approval, the plan cannot be implemented, which would stop both Trump's peace attempt and Blair's return to Middle East politics.

WEF founder manipulated reports to protect political relationships

The globalist agenda

Published July 25, 2025 – By Editorial staff
"We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019", Schwab is alleged to have said, manipulating the organization's prestigious "Global Competitiveness Report" for political reasons.

Klaus Schwab allegedly altered countries' rankings in important economic reports to avoid affecting relationships with India, and to prevent Brexit supporters from being able to use positive figures for the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, extensive expenses of 900,000 Swiss francs that his wife charged through WEF are being scrutinized.

World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab is accused of manipulating the organization's prestigious "Global Competitiveness Report" for political reasons. According to an ongoing investigation, he changed countries' rankings to protect diplomatic relationships and thereby prevent the results from being used politically, reports the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.

Changed to protect India relations

The serious incident occurred in 2017-2018 when a methodology change caused India to fall over 20 places in the ranking while the United Kingdom climbed from seventh to fourth place. Schwab then intervened directly and emailed those responsible with the justification: "We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019".

He did not want to risk Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi canceling his visit. At the same time, he wrote that the United Kingdom "must not see any improvement" because this would be "exploited by the Brexit camp".

Despite Schwab saying he supported the new methodology, he concluded: "This year we simply cannot implement this". Otherwise, the good relationships with India, which he had "invested so much in during the year", would be destroyed.

The report was eventually published, but with altered figures: India ended up in 40th place and the United Kingdom in eighth place – both only one place worse than in 2016.

Shared secret reports with governments

Even more serious is that Schwab in 2022 allegedly shared a secret draft of the report with a government representative from an Arab country whose ranking had deteriorated significantly. After receiving "critical feedback", Schwab recommended to management that the report not be published at all.

The 2021-2022 report was never published, and no new versions have appeared since then.

Wife's expenses without official role

In parallel, Schwab's wife Hilde is now being scrutinized, who without an official function at WEF has had her travels charged through the organization. Lawyers from the firm Homburger have discovered questionable expenses totaling 900,000 Swiss francs (€970,000) over the past ten years.

Hilde Schwab runs her own foundation for social entrepreneurship but has no formal role within WEF. Despite this, her travels, which cannot always be explained by her activities, have been paid for by WEF.

Denies the allegations

Schwab has tried to defend himself against the manipulation allegations:

To construct this as a manipulation is an insult to my academic standing, he has said.

He claims that he only forwarded corrections from governments to use updated data or correct errors in the analysis.

Investigation ongoing

The Nordic Times already reported in April that Klaus Schwab was forced to resign from WEF and that a comprehensive investigation is ongoing. The federal foundation authority is also reviewing the use of WEF's funds.

An important board meeting has been postponed, but time is running out. By the end of August at the latest, invitations to WEF 2026 must be sent out.

Schwab's spokesman, Jörg Denzler, refuses to comment on the investigation:

— The June agreement is of central significance for Mr. Schwab. In contrast to some other parties, Mr. Schwab fully complies with the terms and does not comment publicly when approached by the media.