Sunday, August 10, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Human rights organization: Civilians maimed by Ukraine’s banned mines

The war in Ukraine

Published 6 February 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Russian soldiers track Ukrainian mines in Mariupol.
3 minute read

Human rights watch (HRW) accuses Ukraine of using banned “butterfly mines” around the town of Izium. At least 50 people, including five children, are reported to have been seriously injured by the mines and at least 11 have died.

“Ukraine appears to have significantly dispersed anti-personnel mines in the Izium area in the northeast,” comments weapons expert Steve Goose in the HRW report, which points out that the mines are spread over large areas and pose a very real danger to civilians in Ukraine.

Ukraine has previously signed a UN convention committing it not to use anti-personnel mines.

However, this did not prevent Ukrainian forces from deploying thousands of butterfly mines in the area around Izium, against which they carried out a major offensive in the autumn. So far, this has resulted in at least 50 confirmed injuries to civilians, almost all of whom have had to have their arms or legs amputated. At least 11 civilians are reported to have been killed by the mines.

HRW says that Russia has also used the banned PFM-1 type of mines – but that this in no way excuses Ukraine’s use of them.

The mines are very light and are launched or dropped from the air and once landed function like a normal landmine that explodes when stepped on. According to HRW, they are also designed to cause severe injuries and tear off the victim’s legs or arms.

The mines resemble plastic children’s toys. Photo: Carl Montgomery/CC BY 2.0

The mines can by the color be mistaken for leaves or litter, and they resemble plastic toys, which means that children often pick them up and are injured or killed when they explode.

Witnesses spoken to by HRW say that the mines have been found at kindergartens, schools, hospitals and residential areas, among others. Many also testify that they or their friends and family members have been badly injured when they accidentally stepped on them. One 41-year-old woman tells of going out early one morning in August to use the outdoor pool:

– I didn’t have a torch because it was after curfew (at night) when I went to the toilet. Suddenly there was an explosion and I was without a leg,” the woman says, explaining that the explosion tore off her right leg.

The woman was helped by Russian troops to go to another town to perform the amputation and in the meantime her husband discovered more mines in their garden.

One man tells the report how in September he was walking home from a neighbour’s house when he suddenly heard an explosion in the sky and started running for cover as yet another explosion was heard.

– And at that moment I was on the ground on my back. I felt pain in my back and I looked at my leg and it looked like an open rose. I started screaming and people heard me… an ambulance came and took me to the hospital.

– The next thing I remember is that I was in the hospital at night without a foot,” he says.


Russian state-owned channel RT shows the mines in Donetsk.

 

Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry has commented on the report, pointing out that it has the right to self-defence against Russia – which it says is the perpetrator of war crimes and genocide. However, it promises to investigate the allegations of the use of banned mines thoroughly and that it intends to stand by its international obligations.

By 2021, according to the Ukrainian government, there will be 3.3 million anti-personnel mines in the country’s military stockpile.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

7 out of 10 Ukrainians want to negotiate for peace

The war in Ukraine

Published yesterday 11:38
– By Editorial Staff
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's tone toward Russia has changed markedly in recent times - a sign that peace may be near?
2 minute read

A clear shift in public opinion is evident in Ukraine after more than three years of war. In Gallup’s latest poll, conducted in early July, 69% of respondents say they want to end the war as soon as possible through peace negotiations.

Only 24% prefer to continue fighting until victory. This represents a complete reversal compared to 2022, when 73% wanted to continue fighting for victory and only 22% advocated for negotiations.

Despite the desire for negotiations, few Ukrainians believe the fighting will end soon. 25% consider it likely that active fighting will end within the next twelve months, but only 5% see this as “very likely”.

68% believe that an end to fighting within a year is unlikely. Meanwhile, daily missile and drone attacks continue, and fighting remains intense along several front sections.

Fewer and fewer Ukrainians believe in victory on the battlefield. Illustration: Gallup

“Support for the war effort has declined steadily across all segments of the Ukrainian population, regardless of region or demographic group. This shift comes as diplomatic efforts gain new traction. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has signaled readiness for direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, proposing renewed negotiations, while U.S. President Donald Trump is attempting to pressure the Kremlin with the threat of sanctions”, writes Gallup analyst Benedict Vigers, continuing:

“Despite these moves, the conflict continues largely unabated. Daily missile and drone attacks persist, and fighting remains intense along multiple sections of the front line”.

Fewer believe in NATO and EU

Ukrainians’ view of US political leadership has also shifted dramatically. In 2025, 16% say they are satisfied with US leadership, while 73% disapprove – the highest level to date. The strong sympathies that existed in 2022, when 66% approved of US leadership, have thus practically disappeared.

The Ukrainian people have a very negative view of current US leadership. Illustration: Gallup

Belief that Ukraine will join the US-led military alliance NATO has also fallen sharply. In 2022, 64% believed in membership within ten years; in 2023, the figure rose to 69%. Last year it had dropped to 51%, and in 2025 it stands at 32% – roughly half the level of three years earlier.

Meanwhile, the proportion who believe Ukraine will never become a NATO member has increased to 33%, which matches the proportion still expecting entry within a decade.

Regarding the EU, expectations are stronger, though dampened compared to earlier. A narrow majority, 52%, believe in EU membership within ten years in 2025, compared to 61% last year and 73% in both 2022 and 2023.

Gallup poll – July 2025

  • 69% want to end the war through negotiations
  • 24% want to continue fighting until victory
  • 25% believe the fighting will stop within a year (5% "very likely")
  • 68% believe the fighting will not stop within a year
  • 16% approve of US leadership, 73% disapprove
  • 32% believe in NATO membership within 10 years
  • 33% believe Ukraine will never become a NATO member
  • 52% believe in EU membership within 10 years

Nordic countries unite on new major aid package for Ukraine

The war in Ukraine

Published 6 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The support package will include ammunition for the Patriot air defense system, among other items.
2 minute read

Sweden, Norway and Denmark are joining forces in a new military aid package for Ukraine. Sweden is providing the largest portion of the assistance, which includes air defense systems, anti-tank weapons and ammunition.

In July, Donald Trump and NATO agreed on an aid package for Ukraine – an initiative where the US delivers advanced defense equipment to selected NATO countries, which in turn coordinate and finance further deliveries to Ukraine. So far, about ten NATO countries, including Sweden, have endorsed this arrangement.

Now Sweden, Norway and Denmark have decided to jointly contribute a military aid package totaling $500 million – Sweden’s share amounts to around $275 million.

We welcome the US decision to provide equipment to Ukraine, including ammunition for the Patriot air defense system, and that NATO is coordinating the support. Ukraine has a great need for support from allies and partners to defend itself against Russian aggression, says Swedish Defense Minister Pål Jonson (Moderate Party) at a press conference.

— Ukraine stands on the front line for our freedom and democracy. Blue-yellow solidarity is therefore the single most important thing right now. We stand by their side for as long as it takes, aid package after aid package – military and humanitarian. Together in NATO, together with Ukraine, we continue to defend freedom, claims Swedish Education and Integration Minister Simona Mohamsson (Liberal Party).

The aid package will include air defense systems, anti-tank weapons and ammunition that will be procured by the US and delivered to Ukraine. Sweden has previously contributed military support worth nearly €8 billion since the war in Ukraine began.

Greene: Ukraine support a betrayal of the American people

The war in Ukraine

Published 6 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Greene is highly critical of the neoconservative "war hawks" within the Republican Party - and their influence.
2 minute read

Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene directs harsh criticism at party colleagues and other politicians who continue to want to send American aid to Ukraine.

In a post on X, she describes the support as a “complete betrayal” of the American people – and argues that voters have already said no to financing foreign conflicts.

“Funding, fueling, and ultimately fighting Russia in Ukraine would be a complete betrayal to the majority of Americans”, she writes, referring to the recent presidential election where Trump defeated Joe Biden and returned to the White House.

According to Greene, one of the voters’ clearest signals was to put a stop to US involvement in foreign wars.

“America voted to end funding and fighting foreign wars”, the Republican adds.

Her statement came the day after a new bill was presented in the Senate, where $54.6 billion is proposed to be earmarked for Ukraine for budget years 2026 and 2027.

“Don’t want to pay to murder people”

Greene accuses politicians on both sides of the aisle of ignoring the message voters conveyed in the election. She argues that young Americans in particular feel betrayed:

“Republicans supporting such policies could lose the younger generation of voters and may never get them back”.

She argues that people under 50 increasingly feel unrepresented by both Republicans and Democrats, not least because of how tax money is used:

“Various taxpayer-funded initiatives have made life unaffordable and the future bleak for the vast majority of average American”, she continued.

In the same post, Greene criticizes the moral foundation for American Ukraine support:

“American taxpayers do not want to pay to murder people in some foreign land over a foreign conflict that has absolutely zero effect on our lives”.

Corrupt leadership?

She also supports the president’s line, where European countries are expected to bear greater responsibility for the war in Ukraine. Trump has since his return to the White House opposed continued economic support to Kyiv and has repeatedly questioned how the money is used and warned that billions from the Biden administration’s previous aid packages may have been embezzled.

Trump’s former advisor Steve Cortes has also expressed harsh criticism. He has called Ukraine “corrupt” and warned that its leadership “cannot be trusted,” referring to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy acting against independent anti-corruption bodies.

Greene has in previous statements called Zelensky a “dictator” and accused him of blocking all peace initiatives.

The Russian government has in turn repeatedly warned that the Western world’s military and economic support to Ukraine only prolongs the war and leads to more bloodshed. According to Moscow, every new aid package is an obstacle to peace negotiations.

Russia rules out talks between Putin and Zelensky without final agreement

The war in Ukraine

Published 25 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Moscow says no to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyj before a finished agreement is on the table.
2 minute read

Russia currently rules out a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, unless the parties first agree on the draft of a finished memorandum. This was stated by Vladimir Medinsky, the Kremlin’s lead negotiator in talks with Ukraine, in connection with the latest peace talks in Turkey.

Medinsky, one of the most prominent representatives of the Kremlin in the ongoing peace negotiations, emphasized that a personal meeting between the two leaders is only meaningful if they have already agreed on the terms of a peace agreement and are ready to sign it.

There’s no point in meeting only to begin negotiations from square one, he said, referring to previous summits that in practice prolonged the conflict rather than resolved it.

He also brought up historical cases where heads of state only met to sign already negotiated agreements, not to initiate new processes.

As an example, Medinsky mentioned the Chinese civil war in the 1940s:

Chiang Kai-shek constantly insisted on meeting in person to discuss everything. I believe they met five times, smiled, and posed for photographs, but it did not bring an end to the civil war. The core issues remained unresolved, and the war went on.

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed Medinsky’s line and stated that Russia considers such a meeting relevant only when a final agreement is in place.

The statements come at a time when the question of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky is once again being discussed internationally as a possible path to peace in Ukraine.

Parties far apart from each other

Many diplomats and international actors, not least in the West, have for a long time advocated direct talks between the two leaders to break the diplomatic deadlock in the conflict.

Volodymyr Zelenskyj has previously expressed a willingness to meet Putin to discuss peace, but has also set demands including the withdrawal of Russian forces and confirmation of Ukraine’s sovereignty as prerequisites.

Russia, for its part, has consistently demanded that the talks should be based on Russian security interests, including control over certain territories – something that the Ukrainian government rejects.

Medinsky’s and Peskov’s statements underscore that Russia does not see any immediate room for a summit as long as the fundamental prerequisites for peace are not already established, which makes the conditions for direct dialogue continue to be difficult.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.