Thursday, March 20, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

After the covid restrictions: more children in psychiatric emergency wards

The adverse effects of corona policy

Published 8 May 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Hospital admissions related to self-harm increased by 82% during the restrictions.

Emergency department visits and mental health admissions increased among children and young people during the restrictions in Australia, according to a new study. The researchers also point out that despite the removal of the restrictions, hospitalization rates for mental health problems are still higher than before the coronavirus crisis.

In a new Australian study, researchers at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) analyzed data from six major children’s hospitals in the country. They looked at more than 130,000 emergency department visits and inpatient admissions where children and young people sought help for mental health problems during the COVID-19 restrictions between March 2020 and December 2021. The researchers also looked at the same type of data between January and June 2022, after restrictions were eased in Australia.

The researchers found that under Australia’s tight restrictions, emergency department visits for mental health reasons increased by 15% for children and young people. Admissions related to mental health problems also increased by 8.9% during that time.

Looking more closely at admissions related to self-harm, they increased by 82% during the restrictions and 76% for eating disorders.

The researchers conclude that many aspects of COVID-19 and the restrictions may have affected young people’s mental health. These include uncertainty about the future, social distancing, financial stress, and even the suspension of school and normal routines.

Mental health issues are the leading health concern for children and adolescents in Australia, says Dr. Jahid Khan, author of the study.

According to Khan,“the study highlights the increasing numbers of children and adolescents presenting to hospitals in mental health crisis during and since the COVID-19 pandemic”.

After the restrictions were lifted, visits for children and adolescents seeking help for mental health problems decreased slightly, but the numbers still remained higher than they were before the coronavirus crisis and restrictions began.

The number of mental health-related hospital presentations remained high after the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions were eased. This may be a result of continued pandemic-related stresses and delaying seeking mental health care, says Dr. Khan.

The researchers conclude that the country needs more capacity in mental health care for children and adolescents, which they say should be a priority as long-term mental illness contributes to social, academic and developmental problems.

Numerous other studies have been conducted on the impact of corona restrictions on the mental health of children and young people. For example, a study in 2021 showed that the prevalence of depression and anxiety in children has doubled globally since the start of the lockdown and isolation policy in early 2020.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Ad:

Lockdowns may have had a negative impact on children’s vision

The adverse effects of corona policy

Published 1 October 2024
– By Editorial Staff

A meta-study, published in the British Journal of Ophthalmology, analyzed research involving over five million children and teenagers from 50 countries on six continents. The increase in myopia in children was “particularly notable” following the coronavirus crisis, according to the researchers.

According to the study, the prevalence of myopia in children increased by 36% between 1990 and 2023, and today one in three children worldwide is myopic. The highest rates are in Asia, where 85% of children in Japan and 73% in South Korea are affected. In China and Russia, the figures are over 40%. The lowest prevalence is in Paraguay and Uganda, at around 1%, while the UK, Ireland and the US are at around 15%.

According to the researchers, several factors may play a role. For example, myopia in children was more prevalent throughout East Asia, but genetics also play a role. In Singapore and Hong Kong, for example, children start their education at the age of two, which means they focus their eyes more on books and screens in their early years, straining their eye muscles which can lead to myopia, the research shows. Comparatively in Africa, where it starts at the age of six to eight, myopia is seven times less common than in Asia.

The increase was also “particularly notable” after the coronavirus crisis, the researchers say. This is because a large number of countries forced their citizens to stay indoors for longer periods, leading to children using screens much more than usual.

“Emerging evidence suggests a potential association between the pandemic and accelerated vision deterioration among young adults”, write researchers from Sun Yat-Sen University in China, among others.

The researchers warn that myopia in children is a growing global health problem that could affect millions more children by 2050.

Teenagers’ brains aged faster during lockdowns

The adverse effects of corona policy

Published 16 September 2024
– By Editorial Staff
The fact that girls were more affected than boys may be because social interaction is more important to them.

The research from the University of Washington is clear: lockdowns, interrupted extracurricular activities, and school closures have prematurely aged teenagers’ brains. Girls were significantly more affected than boys.

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, definitively demonstrated that the brain structure of 160 teenagers changed over time using magnetic resonance imaging. The participants were between the ages of nine and 19 when the study began. In 2020, the study was paused due to societal lockdowns and restrictions. The researchers shifted the focus of the study to investigate how the lockdowns affected the teenagers’ brains. In 2021, the study resumed.

By measuring the thickness of the cerebral cortex, the outer layer of tissue in the brain that controls higher functions such as reasoning and decision-making, the researchers definitively found that the brains of teenage boys aged 1.4 years prematurely aged after the lockdowns. The girls’ brain scans definitively showed an accelerated aging of 4.2 years.

The cortex thins as we age. Chronic stress also causes similar changes in the brain. However, the thinning was much greater than expected between the first scan and the follow-up in 2018 and 2021. The scans definitively showed that the thinning was widespread throughout the female brain, occurring in 30 regions across both cerebral hemispheres and all lobes. In the male brain, the thinning was limited to only two regions, both in the occipital lobe. This affected distance and depth perception, face recognition, and memory.

– All of the teens in general showed this accelerated aging, researcher Patricia Kuhl told NBC News.

Social interaction more important for girls

Girls’ brains were generally more affected because social interaction is more important for girls than for boys, Kuhl says. Boys congregate around sports and physical activity. Teenage girls rely on personal relationships for emotional support and increased self-identity. Kuhl is adamant that the coronavirus crisis was particularly damaging for young people. They were already at a point in their lives when they were experiencing intense changes in their emotional and behavioral development, making isolation even more detrimental to their health.

– The pandemic was dramatic and unexpected, of course, but dramatic and catastrophic in a way, not only for physical health, but mental health, she says.

It is clear from previous research that children’s mental health was negatively affected by lockdowns and restrictions during the coronavirus crisis. One study showed that the mental health of Norwegian adolescents deteriorated during the Norwegian restrictions. Another study demonstrated that children who experienced lockdowns during the coronavirus crisis experienced more social, emotional and behavioural difficulties.

Ex-health chief admits Malaysia knew of AstraZeneca vaccine risks but didn’t inform public

The adverse effects of corona policy

Published 6 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
The Malaysian authorities chose not to inform the public about the vaccine's side effects.

Malaysia’s health department knew about the side effects of Astra Zeneca’s covid vaccine, former general director Tan Sri Dr. Noor Hisham Abdullah has revealed. The decision not to inform the public was based on the fact that it was considered “important to weigh the small risks against the significant benefits”.

Since the distribution of AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine, several people have decided to sue the company for vaccine injuries. This includes a class action lawsuit in the United Kingdom, where more than 40 people have filed a lawsuit. Since its introduction, the pharmaceutical company has denied that its COVID-19 vaccine has any serious side effects, but admitted during court proceedings that it can cause thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which includes blood clots and low platelet levels. Soon after, the company decided to withdraw its Covid vaccine due to “reduced demand”.

The former director-general of Malaysia’s Department of Health, Tan Sri Dr. Noor Hisham Abdullah, was a panelist at the Mercy Malaysia International Humanitarian Conference. There he was asked about COVID-19 vaccines, specifically AstraZeneca’s.

– Before we started using the AstraZeneca vaccine, we reviewed the papers on its side effects. At that time, there was fear regarding the potential for serious side effects caused by the vaccine, he admits, according to the New Straits Times.

Although he describes the fear as “minimal,” he says there were concerns about these side effects, including cases of heart attacks.

– During clinical trials, although there was concern, we were facing 300 to 500 deaths daily from Covid-19, he says.

Not wanting to create “fear”

He also admits that even when they became aware of the side effects, they chose not to tell the public because it was “important to weigh the small risks against the significant benefits”.

– We knew (about the side effects), but the public did not, because of the fear, says the former general director.

In his defense, he also claims that “side effects were closely monitored and reported”, with most reported to be mild. A number of side effects were also noted that stood out and required the agency’s “attention,” but he would not go so far as to confirm that they were directly caused by the COVID-19 vaccine.

It is important to have solid evidence before attributing complications to the vaccine.

Lawyer: “We incentivized murdering patients in hospitals”

The adverse effects of corona policy

Published 5 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Tom Renz claims that the interests of those responsible were more about money than protecting patients.

During an Ohio State Senate hearing, attorney Tom Renz argued that the US covid-19 policy effectively providing financial incentives for US hospitals to let their patients die of covid-19 rather than make them better.

The hearing at the end of May concerned a bill (HB73) that would allow health care providers and pharmacies to give their patients drugs for diseases that the drug was not originally intended to cure – for example, Ivermectin, which is basically an anti-parasitic drug, but which was also used during the coronavirus crisis to treat covid-19 patients.

Renz is highly critical of the way the pharmaceutical industry and federal health authorities acted during the crisis, going so far as to claim that they gave hospitals “incentives” to let patients die – rather than actually cure them.

We incentivized MURDERING patients in hospitals. If you go to the hospital and you get a positive COVID test, then the hospital gets more money. If you get put on remdesivir, the hospital gets more money. If you get put on a vent, the hospital gets more money. Instead of saying, ‘You get more money when this patient’s healthy,’ we said, ‘You get more money when they die’, testified lawyer Tom Renz.

“It was about money”

According to Renz, hospitals received more money from the government for each patient who tested positive for covid-19. They also received additional money for treating covid-infected patients, and even more if the virus was listed as the cause of death – which, according to the lawyer, amounted to a form of encouragement to let patients die from the virus.

– What we did, we actually incentivized murdering patients in hospitals, he stated.

At the same time, Renz explained that there was a witch hunt against doctors who advocated or tested alternative treatments for covid-19, and that in many cases they were stripped of their licenses and permits to treat patients.

– We dealt with protecting doctors from nonsensical attacks on their licenses around the country by medical boards whose board members were parcitcing doctors and nurses who made tons of money off the existing covid protocols. What they did demonstrated that their interests were more about money than it was about protecting patients, in my opinion.

Share via

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.

Send this to a friend