Tuesday, May 13, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Swedish homeowners could face thousands in fees for municipal “climate action”

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published today 14:23
– By Editorial Staff
According to Romina Pourmokhtari, Minister for Climate and Environment, municipalities will not be able to charge land and property owners "any amount".

A new report suggests that Swedish property owners may be required to finance municipalities’ “climate adaptation measures”, with costs potentially reaching tens of thousands of EUR.

The proposal, which has been submitted to Climate and Environment Minister Romina Pourmokhtari (L), gives municipalities the right to, for example, build flood defenses to protect “matters of public interest” – and then charge property owners who are considered to benefit from the measure.

The investigator Johan Hjalmarsson himself points out that the term “public interest” is deliberately broad and vaguely worded.

– It could be buildings such as municipal buildings and schools, but it doesn’t have to be. There will need to be a municipal connection, but it doesn’t have to be a municipal facility, he told state television.

However, for the fee to apply, there must be a “significant risk” of damage from a specific natural event, and this risk must be eliminated by the measure. A property owner’s total fee may not exceed 10 percent of the market value of the property.

“Cannot charge whatever fees they want”

Liberal Climate and Environment Minister Romina Pourmokhtari claims that the proposal is about dealing with the direct consequences of the alleged climate crisis:

– In the same way that we have great respect and a strong desire to defend property rights in Sweden, with property rights come not only freedoms but also obligations. This is an example of the real consequences of climate change. Not in the future, but today, and that must be taken into account, she asserts.

She further promises that municipalities “cannot charge whatever fees they want”.

– Whether the government will implement this or not is something we cannot say today, she continues, describing the proposals as “interesting”.

Not all coastlines can be protected

The report also proposes that the state take responsibility for protecting certain coastlines from flooding through physical barriers, and Hjalmarsson admits that this will require prioritizing and choosing what to protect and which communities to leave exposed to the elements.

– But this is not something that will change overnight; the costs can be spread out over many years.

He argues that the need is urgent and that he has “met many municipalities that see the need for a decision from the state now”.

Maximum temperatures in nursing homes

The report also highlights the need to introduce maximum temperatures in premises for particularly vulnerable groups, such as the elderly.

– Heat waves are already a major problem for the elderly in our society. So I think it’s very important that these issues are brought to light and that we discuss what we can do, says Pourmokhtari.

For municipalities, this could mean a requirement to install air conditioning in nursing homes.

– If requirements are the way forward, this is something the government will need to look at. But action will be needed, and too little is being done today, adds the minister.

The investigator’s report will now be prepared by the Government Offices and sent out for consultation in accordance with standard procedures.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Swedish Green Party: Fuel prices to rise sharply if we win 2026 election

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 11 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Amanda Lind, Green Party, promises higher fuel prices in case of an election win next year.

The Swedish Green Party wants to see higher prices for petrol and diesel if it wins next year’s election and is counting on support from other red-green parties. The party is proposing a significantly higher reduction target and a new emissions trading system.

According to spokesperson Amanda Lind, Sweden risks missing several climate targets with its current policy and believes that a faster transition requires fossil fuels to become more expensive.

Amanda Lind emphasized in the tax-funded SVT program “30 minuter” that the party wants to raise the reduction obligation so that the price of gasoline and diesel initially rises by two to three kronor per liter, and then gradually more until 2030.

It will be more expensive for us to manage the climate transition, Lind said.

Broad consensus

The Green Party wants to phase out the reduction obligation in the long term and instead introduce a national emissions trading system, where companies must purchase emission allowances from the state. Until this system is in place, the party wants the reduction obligation to be increased, which will directly affect the price at the pump.

Amanda Lind believes that the entire opposition supports this approach and that there is broad agreement that traditional fuels must cost more.

The Kristersson government has previously lowered the reduction obligation and thus fuel prices, which the Green Party believes has slowed down electrification and climate work. To mitigate the impact on households with long distances to travel, the party wants to introduce targeted support and at the same time invest in public transport and electric cars.

Overall, the Green Party’s proposal means that fuel prices will increase gradually over the coming years if the red-green coalition wins the 2026 election.

Sweden Democrats leader dismisses climate alarmism: “No reason to panic”

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 7 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Jimmie Åkesson wants the focus to be on long-term and sustainable initiatives - not quick panic solutions.

Unlike most other Swedish establishment politicians, Sweden Democrats leader Jimmie Åkesson is highly skeptical of the climate alarmist rhetoric that dominates and wants the EU to slow down its climate initiatives.

Åkesson does not believe that the “climate threat” is in reality as serious as it is often portrayed by politicians and the media, nor does he buy the argument that we must hurry up and do everything we can before it is too late.

– I don’t share the view that there is such a hurry, he tells the tabloid Aftonbladet. Instead, he wants to put more resources into military rearmament.

– I am absolutely no expert, but everyone I talk to who has really familiarized themselves with what the IPCC’s various reports and scenarios say, there is no reason whatsoever to panic or climate anxiety, or anything like that at all.

Instead of quick and ill-considered measures that can have very negative consequences for society at large, the leader of the Sweden Democrats argues that we should invest in a long-term transition and electrification.

As expected, Åkesson’s departure from the established narrative on the climate issue has not gone down well with everyone.

Climate professor: “Very urgent”

Markku Rummukainen is a professor of climatology at Lund University and until 2023 represented Sweden on the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) a body tasked with compiling and presenting research on alleged climate change, global warming and its consequences.

The climate professor raged against Åkesson’s move, firmly stating that his views contradict the IPCC reports and unlike the SD leader, Rummukainen emphasized that it is “very urgent” to stop climate change.

– Yes, it is. There are, of course, different options for the way forward depending on what we do. There are opportunities to limit climate change between 1.5 and 2 degrees. If we don’t take the climate issue seriously, we will end up with higher numbers.

– According to the IPCC, all emissions matter. We are already seeing, and being affected by, the impacts of climate change. These include rising temperatures, rising sea levels and more extreme events such as more intense heatwaves and heavier rainfall. The effects are increasing rapidly with emissions, he continues.

“Following Putin’s lead”

Green Party spokesperson Daniel Helldén is also outraged by Jimmie Åkesson’s comments and says he has “got the whole climate issue backwards“.

Helldén also makes repeated attempts to link the SD leader with Russia and Vladimir Putin because Russian gas and oil exports are said to benefit if the EU does not invest heavily in “green” energy.

– It would strengthen the states that we are now trying to arm ourselves against. The policy he is pursuing is really following Putin’s lead. He must be cheering what he is saying.

– Russia’s huge exports of gas and oil are higher than the aid Europe gives to Ukraine. If the EU were to put the brakes on climate action, Russia could continue exporting. It will be Putin who wins from it, he repeats.

Swedish researchers to breed cows that burp less

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 29 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The aim is to reduce methane emissions from cows by 25% in as many years.

In a new project, researchers want to find a way to breed cows that emit less methane gas. The ultimate goal is to reduce total emissions by 25% in 25 years.

In the ongoing project, carried out by geneticists and researchers at Växa Sverige with support from SLU, the plan is to measure emissions from 100,000 cows and sheep in Sweden. The project, called the Global Metagenetics Initiative, is led internationally by Wageningen University.

It will also involve DNA testing of different cows to find out which type of cow burps the least.

This knowledge will allow us to carry out a so-called genomic breeding evaluation. This means that we select and breed the cows that have many predispositions for low methane gas emissions, says Tomas Klingström at SLU, to the tax-funded SVT.

According to researchers, there can be a big difference in belching between different ruminants, with some cows emitting 30 percent less methane gas than others.

– The goal is to reduce methane emissions from cows by 25% in 25 years.

British scientists start outdoor geoengineering experiments

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 27 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The UK government supports research and experiments on blocking the sun.

According to reports, British researchers are planning small-scale outdoor experiments with the controversial technology of geoengineering as part of a new government research program worth over £50 million. Critics warn of the risks and want to see a temporary halt to the plans.

The program, led by the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria), aims to investigate techniques for blocking sunlight and thus slowing down alleged climate change, according to reports in The Guardian, among others.

The technology, which involves spraying reflective particles into the atmosphere or enhancing cloud formation with seawater spray, is intended, according to its proponents, to temporarily lower the Earth’s surface temperatures.

Professor Mark Symes, program manager at Aria, says there is considerable interest in cooling the Earth.

– The uncomfortable truth is that our current warming trajectory makes a number of such tipping points distinctly possible over the next century. This has driven increased interest in approaches that might actively cool the world in a short timeframe in order to avoid those tipping points, says Mark Symes.

Proponents of geoengineering argue that the technology could act as an emergency brake if climate change threatens to reach what are considered irreversible levels.

Aria emphasizes that the experiments will be carefully controlled and designed to provide the necessary data on the possibilities and risks.

Critics, however, warn that the initiative, which is supported by Bill Gates, among others, could divert attention from the alleged need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

Dangerous distraction

Senior scientists have called the project a dangerous distraction, comparing the technology to treating cancer with aspirin.

However, Aria insists that the trials do not release any toxic substances and promises to consult with the local community and carry out environmental impact assessments before each test.

In parallel with Aria’s program, the UK’s National Environment Research Council (NERC) has launched a £10 million project to analyze the effects of geoengineering, but without conducting new field experiments.

Dr. Sebastian Eastham at Imperial College London, one of the researchers involved in the NERC project, emphasizes the importance of international cooperation.

We know that SRM, or even the prospect of SRM, would affect international relations – this is a serious research question.

Geoengineering remains a controversial field of research. There is currently no global agreement on regulation, and critical experts are calling for a moratorium on large-scale interventions in the Earth’s atmosphere.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.