Jacob Wallenberg calls for increased Swedish EU involvement

The globalist agenda

Published May 29, 2024 – By Editorial staff
Jacob Wallenberg calls for "new free trade agreements" and for Sweden to consider adopting the euro.

The Chairman of Investors and the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, Jacob Wallenberg, is now calling on Sweden to deepen its commitment to EU cooperation to strengthen the single market and promote free trade.

The Swedish oligarch also stresses "the need for a new discussion on the euro" and opposes increased demands for shorter working hours for Swedish workers.

Speaking at the annual general meeting of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise last week, Jacob Wallenberg stressed the importance of Sweden's role in the EU and the "challenges" facing businesses in an "increasingly uncertain world". He pointed out that more than 60% of Sweden's exports go to the EU single market, creating nearly 850,000 Swedish jobs.

– I believe that Sweden needs to engage even more with the EU, that Swedish companies need to make their voice heard both at home and in Brussels - a voice for free trade, for strengthening the single market.

He also suggested that Sweden should consider adopting the euro in order to fully participate in EU cooperation.

– We need to take up the discussion on whether Sweden should participate fully in the euro and thus in EU cooperation. This is not least about being involved in the decision-making process and not sitting outside in the waiting room.

Concerns about EU competitiveness

Wallenberg welcomes the fact that former Italian prime ministers Enrico Letta and Mario Draghi have been asked by the European Commission to make proposals on how to develop the single market and strengthen the EU's competitiveness.

– I think it is extremely important that this work is done, but it is also urgent that we listen and take on board what they say and that the EU has the capacity to take it forward.

He expressed concern that the EU is losing competitiveness to both China and the US.

– If we compare the US with the EU, 15 years ago the US and the EU had the same GDP. Today the US is 25% bigger. Obviously we have big challenges, he argued.

Wallenberg also pointed out that Sweden is at the bottom of the EU league when it comes to growth and that this is not sustainable.

– We need to start talking more about growth and how we create strong companies, he said, stressing that faster growth "would put Sweden in a better position to manage the climate transition and strengthen prosperity".

Advice on shorter working hours

A hot potato for some parties and for a couple of decades, which has been brought back to life in the run-up to the upcoming European Parliament elections on June 9, is the issue of reduced working hours.

The Left Party recently put the issue back on the agenda in connection with the launch of the party's election campaign.

In an interview with the tax-funded Swedish Radio Ekot last week, Jacob Wallenberg, not surprisingly, emphasized the employers' organization's line that the controversial issue of reduced working hours would be expensive for Sweden to implement.

– If we reduce working hours, it will be at the expense of our competitiveness and the country's economic development, said Jacob Wallenberg in what can partly be seen as a response to the Left Party's new demands.

New free trade agreements

Wallenberg is also concerned about the slow rollout of 5G in Sweden and calls for increased investment in research and development, a better functioning capital market and a reduced regulatory burden for companies.

– We also need new free trade agreements that give Swedish and European companies access to larger markets around the world as a counterweight to a world with protectionist tendencies, he says.

Jan-Olof Jacke, CEO of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, agrees with Wallenberg and stresses the need for a growth agenda for Sweden and Europe.

He points out that one of the reasons why the EU has lost ground in terms of GDP compared to the US is the number of hours worked.

– Fifty years ago we had the same annual working hours in Europe as in the US. Today, working hours in the US are about 15% higher than in Europe, which is an important factor in why GDP growth has been much stronger in the US, says Jacke.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

EU wants to increase Sweden’s membership fee by 60 percent

The globalist agenda

Published yesterday 12:00 pm – By Editorial staff

The European Commission's budget proposal threatens to make Sweden's EU membership fee 60 percent more expensive. Swedish EU Minister Jessica Rosencrantz (M) calls the proposal "unrealistic".

The Commission's seven-year budget plan for 2028–2034 amounts to nearly €2,000 billion. Sweden's current fee is approximately €4 billion per year.

During Tuesday's ministerial meeting in Brussels, Jessica Rosencrantz, representing Sweden's center-right Moderate Party, distanced herself from the plans.

For Sweden, this means at least a 60 percent increase in fees. That is not realistic and many other countries face similar challenges, she told Swedish public radio.

Sweden, together with Austria, gathered several net contributors for breakfast before the meeting – countries that pay more into the EU budget than they receive back in support. Rosencrantz notes there is shared concern about how large the increases could be.

But unity was not complete. French Minister Benjamin Haddad made clear that Paris wants a larger budget, not least to secure agricultural subsidies.

The EU needs more own resources, Haddad stated.

He was referring to a system where money goes directly to Brussels without passing through national parliaments – something Sweden rejects.

The budget issue will be discussed at the summit in December, but a final decision is not expected until 2027.

Orbán: Poland has become a vassal of Brussels

The globalist agenda

Published November 3, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Relations between Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk (left) and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán are becoming increasingly toxic.

Relations between Viktor Orbán in Hungary and Donald Tusk in Poland are deepening into an open conflict over both EU influence and the war in Ukraine. Orbán argues that the Tusk problem goes far beyond bilateral disagreements — it's about Poland being given the role of Brussels' vassal state.

The Hungarian Prime Minister claims that Poland under Tusk has taken a dramatic step toward losing national autonomy and has also become a "vassal of Brussels".

"He has become one of the loudest warmongers in Europe – yet his war policy is failing: Ukraine is running out of European money, and the Polish people are tired of the war. He cannot change course because he has turned Poland into a vassal of Brussels", Orbán writes in a post on X.

Beyond the war in Ukraine, questions about the EU's role are also central to the conflict. Orbán has previously accused Brussels of playing an active role in helping Donald Tusk's EU-friendly government come to power in Poland.

Donald Tusk has in turn criticized Orbán for viewing "Brussels, democracy and a transparent rule of law are a problem", an attack that has further escalated tensions between the countries.

Shift in Polish public opinion

According to an opinion poll from the IBRiS institute, currently only 33.5 percent of Poles support Ukraine's NATO membership. This represents a shift that leads Orbán to claim that Europe is waking up, and that Polish public support for Ukraine is declining.

Donald Tusk, however, has declared the war in Ukraine as "our war", referring to the fact that the future of Poland and Europe is at stake. Orbán responds that both Poland and the EU are playing a dangerous game with the lives of millions of Europeans.

Hungary's repeated blocking of military support to Ukraine and its application for EU and NATO membership has long been a thorn in the side of Poland and other EU member states.

Poland and Hungary previously belonged to the so-called Visegrád Group (V4) and often shared positions against Brussels. But as the war in Ukraine progressed and major strategic dividing lines emerged, the relationship has become strained.

While Tusk strives to gain increased influence for Poland within the EU and NATO, Orbán has made it clear that he wants to see a different kind of European order — where nation-states have greater freedom and Brussels' central power is questioned.

Harsh criticism of Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado

The globalist agenda

Published October 11, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Maria Corina Machado has previously participated in the globalist forum World Economic Forum.

American journalist Max Blumenthal sharply criticizes the Nobel Committee's decision to award the 2025 Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition politician Maria Corina Machado.

In a statement on social media, he accuses the laureate of being a US-funded regime change activist and argues that the prize is a green light for military action against Venezuela.

Max Blumenthal, a journalist at the US-based news website The Grayzone, has in a lengthy post on X questioned the Nobel Committee's decision to award the Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela's opposition.

Blumenthal describes Machado as a political actor working in US interests rather than for peace. "The Nobel Committee has decided to make the case for Trump's war on Venezuela, giving its 'Peace Prize' to Maria Corina Machado, a US govt-funded regime change activist who's helped lead failed military coups, violent street riots, and has likely promised her country's oil and mineral wealth to a consortium of MAGA aligned billionaires in exchange for financing her political arsonism," he writes.

Comparisons to Pinochet and Netanyahu

The journalist harshly attacks the laureate, calling her "a marionette for Marco Rubio, a creation of the CIA-sponsored Gusano Industrial Complex that has brought violent terror and siege to any Latin American country defying the Washington Consensus of privatization and austerity, and a would-be Pinochet in a skirt."

Blumenthal also claims that Machado has turned to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for support. "This icon of peace has even appealed to Benjamin Netanyahu to help her lead a military invasion of Venezuela," he writes.

Criticism for supporting sanctions

A central part of Blumenthal's criticism concerns Machado's alleged lobbying for economic sanctions against her own country. He argues that she "has spent years lobbying for US and EU starvation sanctions on her own country, resulting in waves of migration to the US, fueling the nativist resentment that gave rise to Trump."

Blumenthal also points to Machado's response when Donald Trump sent Venezuelan migrants to a detention camp in El Salvador earlier this year. "When Trump shipped Venezuelan migrants to a torture camp in El Salvador this year, Machado predictably sided with Trump, the main sponsor of her putschist career, over her countrymen," he writes.

Committee's role a "soft power instrument"

The journalist draws parallels to previous controversial awards and argues that the decision regarding Machado is consistent with the Committee's role as a power instrument for the Western world. "Giving the Nobel to Machado is a green light for regime change war on Venezuela, and then Cuba. But the decision is consistent with the Committee's role as a soft power instrument of the Western empire," he states.

He recalls the prize to Barack Obama at the beginning of his first presidential term: "Just recall its award to Obama at the beginning of his first term, granting him infinite legitimacy in advance of his destruction of Libya, escalation of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and facilitation of Gaza's decimation."

Blumenthal concludes with an interpretation of what he sees as the real purpose behind the award: "Given that nothing has happened in Machado's career without the support and guidance of Washington, the Committee's decision must be seen as the result of another Western op - a coup in Oslo to pave the way for one in Caracas."

Tony Blair could gain power over Gaza

The globalist agenda

Published October 1, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair at the World Economic Forum power conference in Davos, earlier this summer.

The notorious globalist and war hawk Tony Blair now wants to govern post-war Gaza for up to five years. According to WikiLeaks, the plan would give outside forces control over everything from laws to money flows.

Tony Blair, the architect behind Britain's participation in the Iraq War that cost hundreds of thousands of lives, now wants to lead an international transitional authority for Gaza after the war ends. According to people with insight into the Trump administration's peace plan, Blair could become chairman of a "Gaza International Transitional Authority".

The plan has been developed together with Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and is primarily financed by tech billionaire Larry Ellison. According to reports, Blair would lead a secretariat of 25 people that would administer Gaza for up to five years.

WikiLeaks comments on the development in sharp terms:

"A battle is brewing over who will run the wasteland. Into this vacuum steps Tony Blair, lined up to head a US-backed Gaza International Transitional Authority", the organization writes.

The organization describes the arrangement as something far more comprehensive than traditional post-war governance:

"This is not postwar governance in a conventional sense but a model of neo-trusteeship; external control over territory, law, and the flows of reconstruction, data, and capital".

WikiLeaks also points to the economic interests behind the plan and notes that Blair is backed by principal funder Larry Ellison and plans to lead the administration for up to five years.

Notorious war instigator

Tony Blair is one of modern times' most notorious British politicians. As Prime Minister from 1997-2007, he gave his full support to US invasions of both Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.

Blair was accused of misleading the British Parliament and population about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction – weapons that were never found and whose existence is now questioned. The Chilcot Inquiry in 2016 established that Blair had exaggerated the threat from Saddam Hussein and that the British government had acted on inadequate or falsified intelligence information.

His close relationship with George W. Bush and unconditional support for American foreign policy earned him the nickname "Bush's poodle" from critics. Over one million demonstrated in London against the Iraq War in February 2003, but Blair still pushed through British participation.

Long-standing Israel support

Blair has been an outspoken Israel supporter over the years. As peace envoy for the Quartet – the UN, US, EU and Russia – he was responsible from 2007-2015 for promoting the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.

During his time, however, illegal settlement construction in the West Bank continued and the Gaza blockade remained. Palestinian leaders and human rights organizations repeatedly accused him of favoring Israel and functioning as a partisan political actor instead of a neutral mediator.

During Israel's war in Gaza, which has so far killed over 65,000 Palestinians according to local health authorities, Blair has been working on his plan for international governance of the area. He met President Trump at the White House last month to present the proposal.

Resistance from the Arab world

European and Arab states have already expressed opposition to the idea of an international trusteeship for Gaza. They argue that such an arrangement would further marginalize Palestinians and lack legitimacy in the eyes of Gaza residents. Instead, they advocate that Gaza should be governed by a committee consisting of Palestinian technocrats with support from the Palestinian Authority, which currently administers parts of the West Bank.

Trump presented his Gaza plan to Arab leaders in New York this week. The proposal gives Palestinians limited administrative power, but real control would lie with an international board – potentially led by Tony Blair.

However, everything could collapse as early as Monday. That's when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets President Trump in Washington – and Netanyahu has already made his position clear: the Palestinian Authority will have no role in Gaza's future and Hamas must be completely eliminated.

Without Israeli approval, the plan cannot be implemented, which would stop both Trump's peace attempt and Blair's return to Middle East politics.