Friday, May 30, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

MIT researcher: “The mRNA vaccine can lead to infertility and fatal diseases”

The criticized covid vaccinations

The high-profile researcher Stephanie Seneff at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology believes that the mass vaccination campaign of the population with mRNA vaccines seems to lead to a drastic increase in serious chronic diseases and can also cause infertility - in addition to the alarming incidences of deaths now related to the controversial injections.

Published 25 June 2022
– By Editorial Staff
Stephanie Seneff, researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States.

It is in an interview with French FranceSoir that Stephanie Seneff announces her analysis of the mRNA vaccines, and it has been published in a scientific article entitled “Worse than the disease”, which deals with the experimental mRNA vaccines that are currently being injected on a wide front.

What we found was scary to me, says the MIT researcher.

Seneff does not mince her words and says that we will see a “shock increase” of nerve diseases, autoimmune diseases and cancer cases in the near future.

Young people will get these diseases. Younger and younger and more and more. They will not know why, we will not connect it. These injections are extremely dangerous and that is because they cause your cells to produce spike protein without control, Seneff states. It is the spike protein that the vaccine produces that evidently is the very cause of health damage to those who take the injection, she further emphasises.

This is the actual danger as the antibodies can turn into auto-antibodies and attack all possible forms of tissue and cause various autoimmune diseases, she explains.

Stephanie Seneff was one of the researchers who pointed out leaked information about how spike proteins from Pfizer’s corona vaccine during animal experiments got into the bloodstream and into the animals’ various organs.

In practice, we poison all people who receive this injection with spike protein.

Another alarming problem, Seneff emphasises, is that the spike protein is a prion-like protein. She therefore fears that its properties may lead to vaccinated people suffering from a number of serious diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease where the nervous system breaks down and the deadly disease Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease where the brain degenerates – a disease that has manifested itself in the animal kingdom in the mad cow disease and in humans has been known to affect mainly cannibal strains.

Due to the massive production of spike protein, I think we will see protein that enters the circulation and goes up into the brain and triggers a process that in the long run leads to a serious neuro-degenerative disease, says Seneff.

 

Paradoxically, Seneff points out that the vaccine can also lead to an increase in the infectivity of the coronavirus due to non-neutralised antibodies, which can lead to severe respiratory diseases and people becoming sicker than if they had not been vaccinated at all.

They knew that this risk existed but did not care, she states and points to virus outbreaks in the US where about 80 percent of the patients had been “fully vaccinated” against covid-19, that is, they had taken two injections of covid vaccine.

She also points out that the vaccine causes the body to produce large amounts of powerful antibodies which then bind to the spike protein of the virus or the vaccine – but do not necessarily protect the body. In people with a weak immune system, on the contrary, the antibodies can make it easier for viruses to enter weakened cells and thus cause the virus to duplicate and spread to a greater extent.

I think that within a couple of months we will be in a situation where vaccinated people are at a disadvantage compared to unvaccinated people, Seneff predicts.

She also notes that very unusual viruses such as the varicella zoster virus, which can cause severe facial paralysis, now seem to become more and more common as a result of actively modifying and weakening the body’s natural immune system.

In practice, we poison all people who receive this injection with spike protein

No one knows how long the spike protein actually stays in the body, according to Seneff, but she believes that it could potentially be a permanent effect and is also worried about a scenario where the RNA is converted to DNA and becomes one with the DNA plasma.

I think it can occur in cancer cells, in immune cells and in sperm, she explains and also says that studies have shown that sperm can convert foreign RNA to DNA and then transfer this to the woman’s eggs and thus also affect the fetus.

When a human is injected with the mRNA vaccine, the immune cells pass the RNA further into the lymphatic system to try to make antibodies. This allows them to “travel” on to the spleen, fallopian tubes and liver and she warns that the “overproduction” of antibodies created can and will lead to an increase in autoimmune diseases in people who have been vaccinated.

That it enters the fallopian tubes is very worrying, she states and believes that it is likely that the vaccine affects fertility and reproductive ability in this way and others – something that also a significant number of reports of miscarriages in vaccinated people indicate.

I can not understand how someone who is pregnant can agree to take that vaccine, but the government encourages women to do it … In the fallopian tubes, it will create this spike protein which is very toxic. You quickly realise that this cannot be good for reproductive ability, Seneff continues.

She also believes that the mRNA vaccines will lead to more cases of Parkinson’s disease and points out that there are already reports of previously fully healthy people who have been vaccinated and then developed the severe neurological disease in just a few weeks or months.

It is not only the general public that is being targeted for to quench criticism of the vaccination campaign, but also academic voices that are critical of the vaccine are systematically silenced. Seneff notes that it is very difficult to reach out with perspectives that deviate from the established line – that the vaccination campaign is justified and safe.

The main stream of those in power, she states, is apparently not interested in other perspectives but instead does everything in its power to ensure that the campaign is run, despite its potentially very serious consequences that can already be discerned.

They claim that we provide disinformation, but when you look in the virus database, there have already been more deaths linked to these vaccines in the first six months than there have been with all other vaccines in the last 20 years.

It is a crime to inject these poisons into young people

The given way forward, Seneff believes, would instead be to strengthen the immune system in a natural way. Among other things, she advises eating better and as organic as possible, making sure you get sunlight and ensuring that you get all the essential minerals.

These are simple things that people can do and that would significantly increase their chances of surviving covid-19, but the government says nothing about it. Instead, they fight people who use natural nutrients like zinc to prevent the disease.

Seneff testifies that she has many academic colleagues who share her views on the vaccine and on corona politics and that many are both surprised and despairing at how those in power have chosen to act.

– We do not understand how this can happen and why our country would actively want to harm its population, she says and further hopes that enough people will be critical of the mass vaccinations and the corona policy to stop it.

The researcher has drawn attention to, among other things, complications in vaccinated young people, where several reports of cardiac arrest have occurred in connection with the injections.

It is a crime to inject these poisons into young people and I am worried that they will lower the age limit to zero or six months.

The enormous resources and the political power that has been put into getting the public to accept the mRNA vaccine are unparalleled in history, Seneff states. She is convinced that it will ultimately hit back very hard against those who pushed the campaign. For the time being, she explicitly warns the public to take the vaccine – especially if you do not belong to any risk group.

I would like to show them (the politicians) why it is not a good idea to inject this toxic mixture into the muscles of American citizens. Personally, I would never be willing to take these injections under any circumstances, Seneff states.

Stephanie Seneff is a leading researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and has been associated with the prestigious university for over five decades. She has a bachelor's degree in biophysics, a master's degree in electrical engineering and a doctorate in computer science.

In her professional career, she has mainly researched the interaction between humans and computers and also algorithms as well as artificial intelligence to understand language and speech recognition.

For the past 13 years, Seneff has also focused a lot on how nutrition and environmental toxins affect diseases in humans, and in particular looked at the controversial pesticide glyphosate and the mineral sulfur.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

US removes COVID vaccine recommendation for children and pregnant women

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 28 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Kennedy has long been highly critical of the way the Biden administration urged that even young children be injected with the experimental vaccines.

The US government has removed the experimental COVID-19 vaccines from the list of recommended vaccinations for healthy pregnant women and children.

We’re now one step closer to realizing President Trump’s promise to make America healthy again, declared Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. when announcing the decision.

– I couldn’t be more pleased to announce that as of today the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule, RFK said in a video posted on X yesterday.

According to analysts, the decision will most likely mean that significantly fewer children and pregnant women will be vaccinated with the heavily criticized vaccines in the future – partly because this is not recommended by the authorities – but also because many insurance companies will likely no longer cover the cost.

– Last year the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children, Kennedy continued.

“Common sense and good science”

At the announcement, Kennedy was flanked by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Martin Makary and National Health Service Chief Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

– It’s common sense and it’s good science, Bhattacharya said.

– There’s no evidence healthy kids need it today and most countries have stopped recommending it for children, Makary added.

Even the US Department of Health and Human Services press secretary, Vianca N. Rodriguez Feliciano, states that “HHS and the CDC remain committed to gold standard science and to ensuring the health and well-being of all Americans – especially our nation’s children”.

“A victory for all children and pregnant women”

Since the vaccines became available, the government has recommended them to almost all citizens including children and pregnant women.

Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense (CHD) which early on urged the CDC not to recommend the vaccine for children and challenged the agency after the decision welcomes the announcement.

– Hallelujah! Holland said, adding: “These dangerous, poorly tested shots have caused injuries and death to far too many children. And many of the vaccines’ long-term side effects remain unknown. This is a major step in the right direction”.

– CHD urged the CDC not to add these dangerous vaccines to the childhood schedule. When we were ignored, we fought relentlessly to get them removed. This is a victory for all children and pregnant women.

In 2022, CHD sued the US federal Food and Drug Administration for granting emergency approval of COVID-19 vaccines for children and infants. The lawsuit alleged that the FDA abused its emergency use authorization power to push dangerous biological substances on minors. The organization appealed all the way to the US Supreme Court, which ultimately declined to hear the case.

“Emergency use authorized” for 5-year-olds

Even during the most panicked phases of the coronavirus crisis, experts agreed that children were at extremely low risk from COVID-19. Shortly after the vaccines were approved, side effects were reported, and peer-reviewed studies linked the vaccine to myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in young people, in addition to several other health risks.

Despite this, public health authorities initially approved the vaccine for people aged 16 and older, and extended it to 12-year-olds in May 2021. The FDA then approved the vaccine for children aged 5 and older in October 2021, and for infants aged 6 months in June 2022.

However, the COVID-19 vaccine has never received full approval from the FDA for children under 12 it is still only authorized for use under emergency use authorization.

Nevertheless, the CDC added COVID vaccination to its routine vaccination schedule for children and adults in February 2023, after the agency’s advisory committee unanimously recommended it. The CDC has since continued to recommend annual booster doses for children.

The federal vaccination schedule also forms the basis for the vaccination recommendations given by most doctors, and also serves as formal guidance for state and local public health authorities that determine which vaccinations are required for school attendance. Children must usually have received all vaccines on the schedule to be considered “up to date”.

EU’s withholding of Pfizer vaccine texts ruled illegal by court

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 15 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla had secret text message conversations in 2021.

The European Commission is found guilty by the European Court of Justice of withholding text messages between Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer’s CEO in connection with the multi-billion euro purchase of COVID-19 vaccines. The Court ruled that the Commission violated transparency legislation when it refused to disclose the messages.

Now the Commission must disclose the conversations or provide a more credible explanation for why it cannot disclose them.

In spring 2021, it emerged that the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla, had private text message conversations in connection with the comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine agreement concluded between the EU and the pharmaceutical company. The agreement covered 1.8 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccine, but few details of how it was reached have been made public. For example, the price tag for each dose is still not known.

When a journalist from the New York Times requested the text message conversations between von der Leyen and Bourla, it was announced that these had been deleted. The following year, the European Court of Auditors reviewed the case and questioned why the European Commission did not disclose the text messages or other written details of the agreement. Furthermore, the Commission is said to have chosen not to share any written details of the agreement, something it has been transparent about in the past, which was of course also questioned by the Court.

The European Court of Auditors has no authority to demand more information about the text message conversations, but the New York Times chose in 2023 to file a lawsuit in the matter and this week the case was brought before the European Court of Justice. The court was asked to examine whether the European Commission had breached the law by not disclosing the conversations.

Court: “Must provide credible explanations”

The court’s decision finds that the European Commission did break the law when it refused to disclose the text message conversations between the chairman and the CEO, reports the New York Times. Under EU transparency laws, the conversations should have been shared with the newspaper.

The European Commission claimed that it did not consider the conversations important and therefore deleted them and that they cannot be retrieved. However, it never explained the extent of the search for them, which the Court considers insufficient.

The commission cannot merely state that it does not hold the requested documents but must provide credible explanations enabling the public and the court to understand why those documents cannot be found”, the Court said.

It is unclear whether the text messages have actually been deleted, but the court ruled that the European Commission must now either disclose the conversations, or at least provide a more detailed and credible explanation as to why they cannot be disclosed. In a statement, the European Commission said it would “adopt a new decision providing a more detailed explanation”.

Top EU court rules on von der Leyen’s secret Pfizer messages

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 13 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
According to critics, transparency in the EU has decreased significantly under von der Leyen's rule.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s handling of secret text messages with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is now under scrutiny in a court case that threatens to destroy her political legacy and further erode confidence in the EU’s decision-making process.

Tomorrow, the EU General Court will rule on whether the European Commission broke the law by refusing to release text messages exchanged between von der Leyen and Bourla during negotiations on a controversial COVID-19 vaccine deal worth billions.

The ruling is expected to further undermine confidence in von der Leyen’s leadership, which is already heavily criticized for its abuse of power and centralization of decision-making. Among other things, the case concerns whether text messages should be classified as official documents and thus subject to EU transparency rules.

The case was initiated by The New York Times and its former Brussels correspondent, who took the matter to court after the Commission’s decision to refuse to publish the text messages in 2022.

In an interview with the NYT in 2021, Bourla revealed that he and von der Leyen had built up a “deep trust” through their text message negotiations. The agreement, which was concluded in May 2021, meant that the EU purchased up to 1.8 billion doses of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine – the largest single vaccine purchase during the COVID crisis.

– This court ruling could mark a turning point for transparency in the EU. When it comes to key decisions, particularly those affecting public health, secrecy should be avoided, said Shari Hinds, EU policy director at Transparency International.

“The elephant who wasn’t in the room”

In 2022, EU Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly (2013–2025) ruled that the Commission had committed serious administrative errors by not even searching for the text messages. She called it a “wake-up call” for the EU institutions and said that transparency had declined during von der Leyen’s tenure.

– Information is being held back for political reasons and that culture comes from the top, O’Reilly told Politico in 2023, also criticizing von der Leyen’s absence during the trial:

– The elephant who wasn’t in the room. The one person who could tell us everything wasn’t there.

The European Commission has repeatedly refused to comment on the case, but an official claimed at a press conference that the vaccine agreements were negotiated with the full support of the member states.

“Transparency must be a priority”

The court has previously criticized the Commission’s censorship of the vaccine contracts, large parts of which have been classified as confidential on the grounds of commercial interests.

Tilly Metz, a Green MEP, was one of many who soon wondered who or what was behind von der Leyen’s reluctance to share the information.

– She gets bad advice there. If you want the public to be confident and trust the politicians and what they do – and the contacts they do with industry – you have to put the focus on transparency.

“Confused” dossier

During a hearing in November 2023, judges expressed skepticism about the Commission’s refusal to hand over the text messages. When the Commission’s lawyers finally acknowledged that the messages existed, they were met with laughter in the courtroom.

– We do not deny that they exist, said Commission lawyer Paolo Stancanelli during the hearing. He defended the Commission’s actions by arguing that the text messages were not relevant to the contract negotiations – a claim that the judges sharply questioned.

One judge, José Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, ruled that the Commission had not taken “adequate and diligent measures” to justify the secrecy, while another, Paul Nihoul, criticized the “relatively confused” dossier.

The pressure on von der Leyen is increasing further through an investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), which is looking into how the vaccine purchases were handled. In March, EPPO chief Laura Codruța Kövesi also confirmed that Commission officials had been questioned.

The EPPO is refraining from commenting on ongoing investigations, but the case risks further increasing mistrust in von der Leyen’s leadership and is expected to make it even more difficult for her to hold together an already deeply divided EU alliance.

US defense secretary: “No more vaccine mandates”

Donald Trump's USA

Published 7 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Hegseth has previously described the slogan "our diversity is our strength" as "the single dumbest phrase in military history".

Yesterday, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth strongly criticized left-wing liberal so-called diversity and inclusion programs within the military and reiterated the message that there is no future for such destructive phenomena within the US Armed Forces.

In a speech delivered at the Special Operations Forces Week conference, the defense secretary declared that climate alarmism, LGBTQ lobbying, and vaccine mandates are over, and that from now on, the focus will be solely on issues that are actually relevant to the military.

– No more pronouns, no more climate change obsession, no more emergency vaccine mandates, and no more dudes in dresses.

– We’re done with that shit, Hegseth continued.

Hegseth’s statements follow a US Supreme Court ruling that gives the green light to the Trump administration’s efforts to strengthen the military’s focus by restricting the participation of transgender people in the armed forces.

The decision is based on an executive order signed in January, shortly after Donald Trump took office, with the aim of ensuring what the administration describes as an effective and unified defense force.

“The dumbest phrase in military history”

The Nordic Times has previously highlighted Hegseth’s views on diversity programs in the US military and how he condemned the left-liberal rhetoric previously used by the military leadership.

– I think the single dumbest phrase in military history is ‘our diversity is our strength’, Hegseth explained at a meeting with Defense Department employees at the Pentagon.

– I think our strength is our unity, our strength is our shared purpose, regardless of our background, regardless of how we grew up, regardless of our gender, regardless of our race, he continued, promising to do everything in his power to remove left-wing activist influence from the army.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.