Saturday, August 16, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Why you should have plants in your home

Published 13 October 2024
– By Editorial Staff
6 minute read

The right plants can significantly reduce harmful air pollutants. Additionally, their presence has been linked to lower stress levels and increased productivity.

The biophilia hypothesis proposes that humans have an inherent connection to nature, and as a result, experience comfort and well-being when immersed in it. A number of studies also show that spending time in nature can have major health benefits for us. For example, being close to nature at home tends to reduce the use of antidepressants and boost self-esteem. Studies also show that spending time in nature can positively change people’s perspective on time.

At the same time, there is also comfort for those who have difficulty getting to the forest. Studies suggest that even houseplants at home or work can have similar effects.

All plants produce oxygen and also absorb carbon dioxide. Some plants can also help purify the air and even improve humidity levels. As early as 1989, NASA was researching the effect of plants on the air in enclosed spaces as spacecraft are unable to ventilate away harmful substances. The study mainly used plants that do better in low-light environments, focusing on how plants can purify the toxic substances benzene, trichloroethylene and formaldehyde. The NASA study found that a lot of houseplants actually removed toxic substances from the air, at least partially.

Reducing stress

In a 2015 study, researchers wanted to look at the possible psychological and physiological health benefits of indoor plants. In this study, 24 young male participants were asked to either replant a houseplant or complete a brief computer-based task, after which their heart rate and blood pressure were measured. Participants who worked with the plants showed lower blood pressure and generally felt calmer compared to those who performed the computer task. In contrast, those who used the computer reported feeling more discomfort, and their blood pressure increased.

Even just looking at pictures of houseplants can have health benefits, according to another 2012 study. It exposed patients in a hospital waiting room to real plants, pictures of plants or no nature at all and compared the results. Both the real plants and the pictures of plants contributed to lower stress levels compared to having no nature at all in the waiting room.

Research also shows that houseplants can help people heal from injury or illness. An umbrella study found that hospitalized patients with a view of houseplants or trees were calmer and had better conditions for well-being compared to those without. They also typically required less pain medication and had shorter hospital stays than other patients.

Plants create happiness

Some research also suggests that houseplants can simply make you happier. For example, a 2013 study found that participants who spent five to ten minutes in a room with a few houseplants felt happier than those who were in a room without plants. Plants, or rather nature, are also generally thought to increase self-esteem and yet another study suggests that there is a very strong link between being close to nature and feeling happy.

Another study, published in 2019, found that green and purple plants in particular were effective in counteracting negative emotions.

Increases productivity

In a Korean study, primary school students were placed in classrooms with either a fake plant, a real plant, a photo of a plant, or no plant at all. Brain scans revealed that only the children exposed to a real plant showed significant improvements in attention and concentration. Similarly, a study from the Netherlands found that children in classrooms with a green plant wall performed better on tests of selective attention, which involves focusing on a specific task while filtering out distractions.

An older study from 1996 tried to implement potted plants in a windowless laboratory at a university. They found that, on average, students worked 12% faster if they had plants in the lab, compared to without. In another study, those working in a call center with a view of potted plants took 7% more calls compared to those without a plant view. Another study also tested implementing plants in three different offices in the UK and the Netherlands and found that those who had access to plants at their workplace were on average 15% more productive.

Air purifying plants

There are many plants that are claimed to purify the air of toxins, but some stand out in studies for their properties. If you’re in the market for a new houseplant but don’t know what to get, here are a few plants to consider.

Peace Lily (Spathiphyllum wallisii)

This plant is very common as a houseplant and should be easy to care for. It does not thrive in direct sunlight, but light, partial shade and even shade should be fine. It needs plenty of water and during the spring to fall you can also give nutrition once a month, but skip it during the winter.

Peace lilies are said to be one of the most air-purifying plants to have indoors. The NASA study found that it could reduce the toxic substance benzene by as much as 79.5% in just 24 hours. In the case of trichloroethylene, it reduced it by 23%, the highest reduction of any plant tested. It also removed 16,167 micrograms of formaldehyde in one day.

A 2022 study by researchers at the University of Birmingham tested three common houseplants, including the Peace Lily, to see if they could help remove air pollution in the home. All three plants were found to be effective against air pollution, removing around half of the nitrogen dioxide they were exposed to – in just one hour.

The Peace Lily is also said to be an effective humidifier as the leaves emit water vapor.

Peace Lily. Montage. Photo: Outi Marjaana, Elena Golovchenko/Pexels

Corn Plant (Dracaena fragrans)

Corn Plant is considered a shrub, or small tree. It thrives in semi-shade or shade and doesn’t need too much water, but the soil should be kept slightly moist. During winter it needs light, but does not like direct sunlight. Nutrition can be given once a month during winter

This plant was also included in the 2022 study, and is thus effective against air pollution, just like the Peace Lily. The NASA study also found that the plant was effective against formaldehyde

Corn Plant. Photo: feey/Unsplash

Ivy (Hedera helix)

The ivy does not like strong sunlight and likes to have a shower of water from time to time.

The leaves of the plant have long been used as a medicine for respiratory inflammations and are supposed to be expectorant. Today it is used as an active ingredient in medicines.

Ivy was also included in NASA’s study and proved to be the best of all plants at reducing benzene levels, by as much as 89.8% over 24 hours. In the case of trichloroethylene, it removed 10.9% over the same time. When eliminating formaldehyde, the plant reduced it by 9 653 micrograms over 24 hours.

Ivy. Photo: Jaunathan Gagnon/Unsplash

ZZ Plant (Zamioculcas zamiifolia)

ZZ Plant, also known as Eternity Plant, is hardy and can grow in both light and shade, but should not be placed in full sun. It will grow faster in a brighter position and the leaves will turn darker in a darker position. It’s good to allow the soil to dry out between waterings.

A 2013 study showed that the plant can effectively remove harmful substances such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) from indoor environments. In another 2020 study, the plant was found to be particularly good at reducing concentrations of ethylbenzene. The researchers also saw positive effects when combined with other plants such as Sansevieria trifasciata to improve air purification of toluene and formaldehyde, among others.

This plant was also included in the previous study from 2022, and is thus effective against air pollutants.

ZZ Plant. Montage. Photo: WeFt, feey/CC BY-SA 3.0

True Aloe (Aloe vera)

Aloe vera thrives in well-drained soil, so it’s a good idea to put Leca balls in the bottom of the pot. It likes plenty of sun, but not too much water. Watering about twice a month is usually enough. Aloe vera is known for its many healing and health-giving properties, both internally and externally, but it is also said to be an excellent helper in purifying the air in the home.

True Aloe. Photo: Cecília O. Tommasini/Pexels

Two different review studies show that Aloe vera is effective in removing formaldehyde and benzene, but also xylenes. The plant was also included in the NASA study, which found that it could remove 1,555 micrograms of formaldehyde over 24 hours.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Doctor testifies about vaccine injuries in US Senate hearing

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 31 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The American anesthesiologist Dr. Robert Sullivan testified before the U.S. Senate in a hearing titled "Voices of the Vaccine Injured".
3 minute read

An anesthesiologist with 20 years of experience told US senators how he developed a life-threatening lung disease after covid-19 vaccination. Dr. Robert Sullivan was one of the witnesses in a Senate hearing on vaccine injuries held by the Senate Homeland Security Committee.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee organized a hearing on July 15 titled “Voices of the Vaccine Injured” where people who claim to have been injured by covid-19 vaccines were able to share their experiences. Dr. Robert Sullivan, a licensed physician and certified anesthesiologist with over 20 years of active practice in Maryland, was one of the key witnesses.

Dr. Sullivan described a dramatic change in his health condition after vaccination. The same month he received his first mRNA dose, he had been featured in the Wall Street Journal’s fitness column for his aerial circus performances.

I was strong, healthy, and thriving. Just three weeks after my second dose, I couldn’t go up a flight of stairs without gasping for air, Sullivan told the senators.

The doctor developed constant chest pain, heart arrhythmias and overwhelming fatigue. An echocardiogram later confirmed damage to his heart and lungs.

The diagnosis was pulmonary hypertension. I had damage and narrowing of the blood vessels in my lungs, restricting blood flow and straining the heart. This isn’t like regular high blood pressure.  Pulmonary hypertension is usually progressive and fatal even with treatment. There is no cure, Sullivan explained.

The system didn’t respond

Dr. Sullivan reported his injury to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), the US system for reporting vaccine adverse events. Despite VAERS collecting his medical records, he never heard from the US health authorities FDA or CDC.

I believed in the system. I believed I would be heard. When I wasn’t, I channeled that disbelief into collaborating with the British Medical Journal on a report about the system’s failures. What I learned is chilling. If you are harmed, you are on your own., Sullivan said.

He explained that most doctors he knows have never heard of VAERS, and even fewer understand that there are mandatory reporting requirements. Sullivan was never taught about VAERS during his medical education and stated that it still isn’t taught.

Research predicted the problems

During his own research, Dr. Sullivan discovered that a scientist from Georgetown University had predicted exactly his type of injury in the same month the vaccines began rolling out.

He warned that spike protein, exposure, whether from the virus or from the shot, could harm the blood vessels in the lungs and placenta, Sullivan recounted.

The doctor referenced studies showing that spike protein from the SARS-1 virus also caused vascular damage in animals, and that many hospitalized covid patients develop pulmonary hypertension.

Broad vaccination perspective despite personal injury

When Senator Johnson asked about doctors’ attitudes toward vaccines, Dr. Sullivan surprised by explaining that he is still “enthusiastic about vaccination” and that he sees covid injections as something entirely different.

I’m not vaccine injured. I’m injured by an mRNA therapeutic. I was very careful in my testimony to use the word shot, Sullivan clarified.

He explained that training for vaccines is now limited to memorizing the schedule, but that the hidden cost of injuries is not studied or taught.

Spike protein toxicity

Senator Johnson raised the question of spike protein toxicity and criticized that many symptoms are now attributed to “long covid” instead of potential vaccine side effects.

There are many ways to lose with this new MRI technology. There are problems with the nanoparticle. There is a separate set of problems with synthetic mRNA. It persists in some people 700 days and counting now, Dr. Sullivan responded.

He explained that when the body is instructed to manufacture a protein that is presented on the cell surface, it creates a precondition for autoimmune disorders, and that the spike protein itself is biologically active.

—  It was published in December 2020, although not widely known, that that was causing damage to placenta and to lung, Sullivan added.

Dr. Sullivan concluded his testimony with an appeal for recognition and transparent information for patients, emphasizing the importance of truly informed consent in all medical treatment.

Study: Pfizer’s covid vaccine may cause eye damage

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 22 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
According to the study, the covid vaccine may cause the cornea to thicken and reduce the number of important cells that keep vision clear.
2 minute read

Turkish researchers have discovered that Pfizer’s covid-19 vaccine can cause changes in the eye’s cornea that could potentially lead to vision problems. The study, which followed 64 people over three months, shows that the vaccine can make the cornea thicker and reduce the number of important cells that keep vision clear.

The researchers measured changes in the cornea’s inner layer, the endothelium, before the first vaccine dose and two months after the second dose. The results showed that both doses led to thicker corneas, fewer endothelial cells, and greater variation in cell size.

Specifically, corneal thickness increased from 528 to 542 micrometers – an increase of approximately two percent. At the same time, the number of endothelial cells decreased from 2,597 to 2,378 cells per square millimeter, a loss of about eight percent.

“The endothelium should be closely monitored in those with low endothelial cell counts or who have undergone corneal transplantation,” the researchers warn in the study published in the journal Ophthalmic Epidemiology.

Short-term impact without symptoms

In the short term, the changes suggest that Pfizer’s vaccine may temporarily weaken the endothelium, even though patients did not experience any clear vision problems during the study period. For people with healthy eyes, these small changes are unlikely to affect vision immediately.

However, if the changes persist for several years, they could lead to corneal swelling or blurred vision, particularly in people with existing eye problems or those who have undergone corneal transplantation. A thicker cornea and reduced cell density can contribute to conditions such as corneal edema or corneal decompensation, which in severe cases can cause permanent vision loss.

Need for long-term studies

The research team emphasizes the importance of long-term studies to see if the changes persist months and years after vaccination. An ophthalmologist can use special microscopy to check if someone has a low endothelial cell count.

The study adds to a growing list of concerns regarding Pfizer’s covid vaccine. In May, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) forced Pfizer and Moderna to expand warning labels about risks of heart damage, particularly for men between 16 and 25 years old.

Foods you shouldn’t keep past their “best before” dates

Published 22 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
3 minute read

Much of the food we eat is still good after its best before date. However, you should be more careful about keeping certain foods for too long.

In Europe, two durability markings are used for food: “best before” to show when quality may start to deteriorate, and “use by date” for products that quickly become unsafe to eat. The latter marking is uncommon and mainly applies to sensitive foods. Opened packages often have shorter shelf lives, but this can vary.

Frozen and dried foods often last longer than their best before dates. Even fresh products like eggs, milk and butter keep longer than indicated on the packaging.

Consumers are often encouraged not to be too strict about throwing away food that has reached its best before date, in order to reduce food waste. In 2023, each Swede threw away an average of 16 kilos of food as food waste, according to Avfall Sverige (Swedish Waste Management).

Despite these recommendations, there are exceptions where you should be more careful about throwing away food when it reaches its expiration date, writes Land.se.

Herring and cured salmon

Cured and smoked fish can contain listeria bacteria, which can be dangerous for small children, elderly people and those with compromised immune systems. Since the bacteria cannot be detected by smell or appearance, it’s important to follow the use by date. Opened packages should be consumed quickly.

Baltic herring, herring, tuna, mackerel and anchovies contain a considerable amount of the amino acid histidine. This amino acid is later converted to histamine when certain bacterial species thrive after the fish has been stored too warm for several hours. This can cause histamine poisoning, which can produce symptoms such as rash, diarrhea, nausea and heart palpitations.

Bread

A sure way to know when bread should be thrown away is when you see a mold spot. Unlike cheese, where it’s okay to cut away the mold and then eat it, this doesn’t apply to bread. The visible mold is probably only part of it – the rest of the mold fungus consists of long invisible threads that can be present throughout the bread slice.

Meat and poultry

Usually meat, poultry and shellfish have a use by date marking, which means it can be dangerous to health to eat after that date. However, you can freeze it before the last day if you don’t have time to eat it all, then it can keep in the freezer for a longer time – depending on the type of meat.

Ground meat, such as minced meat, is particularly sensitive to bacteria. Often it’s decomposition bacteria that make the mince smell and taste bad – there’s rarely a risk of disease transmission but it makes the mince inedible.

Yogurt and fresh cheese

Often yogurt, fresh cheese and crème fraîche keep past their best before date, but if you see the slightest mold formation, you should throw them away. Since the products contain a lot of water, there’s a risk that mold toxins spread throughout the entire food product.

Pharmaceutical giant’s top researcher on covid vaccine: “Nothing was safe and effective”

The criticized covid vaccinations

  • Joshua Rys, a leading regulatory researcher at pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J), now confirms on hidden camera what mainstream media dismissed as "conspiracy theories".
  • "Do you have any idea the lack of research that was done on those products?" Rys asks rhetorically in the clip, among other things.
  • The slogans "safe and effective" that surrounded the mass vaccination campaign were, in his view, a direct lie from the authorities.
  • "This was just, let's test it on some lab route models, analyze and see if it works and stuff like that, and just roll it to the wind and see what happens", he adds.
Published 16 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The hidden recording confirms many concerns that have surrounded the COVID vaccines.
1 minute read

Joshua Rys leads the creation and implementation of regulatory strategies for new and existing products within Johnson & Johnson in his role.

— We run the whole soup to nuts. Not only are we working on the products, but everything that has to do with the drug. We have to make sure that you understand how to use the drug, how to be able to prescribe certain pieces of information, how to communicate that to the patient, he explains his role.

In front of independent journalist James O’Keefe’s OMG hidden cameras, he confirms that Johnson & Johnson was well aware that the preparation was not safe and effective.

— Do you have any idea the lack of research that was done on those products? You shouldn’t be surprised that this happened. It was pretty much the government kind of made a deal with pharmaceutical companies and kind of pressured the pharmaceutical companies, because we’re not going to say no to the government.

— I mean, none of that stuff was safe and effective. We didn’t do the typical test. The typical process, that’s why it takes so long to get a product on market, the typical process is all this clinical trial testing and stuff in a small population, Rys continues.

— This was just, let’s test it on some lab route models, analyze and see if it works and stuff like that, and just roll it to the wind and see what happens, he adds.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.