Monday, May 12, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Why you should have plants in your home

Published 13 October 2024
– By Editorial Staff

The right plants can significantly reduce harmful air pollutants. Additionally, their presence has been linked to lower stress levels and increased productivity.

The biophilia hypothesis proposes that humans have an inherent connection to nature, and as a result, experience comfort and well-being when immersed in it. A number of studies also show that spending time in nature can have major health benefits for us. For example, being close to nature at home tends to reduce the use of antidepressants and boost self-esteem. Studies also show that spending time in nature can positively change people’s perspective on time.

At the same time, there is also comfort for those who have difficulty getting to the forest. Studies suggest that even houseplants at home or work can have similar effects.

All plants produce oxygen and also absorb carbon dioxide. Some plants can also help purify the air and even improve humidity levels. As early as 1989, NASA was researching the effect of plants on the air in enclosed spaces as spacecraft are unable to ventilate away harmful substances. The study mainly used plants that do better in low-light environments, focusing on how plants can purify the toxic substances benzene, trichloroethylene and formaldehyde. The NASA study found that a lot of houseplants actually removed toxic substances from the air, at least partially.

Reducing stress

In a 2015 study, researchers wanted to look at the possible psychological and physiological health benefits of indoor plants. In this study, 24 young male participants were asked to either replant a houseplant or complete a brief computer-based task, after which their heart rate and blood pressure were measured. Participants who worked with the plants showed lower blood pressure and generally felt calmer compared to those who performed the computer task. In contrast, those who used the computer reported feeling more discomfort, and their blood pressure increased.

Even just looking at pictures of houseplants can have health benefits, according to another 2012 study. It exposed patients in a hospital waiting room to real plants, pictures of plants or no nature at all and compared the results. Both the real plants and the pictures of plants contributed to lower stress levels compared to having no nature at all in the waiting room.

Research also shows that houseplants can help people heal from injury or illness. An umbrella study found that hospitalized patients with a view of houseplants or trees were calmer and had better conditions for well-being compared to those without. They also typically required less pain medication and had shorter hospital stays than other patients.

Plants create happiness

Some research also suggests that houseplants can simply make you happier. For example, a 2013 study found that participants who spent five to ten minutes in a room with a few houseplants felt happier than those who were in a room without plants. Plants, or rather nature, are also generally thought to increase self-esteem and yet another study suggests that there is a very strong link between being close to nature and feeling happy.

Another study, published in 2019, found that green and purple plants in particular were effective in counteracting negative emotions.

Increases productivity

In a Korean study, primary school students were placed in classrooms with either a fake plant, a real plant, a photo of a plant, or no plant at all. Brain scans revealed that only the children exposed to a real plant showed significant improvements in attention and concentration. Similarly, a study from the Netherlands found that children in classrooms with a green plant wall performed better on tests of selective attention, which involves focusing on a specific task while filtering out distractions.

An older study from 1996 tried to implement potted plants in a windowless laboratory at a university. They found that, on average, students worked 12% faster if they had plants in the lab, compared to without. In another study, those working in a call center with a view of potted plants took 7% more calls compared to those without a plant view. Another study also tested implementing plants in three different offices in the UK and the Netherlands and found that those who had access to plants at their workplace were on average 15% more productive.

Air purifying plants

There are many plants that are claimed to purify the air of toxins, but some stand out in studies for their properties. If you’re in the market for a new houseplant but don’t know what to get, here are a few plants to consider.

Peace Lily (Spathiphyllum wallisii)

This plant is very common as a houseplant and should be easy to care for. It does not thrive in direct sunlight, but light, partial shade and even shade should be fine. It needs plenty of water and during the spring to fall you can also give nutrition once a month, but skip it during the winter.

Peace lilies are said to be one of the most air-purifying plants to have indoors. The NASA study found that it could reduce the toxic substance benzene by as much as 79.5% in just 24 hours. In the case of trichloroethylene, it reduced it by 23%, the highest reduction of any plant tested. It also removed 16,167 micrograms of formaldehyde in one day.

A 2022 study by researchers at the University of Birmingham tested three common houseplants, including the Peace Lily, to see if they could help remove air pollution in the home. All three plants were found to be effective against air pollution, removing around half of the nitrogen dioxide they were exposed to – in just one hour.

The Peace Lily is also said to be an effective humidifier as the leaves emit water vapor.

Peace Lily. Montage. Photo: Outi Marjaana, Elena Golovchenko/Pexels

Corn Plant (Dracaena fragrans)

Corn Plant is considered a shrub, or small tree. It thrives in semi-shade or shade and doesn’t need too much water, but the soil should be kept slightly moist. During winter it needs light, but does not like direct sunlight. Nutrition can be given once a month during winter

This plant was also included in the 2022 study, and is thus effective against air pollution, just like the Peace Lily. The NASA study also found that the plant was effective against formaldehyde

Corn Plant. Photo: feey/Unsplash

Ivy (Hedera helix)

The ivy does not like strong sunlight and likes to have a shower of water from time to time.

The leaves of the plant have long been used as a medicine for respiratory inflammations and are supposed to be expectorant. Today it is used as an active ingredient in medicines.

Ivy was also included in NASA’s study and proved to be the best of all plants at reducing benzene levels, by as much as 89.8% over 24 hours. In the case of trichloroethylene, it removed 10.9% over the same time. When eliminating formaldehyde, the plant reduced it by 9 653 micrograms over 24 hours.

Ivy. Photo: Jaunathan Gagnon/Unsplash

ZZ Plant (Zamioculcas zamiifolia)

ZZ Plant, also known as Eternity Plant, is hardy and can grow in both light and shade, but should not be placed in full sun. It will grow faster in a brighter position and the leaves will turn darker in a darker position. It’s good to allow the soil to dry out between waterings.

A 2013 study showed that the plant can effectively remove harmful substances such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) from indoor environments. In another 2020 study, the plant was found to be particularly good at reducing concentrations of ethylbenzene. The researchers also saw positive effects when combined with other plants such as Sansevieria trifasciata to improve air purification of toluene and formaldehyde, among others.

This plant was also included in the previous study from 2022, and is thus effective against air pollutants.

ZZ Plant. Montage. Photo: WeFt, feey/CC BY-SA 3.0

True Aloe (Aloe vera)

Aloe vera thrives in well-drained soil, so it’s a good idea to put Leca balls in the bottom of the pot. It likes plenty of sun, but not too much water. Watering about twice a month is usually enough. Aloe vera is known for its many healing and health-giving properties, both internally and externally, but it is also said to be an excellent helper in purifying the air in the home.

True Aloe. Photo: Cecília O. Tommasini/Pexels

Two different review studies show that Aloe vera is effective in removing formaldehyde and benzene, but also xylenes. The plant was also included in the NASA study, which found that it could remove 1,555 micrograms of formaldehyde over 24 hours.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Sauerkraut may help your stomach

Published today 10:23
– By Editorial Staff

Sauerkraut may protect the intestinal lining from inflammation, according to an American study. During fermentation, the nutritional content of cabbage changes – including an increase in levels of lactic acid, amino acids, and other beneficial substances that are formed during the breakdown and can promote gut health.

Fermentation is a natural process where microorganisms like lactic acid bacteria and yeast break down sugars in food. This often results in the conversion of sugar into lactic acid or alcohol. The process not only helps preserve the food – it also produces probiotics, meaning live bacteria that are beneficial for the gut.

Fermented foods have been eaten for thousands of years around the world. For example, eating fermented vegetables makes the nutrients in the food easier for the body to absorb, and some studies show that vitamin levels can actually increase. There are also studies that suggest fermented foods can have positive effects on health, particularly for digestion and the immune system.

Sauerkraut better than raw cabbage

Researchers at the University of California Davis in the USA tested whether the nutrients in sauerkraut could help protect intestinal cells from inflammation-related damage. The study compared sauerkraut, raw cabbage, and the brine left over after the cabbage fermentation process.

The experiments were conducted on an artificial intestinal wall exposed to inflammation by adding so-called cytokines – which are known to damage the intestinal lining. These can be activated in the gut, for example, by consuming too much ultra-processed food or too much sugar or salt.

Fermentation increases beneficial substances

The results showed that sauerkraut can protect the intestinal lining from inflammation caused by cytokines. Raw cabbage and the brine, however, did not help protect the gut. It didn’t matter whether the sauerkraut was store-bought or homemade.

Chemical analyses show that fermentation changes the nutritional profile of cabbage and increases the amount of beneficial metabolites such as lactic acid, amino acids, and plant compounds, which in turn are linked to gut health. These changes may explain why fermented foods are often associated with digestive benefits.

– Some of the metabolites we find in the sauerkraut are the same kind of metabolites we’re finding to be made by the gut microbiome, so that gives us a little more confidence that this connection we found between the metabolites in sauerkraut and good gut health makes sense, says Professor Maria Marco in a press release.

The researchers have found hundreds of different metabolites that are formed during fermentation and that they are now working to determine which ones play the biggest role in supporting long-term gut health. The next step in the research is to conduct studies in humans to see if the gut-protective metabolites found in sauerkraut can have the same positive effects when included in the daily diet, as was shown in the lab.

A little bit of sauerkraut could go a long way, she says. We should be thinking about including these fermented foods in our regular diets and not just as a side on our hot dogs.

After the shots – now the COVID vaccine is headed for the lungs

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 6 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Initially, 350 participants are taking part in the clinical trials - but it is hoped that the vaccine will be tested on many more Canadians.

The COVID vaccine AeroVax is not to be injected – but inhaled according to a method that will be tested in Canada with government funding. This is despite previous vaccines being linked to millions of reported side effects and vaccine injuries, including heart muscle inflammation, blood clots, and sudden deaths.

At McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, researchers have launched a phase 2 study of a new COVID vaccine that is not administered by injection but is instead inhaled.

The vaccine, named ChAd-triCoV/Mac, will now be tested on 350 participants from across the country, with $8 million in government funding, and researchers say they hope the new vaccine will provide stronger protection against infection than previous injection-based vaccines.

While the current, needle-based COVID-19 vaccines have prevented a tremendous amount of death and hospitalization, they haven’t really changed a lot of people’s experience with getting recurrent infections, claims Fiona Smaill, professor in the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine and one of the study’s leaders.

We’re looking to change that by providing robust protection directly at the site of infection, she declares.

Targets three virus proteins

The new vaccine differs from previous COVID vaccines in several ways. In addition to being administered as an aerosol inhalation, it targets three different proteins in the structure of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. According to the researchers, this should improve protection against any future variants of COVID.

When a vaccine is inhaled, the body’s immune system reacts differently than when it is injected, which McMasters claims is more effective in preventing the infection itself.

Results from preclinical studies, together with unpublished data from the phase 1 study, suggest that the inhaled vaccine elicits a stronger immune response than traditional injections because it targets the airways where the virus first enters the body.

For those already vaccinated – but not recently ill

AeroVax is intended for people who have already received at least three doses of an mRNA vaccine. To participate in the study, participants must not have had COVID-19 or been vaccinated in the three months prior to registration. Participants must be between 18 and 65 years of age, free of lung disease, and able to attend all on-site testing sessions.

The study includes 350 participants from across Canada. Two-thirds will receive the vaccine and one-third a placebo. None of the participants know which group they belong to, which the researchers say is crucial for an objective evaluation.

Randomization allows for objective comparison between those who received the vaccine and those who didn’t, which can tell us a lot about the level of protection the vaccine could provide and its side effects, Smaill continues.

“Ensures the safety of participants”

The study is led by researchers at McMaster’s Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, and all development – from laboratory design to testing – is taking place in Canada.

Every medicine or vaccine that we use and trust today has at one point gone through similar clinical trials processes, says Matthew Miller, director of the institute and a member of the research team.

This is a highly regulated process with extensive oversight that ensures the safety of participants and will generate critical data to inform the next steps in development, he adds.

If the results are promising, the researchers plan to move on to a Phase 3 study with a larger group of participants – a step toward approval and market introduction.

Previous COVID vaccines were usually administered with a syringe. Photo: Canstockphoto

Millions of side effects

In this context, it is worth mentioning that since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines began, millions of side effects and vaccine injuries, including deaths, have been reported globally – ranging from fever and nerve damage to blood clots, heart muscle inflammation, and sudden death.

Young men have shown an increased risk of heart inflammation, which has led to certain vaccines being withdrawn or restricted in several countries, and many have come forward to testify about long-term vaccine injuries that affect their ability to work and their quality of life – but their stories have been silenced or dismissed by the healthcare system.

Critics argue that authorities and vaccine manufacturers prioritized rapid distribution over transparency and safety, and that the long-term effects are still very poorly understood.

The vaccine is also believed to have had virtually no effect on the spread of infection, and US health authorities were eventually forced to admit that vaccinated people could carry as much of the virus as unvaccinated people. In Sweden, too, healthcare providers concluded that the vaccine did not stop the spread of COVID-19.

Young Swedes consume too much sugar

Published 1 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff

70 percent of Swedish youth consume more sugar than recommended, according to a dissertation from the University of Gothenburg. Primarily, young people consume soda, candy, and pastries.

The thesis looked at how much free and added sugar Swedish young people consume, something that has not previously been studied to any great extent. Added sugar refers, for example, to sugar in soft drinks, candy, cakes, pastries and some breakfast cereals, while free sugar includes both added and natural sugar found in, for example, honey, syrup and juice.

Since there are guidelines for the intake of both added sugar, and since 2023 also for free sugar, it’s important to be able to follow up on how well these guidelines are adhered to, to have a basis for promoting public health through various health-promoting efforts, says Julia Wanselius, who wrote the thesis, in a press release.

The limits for the recommended maximum intake of sugar in Sweden are set in relation to the amount of calories consumed and then expressed in energy percent (E%). The intake of both added and free sugars is recommended to be limited to a maximum of ten energy percent, in other words, no more than ten percent of the calorie intake per day should be sugar. For an adult, this corresponds to approximately 50-75 grams of sugar per day.

Sugar linked to lower nutrient intake

The results show that only 30% of Swedish teenagers stay below the recommended maximum intake for sugar, which means that around 70% eat too much sugar.

The biggest sources of sugar are soft drinks, candy, cakes and pastries, which together account for about 70 percent of the added sugar that young people eat. The study also shows that a high intake of sugar is linked to a lower intake of important nutrients such as vitamins, minerals and whole grains.

One of the conclusions of the thesis is that the information around sugar intake would need to change to influence young people to eat less. Instead of focusing only on recommending less sugar, Wanselius suggests that the guidelines should instead focus on reducing the consumption of certain specific foods such as soft drinks and sweets.

Future of EU-wide PFAS ban remains unclear

Published 24 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
It is well known that PFAS chemicals are directly harmful to health - but a European ban may still be some time away.

France has recently introduced a ban on carcinogenic PFAS chemicals in all cosmetic products.

A similar ban is also being discussed at EU level but it is highly unclear when it might actually be introduced

France is described as the first country in the Union to completely ban PFAS in the beauty and fashion industry. Since February, make-up containing the chemicals cannot be imported or exported although some substances are still exempt from the new regulations.

– I saw the film Dark Water about a poisoning scandal in the US and realized pretty quickly that this is the same kind of scandal that is happening around PFAS in Europe, French influencer, documentary filmmaker and activist Camille Étienne, 26, told tabloid Aftonbladet.

Through her reporting, she was instrumental in pushing through a ban and says that she herself tested her blood and discovered that it contained the harmful chemicals.

– Some of them are classified as carcinogenic by the WHO’s cancer research institute. The tragedy is that there is no way to get rid of PFAS already in the body. This is the asbestos of our generation, she continues.

Accumulates in food and drinking water

It has long been known that PFAS can affect fertility, cause liver damage, several types of cancer, weakened immune systems, and high cholesterol – and major cosmetics producers have frequently been pointed out as major culprits driving the poisoning of citizens.

PFAS refers to a group of thousands of highly persistent industrial chemicals often called “forever chemicals” because they remain for a very long time in both the environment and the human body.

These substances can accumulate in drinking water and food, thereby reaching people even in very small doses. Due to their long-term effects, PFAS is seen as a serious environmental and public health issue, and even at the EU level, a comprehensive ban on PFAS in consumer products is now under discussion.

“Impossible to say”

Sweden, together with countries like Norway and Denmark, has been a driving force in the matter, which is now being analyzed by the EU Chemicals Agency and various committees. However, the bureaucratic processes are expected to take a very long time, and a total ban is unlikely to become reality anytime soon – if it ever does.

It’s impossible to say when a ban might be in place. First, all uses must be evaluated. Then a consultation follows on SEAC’s (Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis) draft opinion. After that, the opinions of RAC (Risk Assessment Committee) and SEAC, together with the proposal, are sent to the Commission, which in turn drafts amendments to the restriction annex in the REACH regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals), says Jenny Ivarsson, strategic advisor at the Swedish Chemicals Agency.

This will then be discussed and voted on among the member states before a decision is reached, she continues.

The proposal was submitted as early as February 2023.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.