Monday, August 25, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Health expert: Sunlight more important for health than previously thought

Published 10 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
If you avoid burning yourself, there is no danger, says the health professional.
6 minute read

Nutritionist Fredrik Paulún, author of The Light Revolution (Ljusrevolutionen), says there are many serious misconceptions about the sun. One of the best things you can do for your health, Paulún says, is to make sure you get enough sunlight.

– We shouldn’t burn ourselves, but we should be in the sun as much as possible, he says.

Here are Paulún’s best tips and observations for the sunniest months of the year.

Fredrik Paulún is perhaps one of Sweden’s best-known health profiles and a trained nutritionist. In The Light Revolution, he describes how the sun, and especially light, is directly vital to us. While elsewhere people are often encouraged to sunbathe cautiously, he argues instead that people in Sweden today generally have a sun or light deficiency and should make sure they get much more sunlight.

Among other things, he explains that endorphins are produced when sunlight hits the skin, which he believes shows that the sun is beneficial to humans. What we are naturally attracted to is often based on the production of endorphins, and Paulún says it is perfectly logical to assume that the sun is necessary for human survival. According to the health expert, the sun’s bad reputation is “completely undeserved” and is at least as important for health as exercise and a good diet.

Sick without sun

Paulún believes that the sun has a positive effect on the entire body system, from the brain to the organs. In particular, it increases the energy production of the body’s mitochondria, whose function is to convert energy from food. “A lot of diseases have a ‘bone’ in poor mitochondrial function”, says the health expert.

– Without mitochondria, we’re screwed, he says in the podcast Health for the Unhealthy (Hälsa för ohälsosamma).

Paulún believes that the advice to avoid the sun is actually making us sick. Among other things, he points to a large number of studies that have been done comparing where you live on Earth, where latitude 0 is the equator, and it has been found that, for example, the autoimmune disease MS is almost non-existent at the equator, in other words, where there is a lot of sun. The disease increases the further away you are from the equator, where, for example, Sweden is quite affected by the disease.

The same goes for high blood pressure, which according to the health profile is more prevalent in countries further from the equator, where there is less sun. This is partly because the sun stimulates the production of nitric oxide, which dilates blood vessels and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease. In addition, mortality rates during the winter months are reported to be about 25% higher in countries far from the equator.

Sun avoidance as bad as smoking

Lack of sunlight can also contribute to increased body weight. Paulún also says that the risk of autoimmune diseases in particular is significantly reduced by getting enough sun, and that those who suffer from them can improve their symptoms by getting plenty of sun.

According to the profile, other research suggests that avoiding the sun carries the same risk of premature death as smoking. According to other research, after 20 years of sun exposure, people are generally 40% less likely to die from all forms of cancer.

The sun also stimulates the immune system, which reduces the risk of respiratory infections. Paulún points out that the sun also has a big practical impact when it comes to COVID, saying that in Sweden, people with darker skin are more affected by the disease because they have a higher need for sunlight.

– We now know that the sun also had a great impact on how severely ill people became from covid, for example, many people with darker skin died. This is a very important aspect when we talk about human health. We have different sun needs.

No sun protection factor

A large number of researchers and experts believe that sun protection is essential, and preferably as high a factor as possible. Dermatologist Petra Kjellman, for example, recently advised Swedish state broadcaster SVT to use at least SPF 30 or 50 during the summer.

However, Paulún argues that sunscreens can actually increase the risk of skin cancer because they remove the natural instinct to retreat from the sun. For example, a large study involving 50 regions and countries found that the more UV light you get without sunscreen, the less likely you are to develop the skin cancer malignant melanoma.

– Because it protects us, it is a hormetic stressor. It is simply a repair of the skin cells, he says.

He also points out that some sunscreens contain chemicals and endocrine disruptors that are absorbed into the skin. He says that while sunscreen protects against burning, it doesn’t protect against things like cancer or sun-induced wrinkles.

– Wearing sunscreen in Sweden is terrible, he says.

On the other hand, Paulún admits that he might use sunscreen on extremely rare occasions, it might be a bit on the nose when he goes out to sea. Otherwise, he avoids it altogether.

Sunbathe smart

Although natural sunlight is beneficial to health, too much UV radiation can cause damage to biological tissues. This can lead to sun damage, increased risk of malignant melanoma and skin aging. Paulún also mentions a study of 29,000 Swedish women in the southern part of the country. The women were divided into non-tanners, moderate tanners and active tanners. The women who were active tanners had a 1.1% risk of developing malignant melanoma, while the non-tanners had a 0.8% risk – in other words, a very small margin. However, the study found that the mortality rate was lower among active tanners than among non-tanners. For those who did not sunbathe, the mortality rate for skin cancer was nearly 36%, compared to only 11% for active sunbathers.

However, it is important not to get too much sun and not to burn yourself, Paulún emphasizes. “What you should focus on is building up a good tan, then you will not burn so easily. If you build up a good tan, you have protection equivalent to about 10 to 15 SPF”, he says. It is also important to be logical and sunbathe in moderation, get out of the sun if you get too much, and wear a hat and protective clothing. Have children wear UV protective clothing and a hat or cap.

– UV light just makes us feel good, says Fredrik. It is important. But we can also burn ourselves. So it’s important to find the right balance.

Morning sun the best

The most beautiful part of the day is the morning, according to Paulún. The sun is low and the UV light is filtered in the atmosphere, so almost nothing reaches you. At the same time, your body wakes up in the morning and your eyes get light. The sunlight is also milder in the evenings.

The sun is strongest during the day and if you want to avoid burning, it is probably best to sit in the shade or indoors if you are in even warmer latitudes such as Australia.

Vitamin D

UV light triggers the production of vitamin D, and Paulún says research suggests that naturally produced levels of the vitamin and high sun exposure are linked to the same health effects. However, supplements of the vitamin do not have the same effects. Studies show that vitamin D supplements reduce mortality from all causes in humans, but do not protect against diseases such as Alzheimer’s and type 2 diabetes. The health profile says that supplements can’t replace light, and if you have low levels of the vitamin, you probably don’t get enough sun.

Red light in winter

In Sweden there are few hours of sunshine during the winter, but Paulún still encourages people to try to get sun on their skin on the days when it is available. However, red light lamps can also be used in winter as a dietary supplement, which he strongly advocates.

In his book, Paulún explains that the sun emits electromagnetic radiation, which includes different forms of light, including ultraviolet (UV), in different wavelengths. The sun emits light in all the colors of the rainbow, but when all the wavelengths are mixed, the light looks white, for example, you can often see more red light in the evening, then you can often see more blue light during the day.

The red light, according to the health profile, is the one that produces the most biological effects. Red light lamps are available for home use and are also used in treatments. Paulún himself has a red light lamp at home that he routinely sits in front of for about 15 minutes every morning.

Fredrik Paulún

Photo: AndreasArgirakis/CC BY-SA 3.0

Nutritionist and writer, born July 20, 1970, who frequently appears on television, in newspapers and on radio programs. Paulún is also known for introducing Swedes to the now famous GI diet.

Paulún's brand was launched in Sweden in 2005, but since 2010 it has been owned by Orkla Foods Sverige AB.

He has written about 20 books on nutrition and health, including 50 Shortcuts to a Sugar-Free Life, The Truth About GI and LCHQ. His latest book, The Light Revolution (Ljusrevolutionen), was published last year.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Colorectal cancer affects more young Swedes

Published 23 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The study also shows that mortality has increased among both younger and older patients for up to ten years after cancer diagnosis.
2 minute read

Colorectal cancer is increasing among young people in Sweden, according to research from the Karolinska Institute. Researchers suggest that lifestyle factors, such as sedentary behavior and obesity, may be the cause.

In the study, which was published in Annals of Oncology, researchers examined over 135,000 Swedish patients who had colorectal cancer between 1993 and 2019.

The results show that the number of younger people under 50 who develop this form of cancer has increased over the past three decades. For rectal cancer, the number of new cases among younger people has increased by 2.04 percent per year, and for left-sided and right-sided colon cancer, the increase is 2.41 and 2.64 percent per year respectively. Overall, the disease has become two to three times more common among younger people.

Detected later in younger patients

Younger patients also more often had metastatic cancer compared to older patients, suggesting they had lived with symptoms longer before the cancer was discovered. Researchers emphasize that it’s important for both the public and healthcare professionals to know that this type of cancer can also affect younger people. This is particularly important since the chance of curing cancer increases with early detection.

The study also shows that mortality has increased among both younger and older patients up to ten years after cancer diagnosis.

This is remarkable, since patients are often considered cured after such a long time. Our results challenge that view and underscore the need for more research into why this is happening, as well as long-term follow-up and support for both young and older patients, says Cecilia Radkiewicz, researcher at the Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.

Lifestyle may be the cause

It’s unclear what actually lies behind the increase in colorectal cancer among young people, but researchers believe it doesn’t appear to be driven by traditional risk factors such as inflammatory bowel disease or heredity. Instead, the results suggest that lifestyle factors may be decisive.

Childhood obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and antibiotic use have been highlighted as contributing factors, although the underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear, says Radkiewicz.

Just a few puffs are enough – how quickly vaping damages the lungs

Published 21 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Researchers have for the first time been able to demonstrate a direct link between inhaled nicotine from e-cigarettes and inflammatory markers in the blood.
2 minute read

Just a few puffs of an e-cigarette, or vape, containing nicotine can trigger inflammation in the lungs, according to research from Uppsala University in Sweden.

The researchers, who received funding from the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, tested 22 healthy individuals on two different occasions. The participants then smoked e-cigarettes both with and without nicotine for half an hour each.

When the researchers analyzed the blood samples, they found that participants exposed to nicotine-containing e-cigarettes showed elevated levels of inflammatory markers in their blood. According to the researchers, this could mean that just a few inhalations are enough to trigger an inflammatory reaction in lung tissue.

The results are alarming, as they clearly show that e-cigarettes with nicotine are not a harmless alternative to cigarettes. We have long worked to spread scientifically-based knowledge about nicotine’s health effects, and this research strengthens our conviction that tobacco and new nicotine products should be treated equally under the law, says Kristina Sparreljung, Secretary General of the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, in a press release.

For the first time, researchers have been able to demonstrate a direct link between inhaled nicotine and specific inflammation markers in the blood that are connected to the lungs. The researchers believe the absorption rate is particularly concerning, as the body absorbs nicotine faster than with nicotine patches, for example.

Our results are in line with previous studies where nicotine from e-cigarettes has been shown to affect blood vessels by increasing levels of vascular damage markers in the blood. It’s remarkable that even single occasions can produce biological effects. In the long term, this could contribute to the development of both lung diseases and cardiovascular disease, says Fariborz Mobarrez, lecturer and researcher at the Department of Medical Sciences at Uppsala University.

Obesity the most common risk factor for heart attack among Swedes

Published 20 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Women who suffer heart attacks often have more risk factors and a worse prognosis than men.
2 minute read

Obesity has overtaken smoking as the primary cause of heart attack among young adults in Sweden, a new study shows.

In the study, which was published in European Heart Journal – Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, researchers followed 44,254 people aged 18–59 after they suffered their first heart attack. The study is a registry-based study and was conducted with support from the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation.

The results show that three out of four young adults who suffered a heart attack had at least one known risk factor – most commonly high blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, or obesity. Furthermore, the study shows that obesity has overtaken smoking as the most common risk factor in this age group. The reason is that the number of smokers has decreased, but at the same time the proportion suffering from obesity has increased markedly. For example, one in four suffered from obesity in 2006, and more than one in three in 2021.

It is concerning that the proportion of people with obesity has overtaken the proportion of smokers as the most common risk factor among young adults. But it also shows that we can do much to prevent heart attacks by finding and treating risk factors in time, says Moa Simonsson, researcher and senior physician in cardiology at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, in a press release.

Difference between men and women

Men run a greater risk of suffering a heart attack compared to women and are often affected earlier in life. At the same time, the study shows that women who suffer heart attacks often have more risk factors, but also that they have a worse prognosis after a heart attack.

It seems that women who have a heart attack need to have a heavier burden of risk factors than men to be affected. This shows that we need to understand more about women’s particular risks, such as complications during pregnancy, says Simonsson.

Doctor testifies about vaccine injuries in US Senate hearing

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 31 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The American anesthesiologist Dr. Robert Sullivan testified before the U.S. Senate in a hearing titled "Voices of the Vaccine Injured".
3 minute read

An anesthesiologist with 20 years of experience told US senators how he developed a life-threatening lung disease after covid-19 vaccination. Dr. Robert Sullivan was one of the witnesses in a Senate hearing on vaccine injuries held by the Senate Homeland Security Committee.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee organized a hearing on July 15 titled “Voices of the Vaccine Injured” where people who claim to have been injured by covid-19 vaccines were able to share their experiences. Dr. Robert Sullivan, a licensed physician and certified anesthesiologist with over 20 years of active practice in Maryland, was one of the key witnesses.

Dr. Sullivan described a dramatic change in his health condition after vaccination. The same month he received his first mRNA dose, he had been featured in the Wall Street Journal’s fitness column for his aerial circus performances.

I was strong, healthy, and thriving. Just three weeks after my second dose, I couldn’t go up a flight of stairs without gasping for air, Sullivan told the senators.

The doctor developed constant chest pain, heart arrhythmias and overwhelming fatigue. An echocardiogram later confirmed damage to his heart and lungs.

The diagnosis was pulmonary hypertension. I had damage and narrowing of the blood vessels in my lungs, restricting blood flow and straining the heart. This isn’t like regular high blood pressure.  Pulmonary hypertension is usually progressive and fatal even with treatment. There is no cure, Sullivan explained.

The system didn’t respond

Dr. Sullivan reported his injury to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), the US system for reporting vaccine adverse events. Despite VAERS collecting his medical records, he never heard from the US health authorities FDA or CDC.

I believed in the system. I believed I would be heard. When I wasn’t, I channeled that disbelief into collaborating with the British Medical Journal on a report about the system’s failures. What I learned is chilling. If you are harmed, you are on your own., Sullivan said.

He explained that most doctors he knows have never heard of VAERS, and even fewer understand that there are mandatory reporting requirements. Sullivan was never taught about VAERS during his medical education and stated that it still isn’t taught.

Research predicted the problems

During his own research, Dr. Sullivan discovered that a scientist from Georgetown University had predicted exactly his type of injury in the same month the vaccines began rolling out.

He warned that spike protein, exposure, whether from the virus or from the shot, could harm the blood vessels in the lungs and placenta, Sullivan recounted.

The doctor referenced studies showing that spike protein from the SARS-1 virus also caused vascular damage in animals, and that many hospitalized covid patients develop pulmonary hypertension.

Broad vaccination perspective despite personal injury

When Senator Johnson asked about doctors’ attitudes toward vaccines, Dr. Sullivan surprised by explaining that he is still “enthusiastic about vaccination” and that he sees covid injections as something entirely different.

I’m not vaccine injured. I’m injured by an mRNA therapeutic. I was very careful in my testimony to use the word shot, Sullivan clarified.

He explained that training for vaccines is now limited to memorizing the schedule, but that the hidden cost of injuries is not studied or taught.

Spike protein toxicity

Senator Johnson raised the question of spike protein toxicity and criticized that many symptoms are now attributed to “long covid” instead of potential vaccine side effects.

There are many ways to lose with this new MRI technology. There are problems with the nanoparticle. There is a separate set of problems with synthetic mRNA. It persists in some people 700 days and counting now, Dr. Sullivan responded.

He explained that when the body is instructed to manufacture a protein that is presented on the cell surface, it creates a precondition for autoimmune disorders, and that the spike protein itself is biologically active.

—  It was published in December 2020, although not widely known, that that was causing damage to placenta and to lung, Sullivan added.

Dr. Sullivan concluded his testimony with an appeal for recognition and transparent information for patients, emphasizing the importance of truly informed consent in all medical treatment.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.