Thursday, March 27, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Poland says no to joint EU army

The new cold war

Published 17 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Poland's Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski believes that a common European army will not become a reality.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyj and EU leader Ursula von der Leyen are two of several leaders who have recently called for the creation of a common European army.

However, Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski dismisses such a solution, stating that “it will not happen”.

– I think we should be careful with this term because different people understand different things. If you understand by it the unification of national armies, it will not happen, Sikorsk explained in an interview with Telewizja Polska at the weekend.

Poland’s foreign minister also dismissed the idea of an EU peacekeeping force in Ukraine after a possible future ceasefire.

This is not a consideration because Poland’s duty to NATO is to protect the eastern flank, i.e., its own territory, he said.

However, the minister is in favor of EU countries rearming their own armies and developing their defense capabilities. According to Sikorski, Poland has long been pushing for the EU to relax funding rules so that member states can more easily invest in defense without violating the set budget rules.

“A threat to the existence of NATO”

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday, Zelensky declared that a “European army” must be created and argued that “decades of the old relationship between Europe and America are ending” after US Vice President JD Vance harshly criticized European countries and their leaders.

However, the idea is not Zelensky’s, nor is it new in 2019, for example, French President Emmanuel Macron and former German Chancellor Angela Merkel argued that an EU army should be established and that Europe must start pursuing a policy of “strategic autonomy” from Washington.

Even Italian politicians have argued that the EU cannot have a credible foreign policy without a common military.

The idea of forming a pan-European army as an alternative to the US-led military pact began to circulate some 20 years ago an idea then US Defense Secretary William Cohen described as “a threat to the very existence of NATO”.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Swedish professor: Reasonable for future generations to pay for the rearmament

Sweden-NATO-relationship

Published today 14:18
– By Editorial Staff
Daniel Waldenström thinks it is right that taxes should be raised for future generations to finance today's build up.

Swedish leaders have decided to borrow €27.5 billion for a major military investment that Ulf Kristersson describes as the “biggest rearmament since the Cold War“.

Daniel Waldenström is a professor of economics, and he thinks it is perfectly reasonable that future generations of Swedes will have to pay for the current governments project.

The Moderate-led government has announced that Sweden will spend 3.5 percent of GDP on defense compared to the current 2.4 percent. To achieve this, they intend to borrow the equivalent of €4,600 per Swede of working age a total of €27.5 billion.

Waldenström, who works at the Institute for Business Research, does not think the sum is anything to argue about and points out that during the Second World War, Sweden went from spending 2% to 10% of GDP on defense in a single year.

He acknowledges, however, that the military effort will mean cuts in several areas.

– It means that we will have to reprioritize our spending. We will have to cut back on some things and give more priority to civilian and military preparedness and war capacity. This will mean reducing or eliminating some spending, otherwise we cannot afford it.

“Will take a bigger hit”

The fact that the huge investment is financed with borrowed money is not strange but fully justified, as long as you have a clear plan about what you need to borrow for.

– Only after we say, ‘this is how much money we will need for this expenditure’. Instead of starting by collecting money and putting it in a bag for unclear purposes and then risking that politicians will be able to ‘draw’ from this bag for lots of things that we had not intended. I would say that is a risk in such cases that we can avoid.

Since the money will be paid back with interest in the future, taxes will also have to be raised in the future, and Waldenström is clear that future generations of Swedes will be forced to finance the decisions made today.

– It’s clear that future generations will have to take a bigger hit than if we were to just go on this year’s budget. But it also seems reasonable that future generations should help finance reconstruction because it will also benefit them.

– It’s simply that they will have to pay a bit more tax as a result of this. They will have to pay taxes to finance our repayment of these loans, concludes the professor.

Swedish government borrows billions for biggest military buildup since Cold War

Sweden-NATO-relationship

Published yesterday 14:35
– By Editorial Staff
The leaders of the governing coalition parties during Wednesday's press conference.

The Moderate-led government and the Swedish Social Democratic Party have agreed to borrow about €4,600 per Swede of working age for Sweden’s military rearmament a total of €27.5 billion.

– This will be the biggest rearmament since the Cold War, declares Ulf Kristersson (M).

During a press conference, the leaders of the coalition parties stated that Sweden will spend 3.5% of GDP on the military by 2030 compared to 2.4% today.

To reach this goal, the Swedish Armed Forces will receive an additional SEK 300 billion (€27.5 billion) and the investment will be financed through loans.

It’s about a loan-financed defense investment from this year through 2030 until 2035 that could amount to a total of about SEK 300 billion, confirms Ulf Kristersson.

– A European NATO that reaches 3.5% will be much, much stronger than we are today, the Prime Minister further claims.

More money for Kiev

The money will be used, among other things, to buy military equipment for the Swedish army – but there is also a promise to further increase military aid to Ukraine.

A decision has already been taken to provide Kiev with weapons and other support worth €2.3 billion annually until 2026 but now the Swedish government wants to use next year’s allocation already this year and add another €1.85 billion.

– We need to do what we can here and now to further strengthen Ukraine’s defense capabilities, says Johan Pehrson (L), Minister of Education.

NATO currently requires member states to spend at least 2% of GDP on their defense but that requirement is expected to be raised already this summer to somewhere between 3% and 5%, according to analysts.

The background to this is that the Trump administration wants Europe to take greater financial responsibility for the costs of the military pact. The US has also announced its intention to reduce its military presence on the continent, while Russia is increasingly identified by EU leaders as an urgent military threat that Europe must be ready to fight.

Poland and Baltic States withdraw from anti-personnel mine ban treaty

The new cold war

Published 20 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Donald Tusk's Poland could be one of the first EU countries to leave the Ottawa Treaty.

The defense ministers of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia announce in a joint statement that they will withdraw from the international convention banning the use of anti-personnel mines.

They say that Russia is threatening their countries and that they will “use every necessary measure to defend our territory and freedom”.

The treaty entered into force in the late 1990s and has so far been signed by 164 states – excluding major military powers such as the US, China and Russia.

The background to the convention is that it is mainly civilians who are killed by mines and that many years after conflicts and wars are over, they remain in the ground and cause deaths, for example when children accidentally step on or kick them.

According to The Swedish Peace and Arbitration Society, 76% of the victims of anti-personnel mines are civilians and about half are children. Today, it is estimated that around 45 million unexploded landmines are still in place around the world, killing thousands of people every year.

More could leave

The four ministers “unanimously recommend withdrawing from the Ottawa Convention”, arguing that the security situation in NATO’s eastern flank “has fundamentally deteriorated” since the Convention was signed and is therefore no longer relevant.

Military threats to NATO member states bordering Russia and Belarus have significantly increased”, they say, adding that they want to give their respective defense forces “flexibility and freedom of choice of potential use of new weapon systems”.

With this decision, we are sending a clear message: Our countries are prepared and can use every necessary measure to defend our territory and freedom”, the ministers continue.

It is not only Poland and the Baltic States that may leave the Ottawa Treaty. Although all EU countries are currently covered by the convention, there are forces that believe it is high time to abandon it.

In Finland, a citizens’ initiative calling for the country to withdraw from the treaty quickly gathered 50,000 signatures, and the Finnish Defense Forces are currently investigating the issue, before the Minister of Defense is due to take a position on its conclusions.

French MEP wants to “take back” the Statue of Liberty

Donald Trump's USA

Published 18 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Raphael Glucksmann says Americans today “despise” the Statue of Liberty and what it stands for.

French-Jewish MEP Raphael Glucksmann wants France to “take back” the Statue of Liberty 140 years after it was donated to the US.

The reason is that, according to Glucksmann, Americans have “chosen to side with tyrants” and that the American people today allegedly “despise” the ideals that, according to the left-liberal politician, the statue represents.

On October 28, 1886, the Statue of Liberty was unveiled in New York Harbor, on the occasion of the centenary of the American Declaration of Independence. Designed by Frenchman Auguste Bartholdi, the statue was a gift from the French people to the Americans and has since become one of the world’s most famous tourist destinations.

However, Raphael Glucksmann, a member of the Socialist Group in the European Parliament, is now calling for the statue to be returned to France citing his disapproval of the political path taken by the Trump administration.

We’re going to say to the Americans who have chosen to side with the tyrants, to the Americans who fired researchers for demanding scientific freedom: ‘Give us back the Statue of Liberty’, the politician proclaimed at a party congress.

The “tyrants” are presumed to refer to Russia and its leadership in Moscow, and Glucksmann, a long-time supporter of Ukraine, campaigned last year to further increase French aid to Kiev.

– We gave it to you as a gift, but apparently you despise it. So it will be just fine here at home, the MEP continued during the party event.

“Welcoming” laid-off American scientists

Furthermore, Glucksmann argues that the Americans who are losing their jobs due to the Trump administration’s public sector cuts are instead very welcome to live and work in France.

– If you want to fire your best researchers, if you want to fire all the people who, through their freedom and their sense of innovation, their taste for doubt and research, have made your country the world’s leading power, then we’re going to welcome them.

However, any “return” of the 46-meter statue is highly unlikely. On social media, many users see Glucksmann’s statement as another example of how difficult it is for many European politicians to deal with the political shift that Trump’s presidency has brought to the US and the world.

Some observers also point to the fact that France, Germany and other European countries have acted as an extension of the United States in foreign policy for decades, and now that US priorities have changed, they no longer have a clear plan on how to deal with the Americans.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.