Monday, September 15, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

After the terrorist attack in Moscow – Putin calls for stricter migration laws

Published 7 April 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Putin says the purpose of the terrorist attack was to "divide" Russia.
1 minute read

Vladimir Putin calls for a new migration strategy after the bloody terrorist attack on a concert hall outside Moscow that killed at least 144 people.

Only people who “respect our traditions, language, culture and history” should be allowed to settle in the country, says the Russian president.

The terror attack, which also left 551 people injured, has shaken Russia and many voices have been raised in favor of improving the public security apparatus – but also of tightening immigration policies and laws on residence permits for migrants. This is because most of the suspected terrorists are Tajiks who have lived and worked in Russia.

So far, at least 12 people have been arrested for involvement in the attack claimed by the Islamic State terror group – although Russia has expressed suspicions that Ukraine was also involved in the terror attack.

According to Putin, the aim of the terrorist attack on the concert hall was to create “discord, xenophobia and Islamophobia in Russia” – and, according to Reuters, he also emphasised the need to change the migration system so that work permits cannot be issued to people with a lengthy criminal record.

– We need to deeply and radically update our approaches to migration policy,… The decisive principle should be that only those who respect our traditions, language, culture, and history can come to live and work in Russia.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

CDU wins in North Rhine-Westphalia – AfD triples its support

Published today 10:28
– By Editorial Staff
AfD party leader Alice Weidel regards the preliminary result as a major victory.
2 minute read

The CDU appears set to become the largest party in the state election in Germany’s most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia. But it is primarily the national-conservative Alternative for Germany that has reason to celebrate after tripling its voter support.

When polling stations closed on Sunday, initial projections showed that the Christian Democratic CDU, led by former BlackRock executive Friedrich Merz, received around 34 percent of the vote. The Social Democratic SPD came in second place with 22.5 percent.

However, the biggest change comes from Alternative for Germany (AfD). The party appears to have received 16.5 percent – a significant increase from 5.1 percent in the 2020 election.

Sunday’s election was the first local election since the political upheaval in German politics earlier this year, and for AfD the result represents another step in the party’s westward expansion.

The national-conservative party has made historic gains in recent years and become the second-largest political force at the national level. The voter base has traditionally been found in eastern Germany but is now also growing in the west – as Sunday’s results in North Rhine-Westphalia demonstrate.

Strict opinion laws

Despite AfD’s growing support in both elections and opinion polls, the party struggles to gain actual political influence. The other established parties have consistently refused to cooperate and formed various coalitions to keep AfD out of power.

Several German authorities have gone even further and argued that AfD should be completely banned and classified as unconstitutional.

Germany’s strict opinion laws make many immigration-critical and nationalist positions criminal acts. While several neighboring countries have considerably freer debate, German authorities often use 1930s history as an argument to silence political opposition.

AfD’s recent successes have, however, raised the question of whether German opinion laws and attempts to isolate AfD actually work – or whether they instead drive more dissatisfied German voters to the party.

Von der Leyen’s media plans spark anger: “Pure George Orwell’s 1984”

Totalitarianism

Published 12 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Swedish EU parliamentarian Dick Erixon from the Sweden Democrats is not impressed by von der Leyen's speech about the EU needing to "protect" establishment media.
3 minute read

Ursula von der Leyen presented plans in the European Parliament for a new media support program and increased EU funding for traditional establishment media.

Sweden Democrats’ EU parliamentarian Dick Erixon calls the EU Commission President’s speech “pure George Orwell’s 1984” and accuses von der Leyen of wanting to stifle freedom of expression.

In her speech to the European Parliament, the heavily criticized EU Commission President complained about how traditional establishment media are struggling for survival and spoke about rural areas where the local newspaper has become “a nostalgic memory” while warning that this has created “news deserts where disinformation thrives”.

As a solution, von der Leyen presented a “Media Resilience Programme” that will actively support what she and other EU power holders consider to be independent journalism and media literacy.

She also announced that the EU Commission proposes to “significantly boost funding for media” in the next EU budget, but only certain media will be able to access EU citizens’ tax money.

“Wants to protect legacy media”

Dick Erixon, the Sweden Democrats’ representative in the European Parliament, is among several who are directing very harsh criticism at the proposals.

“Deplorable speech by Ursula von der Leyen: Wants state authorities to protect legacy media from source criticism. It was a particularly divisive speech we heard in the European Parliament today. Ursula spoke about freedom but wants to stifle freedom of expression”, he states.

He is particularly critical of von der Leyen’s statement that the EU should “protect” traditional media.

“The EU will protect (yes, ‘protect’) legacy media in a new media program. Since paper newspapers are just a memory, ‘news deserts where disinformation thrives’ are created. Therefore, citizens need journalism they can ‘trust'”, Erixon writes sarcastically.

Warned about autocrats

In her speech, von der Leyen also claimed that independent media are under attack from “autocrats” who want to take control of them.

“The first step in an autocrat’s playbook is always to capture independent media. Because this enables backsliding and corruption to happen in the dark”, she proclaimed dramatically.

“A free press is the backbone of any democracy”, she then claimed and promised that the EU will “support Europe’s press to remain free”.

Dick Erixon points out, however, that von der Leyen and her allies hardly have any interest in a truly independent media landscape and that her rhetoric is rather about citizens blindly trusting what establishment media say and write – while forums that EU leaders don’t control should be made suspicious and censored.

“For Ursula, critical source examination of power holders and the establishment is of no value. ‘Trust traditional media’ was her message, while she believes that social media serves the purposes of darkness and corruption. It’s pure George Orwell’s 1984”, he says.

Wants to limit social media for children

Von der Leyen also wants to introduce restrictions on children’s use of social media. She accused the platforms of using “algorithms that prey on children’s vulnerabilities with the explicit purpose of creating addictions” and announced that an expert panel will develop proposals for EU restrictions before the end of the year.

“Our friends in Australia are pioneering a social media restriction. I am watching the implementation of their policy closely to see what next steps we can take here in Europe”, von der Leyen said.

Von der Leyen gave no further details in her speech about how the media support program will work, what criteria will be used to distribute support, or how large a budget is planned for the program. She also did not specify who will define what counts as “disinformation” or “independent media”.

The EU Commission has also proposed using private capital to support certain media, without further explaining how this will work.

Six AfD politicians dead in short time – raises questions ahead of German election

Published 4 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
German police claim there is nothing to suggest that any of the deceased AfD politicians were victims of crimes.
2 minute read

Six politicians from the national-conservative party Alternative for Germany (AfD) have died within the span of a few weeks in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The deaths occurred just weeks before the regional election on September 14.

Four candidates and two substitutes from AfD reportedly died during an extremely short time period, which has sparked speculation within the party. The deceased are Ralph Lange, 66, Wolfgang Klinger, 71, Stefan Berendes, 59, and Wolfgang Seitz, 59, as well as two substitutes who have not yet been named.

German police claim they are investigating all deaths, but that no crime is suspected at present. Authorities state that two of the deaths were due to natural causes and information about other causes of death has not been released out of consideration for the relatives.

AfD’s deputy leader in North Rhine-Westphalia, Kay Gottschalk, spoke out on Tuesday about the rumors circulating within the party that the politicians had been murdered or otherwise died unnaturally.

— What I have in front of me – but that’s just partial information – that doesn’t back up these suspicions at the moment, Gottschalk told Politico’s Berlin Playbook Podcast.

He emphasized that the party wants the cases investigated “without immediately getting into conspiracy-theory territory” and pointed out the importance of showing consideration for the affected families.

“Almost statistically impossible”

AfD party leader Alice Weidel has also drawn attention in connection with sharing a post from economist Stefan Homburg, who argued that the number of deaths was “almost statistically impossible”.

 

Practical problems have also arisen following the deaths – ballot papers have had to be reprinted several times and some early votes have been declared invalid.

AfD has made significant progress in North Rhine-Westphalia since the last state election in 2022. According to opinion polls, the party has increased from 5.4 percent to nearly 17 percent of voter support.

North Rhine-Westphalia is Germany’s most populous state with 18 million inhabitants. In total, around 20,000 candidates are running in the September 14 election.

Despite the polling successes, AfD is still expected to be shut out from influence when other established parties join together to stop the EU- and immigration-critical party.

Former German vice chancellor: The era of establishment parties may soon be over

Published 29 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
German politician Robert Habeck believes that the traditional "system parties" in Germany will continue to lose voters going forward and slowly collapse.
3 minute read

Germany’s former Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck and co-leader of the Green Party explicitly warns of the impending collapse of establishment parties in Germany. He also states that he cannot see any realistic solutions within the political system he himself helped build.

Habeck, who also has a background as finance minister, announces that he is leaving active politics with a grim prognosis for the country’s established political parties. In an interview with German newspaper Taz, he warns that the dominance of established parties is approaching its end.

— If the legislative period continues as it has so far, CDU/CSU and SPD will not have their own majority after the next Bundestag election. More likely is that they lose one to two percentage points per year. Then it’s over for the people’s parties, and then forever.

He paints a picture of parties in free fall where “CDU/CSU is not fighting for 30 percent, but to get over 20. And SPD is not fighting to catch up with CDU/CSU, but to maintain ten percent”.

Habeck, who was previously co-leader of the Green Party, will submit his Bundestag mandate next week, and he is ruthless in his criticism of the current government.

— That this government represents any consensus in Germany, they don’t even believe that themselves, he argues.

— Politically desirable democratic alternatives are not on offer. A new approach must be found. And I can’t find that within the confines of the system I helped build over the last 20 years, he admits.

Will teach in Sweden

The so-called traffic light coalition – consisting of the Greens, the social democratic SPD, and the liberal FDP – collapsed in November 2024 after the parties could not agree on how to handle a budget deficit of several billion euros for 2025.

Habeck himself belongs to the circle that has been identified as personally responsible for Germany’s prolonged economic decline. In Monday’s interview, the politician explains that he needs distance and “moves forward by going abroad next year”.

— I need to distance myself from the overly restrictive corset of Berlin’s political system.

The politician reveals that he will research and teach at institutions in Denmark, Sweden, and the USA. He simultaneously denies that the move would mean he is withdrawing from political debate.

Merz wants to abolish the welfare state

In the new election on February 23, his party received about 12 percent of the votes, while SPD ended up at 16.5 percent – their worst result since World War II. The FDP barely cleared the four percent threshold.

Under the new government, economic problems have continued. Federal Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Saturday that Germany finds itself in a deep structural crisis and declared that the country will no longer be able to afford to finance the current welfare system.

Critics and opposition argue that Germany’s establishment parties have actively driven the country into the ground through, among other things, costly political experiments such as the mass immigration of millions of people from the Third World and unreasonably prioritizing the military project in Ukraine over citizens’ welfare.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.