Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Foreign aid in jeopardy as Swedish banks shut down associations’ accounts

The crisis of confidence in banks

Published 8 June 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Left: Swedbank. Right: Children in the Middle East.

On January 1, 2023, the new anti-money laundering legislation came into force with the purported aim of combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

In practice, however, the result has been that a number of non-profit associations and organizations engaged in aid activities abroad have had their accounts closed by banks due to lack of customer knowledge – and fewer children and other vulnerable people in poor countries are getting the help they need.

The investigative journalism project Blank Spot has spoken to Said Agai, chairman of the Swedish-Kurdish association Support for Kurdish Children, and after 25 years as a customer, he was suddenly informed that Swedbank was closing the association’s account without further explanation or justification – and that they have one month to find a new bank.

We have tried to explain to Swedbank how we use the money that comes to us and what we do with it. There are receipts and records for everything, he explains.

The association is dedicated to supporting mainly orphans in Iranian Kurdistan by financing medicine, food, schooling and other necessities – due to the bank’s actions, it will now be difficult to continue. It is unclear whether the vulnerable in the area will be able to find help elsewhere.

There is almost no one who can help them and we have the opportunity. Swedbank is now taking that opportunity away from us, Agai says.

He also points out that they have not been given any opportunity to respond to the bank’s ban and he suspects that the action has to do with Sweden’s new terrorism legislation – a terrorism legislation that is seen by many as a concession to Turkey to approve a Swedish NATO application.

– It’s hard to say why they are closing our account when we don’t know the charges. Is it because of what is happening with the new terrorism legislation and NATO?

Swedbank refuses to explain

When Blank Spot calls Swedbank to find out whether the Kurdish association has been reported to the police for money laundering or terrorist financing, we are told that the closure of a person’s or association’s account can be done even if there is no concrete suspicion of crime or police report, and that individual cases cannot be commented on.

Said Agai and Support for Kurdish Children are not the only ones who have recently been affected by arbitrary bank closures. According to Blank Spot, between 20 and 30 Swedish-Kurdish associations and organizations have suffered the same fate after carrying out foreign transactions.

“Around half of them have had their banking arrangements terminated and the rest have been threatened with closure.”

Nuri Kino, president of the human rights and aid organization A Demand For Action, which works in crisis and war-affected countries, also confirms that a number of smaller associations and organizations have contacted him to say that they can no longer contribute to fundraising and aid work – because the bank has closed their accounts.

Smaller actors have already been affected. For example, those who collected money for the victims of the war in Ukraine and for earthquake victims in Syria and Turkey. They contact us and say that they cannot contribute in the future because their accounts have been closed.

He stresses that there is a very real concern that bank accounts can no longer be relied upon for fundraising during crises and emergencies – something that could be devastating to the relief effort.

– On March 2, 2022, we arrived at the border with Ukraine. Tens of thousands of people, mostly children and women, were fleeing in panic. The vast majority had only the clothes they were wearing as luggage. If Swedish civil society, i.e. smaller Swedish associations, could not act quickly and send supplies and pay for buses to take refugees to Sweden, it would have been devastating for Ukrainian refugees, he says.

A threat to democracy

Giva Sverige (“To Give Sweden”) which is the branch organization for the Swedish fundraising organizations, believes that it is a democratic problem that banks, on very loose and arbitrary grounds, deny or close down the accounts of associations in order to avoid financial sanctions themselves.

When banks do not dare or want to accept individual associations as customers because they feel they do not have sufficient information or transparency, it limits the opportunities for citizens to get involved in voluntary associations. This is a democratic problem, but it also increases the risks if associations and organizations have to manage their finances outside the banking system, says Secretary General Charlotte Rydh.

– Without a bank account and other banking services such as digital payments, it is difficult, if not impossible, for most associations and organizations to operate. It is not possible to manage any financial activity for the association that receives membership fees, donations, payments for activities or pay rents and other purchases, she adds.

As a private individual, you are currently entitled to an account with basic payment services. However, companies, organizations or associations do not have this right. Instead, it is the banks themselves who decide who can be their customers. There is no well-functioning protection mechanism to ensure that banks do not abuse their power and, for political or other arbitrary reasons, deny accounts and banking services to actors they dislike.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

160 000 Swedes lost their bank accounts in three years

The crisis of confidence in banks

Published 25 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Anyone who is evicted by the bank currently has very little chance of getting redress.

The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (Finansinspektionen) found in a survey that almost 160,000 Swedes had their bank accounts closed between 2020 and 2022.

In 2020, banks in Sweden closed 45,000 accounts on their own initiative, followed by 54,000 the following year and as many as 60,000 bank accounts in 2022 a 33% increase in just two years.

No statistics are available for 2023 and 2024 – so it is not yet clear whether bank account closures in Sweden have continued to increase since then.

The purpose of Finansinspektionen’s survey is described as seeing how the banks handle their statutory obligation to offer payment accounts to consumers, and it is a bleak picture that is presented:

The number of consumers having their payment accounts closed has increased by 30% in recent years. At the same time, banks continue to refuse consumers to open accounts at the same rate as before. Banks’ most common reason for refusing and closing accounts is lack of customer awareness”, it notes.

Alternative solutions

FI notes that the negative consequences for an individual who is refused an account or thrown out of the bank are very high, and that more needs to be done to improve their handling.

Although banks are certainly obliged to counteract suspected money laundering and terrorist financing, FI believes that there are often better alternatives than completely excluding people from the bank.

In doubtful cases, it suggests, for example, that monitoring of the customer’s transactions should be intensified or that appropriate limits should be introduced.

FI believes that banks need to work purposefully to lower the thresholds for obtaining an account that can at least be used for certain everyday needs”, it writes.

“Serious consequences”

The report also looked at how banks handle offers of payment accounts to businesses. Although there is no legal obligation to offer companies bank accounts in the same way as private individuals, FI emphasizes that they should not be denied accounts with the banks lightly either.

At the same time, companies’ access to financial services is also of great practical importance. Being denied a payment account often has consequences for the individual company that can be very serious”, it states.

When banks close their customers’ accounts, they usually claim that they have not been able to achieve “adequate customer due diligence” and that customers’ answers to various questions and wording are deemed “inadequate”.

However, evicted consumers have a different view and say that it is very difficult to have a constructive dialog with the bank, or to have any dialog at all.

Difficult for those affected

FI also notes that “consumers who, for various reasons, have unusual transaction patterns or make transactions that are deemed to involve a higher risk appear to have their payment accounts terminated to a greater extent than before”. This could include, for example, repeatedly withdrawing or depositing cash, or trading cryptocurrencies.

It also shows that only a fifth of Swedes who request a review of the bank’s decision are ultimately successful and that it is very difficult to even get a decision from the bank that can be reviewed.

Consumers are often asked to complete their applications, which means that an application is not considered complete. This means that the consumer does not receive a rejection or information on where to lodge a complaint. In practice, this makes it difficult for consumers to submit an application and they cannot, within the framework of a completed application, question whether the requested supplements are relevant or not”, FI writes.

In conclusion, the administrative authority states that “there is still a need to strengthen consumer protection” and states that it “will continue to work to improve access to payment accounts”.

Swedish restaurateur suspended from bank after ten years – no explanation given

The crisis of confidence in banks

Published 11 December 2024
– By Editorial Staff
“It's so sick that you can be treated this badly as an entrepreneur in Sweden”, says Linda to The Nordic Times.

After almost ten years as a customer of SEB, one of Sweden’s largest banks, the bank suddenly closed Linda’s three business accounts. Despite several emails and attempts at telephone contact, Linda has received no explanation from the bank as to why they have decided to close her accounts.

It was in 2014 that Linda bought Titans Sportbar in Norrköping together with her former husband. The purchase was made through their joint holding company, which was set up just before the purchase.

The business account for the sports bar was with the bank, SEB, and Linda therefore needed to go there and arrange contracts and various other things required for a business purchase.

SEB said that Linda needed to create a private account with them for everything to go through. She had both a house loan and the holding company in another major bank, but she still created a private account with SEB.

Customer knowledge

In 2015, they bought the Stopet nightclub. This time, Linda and her ex-husband needed to create a new business account for the nightclub, so she asked SEB if it was possible to open another business account with them. It went well and since then the businesses have been running smoothly. Linda has submitted all the KYC questions on time and has never had any loans or credits with SEB. Nor has she received or sent money abroad, something that Swedish banks have become increasingly reluctant to allow.

Last year, Linda and her current husband found a new premises in Norrköping that they liked and decided to start a third business, Lindas kula. Again, Linda applied for a business account with SEB and was approved in May 2024. At the same time, she decided to transfer the holding company to SEB, so that most of it would be gathered at the same bank, and last summer they opened the doors to Lindas Kula.

Everything went well for Linda and the three restaurants in Norrköping. In the fall, she received new questions about customer knowledge, where she as an entrepreneur must also send in account transactions, annual reports and questions about cash withdrawals. Everything was sent in as usual, the only thing that couldn’t be sent in was an annual report for Linda’s Kula, which had only been open for a few months.

In September this year, Linda received a message from SEB stating that they did not “understand” the answers received and that they would therefore close all commitments, i.e. all company accounts and also the holding company. She was asked to transfer the funds immediately to an account outside SEB. No further explanation was given at all. Linda was confused by the message and responded immediately.

I have emailed in documentation on what you asked for? Or is there something you are missing?” she wrote in reply to the message.

No further explanation was given at all

No reply was received from the bank. Linda tried calling and emailing again, but no one answered.

Right to know why

Linda got in touch with the local branch manager of SEB in Norrköping, who did reply to her. The branch manager wrote that Linda of course had the right to know why her business accounts would suddenly be terminated after almost ten years as a customer, and the manager would contact the responsible department. However, despite numerous calls, the branch manager was unable to reach anyone in charge. As local bank branches do not own these issues, she was told that it was difficult for the branch manager to do more.

Linda also managed to get in touch by email with an employee at the local SEB office, who worked specifically with corporate issues, but she was not as helpful as the branch manager and only referred to the central support. When Linda called the phone number she was given, she was transferred to the wrong department.

The bank will send out letters

The manager also told Linda that when accounts are closed, SEB should send out three letters by post before the accounts are closed, but Linda has not received a single letter home. The bank is also supposed to contact the customer if they do not receive the right answer, which has not happened either.

Despite repeated attempts, Linda has not yet received a reply and her accounts were closed without any feedback from the bank. As a result of the closure of her business accounts, Linda was no longer able to accept card payments at her restaurants and could only accept cash.

I have lost a lot of money in these weeks, for no reason whatsoever, Linda tells The Nordic Times. Photo: Private

Although it is usually extremely difficult for entrepreneurs to find a new bank after going through what Linda has been through, against all odds she has managed to find a new bank and saved her business, but she is still waiting for an explanation from SEB. A complaint has been made to the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority and the Swedish Consumer Agency.

It’s so sick that you can be treated this badly as an entrepreneur in Sweden, Linda concludes.

The crisis of confidence in banks

Linda’s experience is far from unique and has become symptomatic of how Swedish banks treat their customers, with vague references to “lack of customer knowledge” and by hiding behind their “customer knowledge department” without anyone being held accountable in practice. In its article series The crisis of confidence in banks, The Nordic Times documents how banks have devastated businesses and left individuals in desperate financial situations.

Major bank under investigation for money laundering

The crisis of confidence in banks

Published 16 April 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Morgan Stanley has 600 offices in 33 countries.

US banking giant Morgan Stanley is now under investigation by several federal regulators.

This time, its wealth management division is under scrutiny. Authorities say the bank neither knows nor seems to care where its wealthy clients’ money comes from.

In February, the investment bank was implicated in a money-laundering scandal in Venezuela and was investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which oversees securities trading.

Now, the SEC and several other U.S. agencies have begun investigating Morgan Stanley’s wealth management division, and the Federal Reserve has also become involved, the Wall Street Journal reports.

They say the bank does not know enough about where its wealthy clients’ money comes from – and does not appear to be doing much to control it.

The authorities point out that the investment bank has not mapped the financial activities and histories of its clients, including international clients who are considered to be involved in various forms of suspicious or illegal activities.

Relies on revenues

At the same time, it is emphasized that the bank is dependent on the high revenues of its wealth management department and has been since the financial crisis of 2008 – this is also believed to be the reason why it did not bother to sufficiently check where the money actually comes from.

“The division generates stable revenue streams that Morgan Stanley relies on to smooth out downturns in investment, banking and trading”, Swedish business magazine Dagens PS points out.

Morgan Stanley has previously stated that it intends to cooperate fully with the US authorities in all cases related to money laundering.

Bank branch closures threaten rural Sweden

The crisis of confidence in banks

Published 1 March 2024
– By Editorial Staff
38 of the country's 290 municipalities now have no bank branches at all.

38 municipalities in Sweden have no bank branches at all. Johan Grip, chief economist at Företagarna, says this is a “worrying development” that particularly affects small businesses.

Over the past 15 years, banks have closed 1,069 branches in Sweden, leaving 918, mainly in rural areas, and 38 of the country’s 290 municipalities have no bank branches at all, according to a survey by Bonnier-owned business newspaper Dagens Industri. This represents 13 percent of all municipalities and is growing, affecting many small businesses in rural areas.

– This is a very worrying development that is continuing. Wherever I travel in Sweden, small business owners testify to a sense of despondency, where closed offices and reduced interest from banks affect their business, Johan Grip, who is responsible for analyzing socio-economic issues important to businesses and entrepreneurship at the business organization Företagarna, told the newspaper.

“Maximizing profits”

Grip says there are several consequences for small businesses when the nearest bank branch is far away, including making it more difficult to get a bank loan.

– All lending is based on relationships and an understanding of local conditions, Grip says. That has been lost in many places.

Banks say this is due to increased digitalization and the fact that it allows them to provide the same service without being physically present. But Grip points out that it is more about increasing profits for the banks, and calls their actions “crass”.

– It would be more flattering if the banks could say that their actions are about maximizing profits. Instead, they want to see themselves as social institutions, which is a bit ridiculous, he says.

Share via

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.

Send this to a friend