Saturday, August 16, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Foreign investors becoming “nervous Nellies”: Carlyle Thayer on Vietnam’s deepening political turmoil

In an exclusive interview with TNT, Emeritus Professor Carlyle Thayer of The University of New South Wales discussed Vietnam's anti-corruption efforts, their effects on domestic politics, economy, foreign investment potential, and the nation's global image.

Published 1 May 2024
– By Sukanya Saha
Left: Former President Võ Văn Thưởng during a visit to Japan. Right: Current President Võ Thị Ánh Xuân at the Presidential Palace in Hanoi.
7 minute read

Vietnam’s previously stable one-party Communist regime has been known for its consistency. However, President Võ Văn Thưởng’s sudden resignation on March 20, merely a year into his tenure, making him the shortest-serving president in the nation’s Communist history, indicates a growing tumult in Hanoi’s political landscape.

For weeks, several experts had been forecasting his downfall. Now, Thưởng has joined the ranks as the second president to step down within the span of two years amid a sweeping anti-corruption campaign that has ousted numerous high-ranking politicians in the Southeast Asian country.

During an interview exclusively with The Nordic Times, Carlyle Thayer, Emeritus Professor of Politics at The University of New South Wales, discussed Vietnam’s anti-corruption drive, its impact on internal politics, economic outlook, the potential for foreign investment, and the country’s image on the global stage.

Foreign investors becoming ‘nervous Nellies’

Vietnam’s political instability coincides with a period of heightened foreign investment, fuelled by a global trend among manufacturers seeking to reduce reliance on China amid increasing tensions between Washington and Beijing. Investors are growing increasingly anxious as the anti-corruption campaign extends to private enterprises, causing delays and uncertainties in government approvals for projects and licenses. Officials are hesitant to grant approvals due to concerns about potential corruption investigations.

Deliberating on whether Vietnam’s political instability would concern its foreign investors, Thayer said, “Beijing’s economy is in the doldrums and Vietnam heavily relies on the Chinese market. Vietnam wants science and technology to be the driver.

“They want innovation, clean energy transition, protected supply chains, help the semiconductor industry, and more. They want to modernise. So, to do that, they are going to have to encourage investment and make decisions. They already have had at least 50 US businesses visit the largest US trade mission.

“But investors are understandably apprehensive about potential shifts in leadership. And the closer you get to a party congress, you see a slowdown in the process of decision-making and approvals. However, it will be up to Prime Minister Phạm Minh Chính and his cabinet to drive progress.

“Vietnam, being risk-averse, will avoid unnerving investors who might hastily withdraw their support. The last thing they want the investors to become is nervous Nellies and scare the horses. They need foreign investment, including from China. It is crucial for Vietnam’s economic stability and they are not trying to move to the West only.

“Therefore, Vietnam has a pragmatic approach that involves constant self-reflection to drive economic progress and maintain political stability. It recently expressed interest in establishing trade offices in five major Chinese cities and aims to collaborate with India, particularly in high-tech sectors.”

Impact on domestic politics

On March 20, the Vietnamese Communist Party acknowledged the resignation of President Võ Văn Thưởng, citing “shortcomings”, according to a government statement. The statement specified that Thưởng, who was widely perceived as having a close relationship with the General Secretary of the Communist Party, Nguyễn Phú, Vietnam’s most influential figure and the main architect of the anti-corruption drive, had breached party regulations, and these “shortcomings” had led to adverse public perceptions, tarnishing the reputation of both the party and the State, as well as his own personal standing.

Discussing how Thưởng’s sudden resignation could impact Vietnam’s domestic politics and its image on the global stage, the professor opined, “Well, Thưởng has resigned and there are 20 months left in his term of office, actually a bit more, till May of 2026. So, at the moment, Vietnam has appointed Vice President Võ Thị Ánh Xuân to replace him. But she is not a member of the so-called four pillars of the Vietnamese leadership and one has to be a permanent member of the political bureau.

“So, the Central Committee must decide who will fill the president’s term. Earlier, the party secretary general assumed the presidency after a president’s death but relinquished it upon the term’s end. But it’s unlikely the current Secretary General (Nguyễn Phú Trọng) will do the same due to age and health concerns.

“Therefore, they have two options: Appointing a caretaker or someone to serve the term without major shifts in foreign or economic policy. But despite the transition period, I expect Vietnamese politics to remain stable, with leadership changes every five years, with a significant turnover, organised by age groups and regional representation.

“Of course, navigating their internal procedures can be cumbersome. Moreover, regardless of their actions, the outgoing leadership will review candidates. But once we get this interim decision made, it’s a steady state.”

Selection of future leaders

Transitioning power is a complex task in any nation, and Vietnam is no different. Following the conclusion of the 13th Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam, a new leadership team was selected to guide the country for the next five years. However, rather than rejuvenating national leadership to confront looming strategic, human security, and economic challenges, the party failed to deliver on its pledge for a generational change with several high-profile dismisses and prosecutions within the party.

Highlighting why there has been no significant change in the party’s internal dynamics, particularly regarding the selection of future leaders, Thayer explained, “With around 180 full voting members alongside alternatives, vacancies still exist within the central committee, primarily due to retirements. Vietnam systematically appoints people by age groups. It’s like an escalator. You have under 50, 50 to 60, 60 to 65.

“So, every five years, a new group, comprising provincial representatives, military, public security, and party officials, ascends to form the core of leadership, although gender representation remains low and there is only 10-14 per cent of women. Nevertheless, apart from occasional exceptions, structural composition, and sectoral representation ensure stability, as we have seen in regular party congresses since 1976. Therefore, the structural makeup and sectoral representation are ingrained, like DNA.”

He further suggested that Vietnam’s default stance leans heavily towards stability. Therefore, there are rarely any radical shifts, as the provinces, although under the same party umbrella, function independently. This setup provides a stabilising effect on the overall system. Since the reunification in 1976, party congresses have occurred regularly every five years.

“I’ve conducted analyses on turnover by age group and sector that show a remarkable level of stability. While there may be some fluctuations, the system’s foundation remains robust,” he added.

Who will be Thưởng’s successor?

The President’s role is largely ceremonial but ranks among the top four political positions in Vietnam. Recent shifts in leadership within the single-party system have all been associated with the extensive “blazing furnace” antigraft campaign, aimed at eradicating pervasive corruption but also suspected of being used for internal political struggles.

When former President Nguyễn Xuân Phúc resigned last year following allegations of “violations and wrongdoing” by officials under his jurisdiction, it took lawmakers a month and a half to appoint Thưởng as his successor. Therefore, the upcoming elections for a new president in Vietnam carry significant implications for the country’s political stability.

Underscoring the importance of the forthcoming elections in the Southeast Asian nation, the professor stated, “To host a head of state or government, you need a president who sits at the top political body, granting some authority but not independent policymaking power. The president essentially acts as the perfect salesman for what’s already been agreed collectively.

“Therefore, Vietnam must promptly fill this role to engage in meetings and summits in the region effectively as it significantly elevated its partnerships last year, aligning with the US, Japan, and Australia as comprehensive strategic partners, followed by South Korea the year before. This places them alongside China, Russia, and India, long-standing traditional allies and partners of Vietnam.”

Speaking of the Communist Party’s criteria for selecting Thưởng’s successor, Thayer said, “It will heavily influence Vietnam’s trajectory leading up to the 2026 National Congress. Typically, the Secretary General oversees the nomination process for a successor, by conducting straw polls to gauge support within the central committee. And now this process has been expedited due to Thưởng’s resignation, likely resulting in a smooth transition to the 14th Congress in early 2026.”

Is Vietnam losing its ‘China plus one’ tag?

Vietnam’s proactive approach in encouraging both Chinese and international companies to relocate operations to its territory and diversify their investments has played a significant role in its successful implementation of the “China plus one” strategy.

However, some experts feel that the government must now establish a clear and transparent legal framework to sustain its endeavours in combating corruption across both public and private domains. Otherwise, the lustre that the Southeast Asian nation has gained as being “China’s plus one” may fade away before long.

Mulling over the possibility of Vietnam losing its “China Plus One” status, Thayer remarked, “Well, the whole ‘China Plus One’ concept hinges on whether Donald Trump comes back after the November elections (in the US). It refers to businesses, both foreign and Chinese, moving some operations to Vietnam to avoid potential US sanctions or tariffs on Chinese goods. But it’s a tricky situation.

“But despite these challenges, I don’t think it could lose its ‘China plus one’ status. In fact, Vietnam’s status as a non-market economy could change soon, potentially leading to more favourable trade terms with the US.”

Sukanya Saha is a contributing editor at The Nordic Times. Based in New Delhi, she is an accomplished journalist who has previously worked with several major Indian media outlets such as NDTV, India Today, IANS, and Jagran English. Currently, she is associated with Hindustan Times. In 2022, she topped the BRICS International Journalism Programme from India. Committed to understanding the complex dynamics that shape our world, Sukanya's passions range from world politics to science and space exploration.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

When did dissenting views become a threat to the nation?

The threat to freedom of speech

When a British nationalist is detained for over 24 hours and deported – without criminal charges – it says more about Sweden than about him. We like to talk about freedom of speech - but those who don't share the establishment's values are not welcome in Sweden.

Published 5 August 2025
– By Jenny Piper
To visit Ulf Kristersson's Sweden, it's not enough to have the right papers and documents - you must also have the "right" opinions.
2 minute read

I read in the media that British nationalist Mark Collett, labeled as a neo-Nazi by mass media and the Swedish anti-extremist organization Expo, was reportedly stopped at Stockholm’s Arlanda Airport on Friday and denied entry to the country, despite there being no criminal suspicion.

Collett, who leads the British nationalist organization “Patriotic Alternative”, is described in media as a leading figure within far-right circles in Britain and was invited as a speaker to “Det fria Sveriges” (Free Sweden’s) summer festival in Töreboda, a town in central Sweden. However, Swedish police denied Collett entry to Sweden, and on his Telegram channel, Collett writes that he was told he posed a threat to public order, society’s structure, and the values on which Sweden and Europe are built.

According to his own account, he was detained at the airport for over 25 hours without access to either his luggage or passport, and without criminal suspicion or trial.

I had no idea who this person was, but after this macabre action by Swedish border police, I watched a British documentary about him and can only conclude that Sweden, as usual, overreacts and uses double standards when making decisions.

Collett and his party are nationalists who want their own people to be prioritized in society over immigrants, a development that has grown and escalated in pace with irresponsible migration policy, which in the long run affects their own citizens, who must pay the bill and step aside. Much like the development in Sweden, as well as other parts of Europe, where conservative/right-nationalist parties are growing as a consequence of mass migration to the EU and the accompanying increased crime and worsened conditions for their own people.

One doesn’t have to agree with this, but Mark Collett has the right to hold this opinion and run a political party with these values. This is not grounds for denying him entry to Sweden. And it also rhymes very poorly with the fact that we don’t stop either “returning” ISIS terrorists at the border or, for that matter, so-called Islamist hate preachers who regularly travel in and out of the country, to give some examples.

Moreover, we in Sweden are very good at beating our chests when it comes to freedom of speech and pointing fingers at other countries that engage in opinion suppression/opinion persecution, but apparently we are no better ourselves.

This is so absurd that words fail me. That a person who has committed no wrong should be denied entry to the country based on his values not being sufficiently politically correct.

Shameful, Sweden!

 

Jenny Piper

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

Mandatory work for asylum seekers should be introduced across the EU

In Burgenland, Austria, asylum seekers are required to work – a system that Sweden and the rest of the EU should adopt. Unfortunately, Swedish politicians have demonstrated for decades that the wellbeing of the population and the country rarely tops their agenda.

Published 3 July 2025
– By Jenny Piper
In Sweden, asylum policy has long been characterized by boundless permissiveness and generosity in its approach to immigration.
3 minute read

An interesting model has been introduced in the state of Burgenland, Austria. This week, a system known as the “Burgenland Model” was implemented, requiring asylum seekers to work for their host municipalities. The system aims to place people where extra help is needed most. Those who repeatedly refuse to work without valid reason risk having their social benefits reduced to an absolute minimum.

State Council Member Daniela Winkler, from the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ), explained in a speech last week that migration must be both economically and socially sustainable:

– The measures are intended to reflect fairness towards the population. When asylum seekers become engaged contributors to society, prejudices disappear and integration becomes a tangible experience. The structured daily routine provides asylum seekers with stability and purpose during a period of uncertainty. This isn’t about symbolic employment, but rather about real, everyday tasks.

According to a statement on the SPÖ’s website, the work includes landscape and winter maintenance, cleaning, delivery services, and basic tasks in nursing homes and libraries. Work in care services is limited to 20 hours per week, while other community services can extend to 30 hours. Compensation is set at 1.60 euros per hour.

Asylum seekers who refuse to participate without valid reason will have their financial benefits cut. However, access to basic accommodation, food, and healthcare remains guaranteed.

For example, those who refuse to perform mandatory tasks may lose their right to state-provided housing and instead be offered only a “sleeping place”.

The state of Carinthia is also reportedly working to introduce a similar system where participation in community service work will become mandatory for asylum seekers.

This could serve as a model for the entire EU – and particularly relevant for a country like Sweden, where generosity has long characterized migration policy without clear requirements for reciprocity. The problem is that it’s likely at least ten years too late. In Sweden, it would probably take several years of investigations before similar legislation could even be proposed – if it were politically possible at all. It’s still nearly taboo to speak about fairness towards the native population when it comes to migration and integration policy.

An interesting reflection in this context is that migration flows are practically never directed towards Asia – despite low birth rates – because many countries in the region, such as Japan and South Korea, simply don’t admit asylum seekers. They don’t have extensive systems for benefits and allowances similar to those that EU countries (with the exception of Hungary) have offered for decades.

Have you, by the way, noticed how the Swedish parliamentary parties have changed their rhetoric as the election approaches? The Swedish Prime Minister emphasizes in speech after speech the government’s successes and stresses how Sweden “is on the right path”. It’s difficult to understand how he manages to keep a straight face – but the salary for telling people the exact opposite of the truth is certainly good. Unfortunately, it often resonates with people who have too short a memory.

Next summer, all eight parliamentary parties in Sweden will be at the starting blocks for the election campaign. I suspect that the majority of voters – again – will cast their votes for these parties, despite history repeatedly showing that they don’t prioritize their own population. The illusion that they will this time focus on Swedish citizens’ best interests unfortunately seems to run deep.

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

A war without end – financed by you

Peace is not a goal – it's a threat to business. European taxpayers are forced to feed the military-industrial complex, while war profiteers convert blood into money.

Published 27 June 2025
– By Jenny Piper
Through decisions made by those in power, Swedish taxpayers will continue to finance the war in Ukraine.
2 minute read

The Washington Post reported yesterday, citing a high-ranking source within the Ukrainian presidential office, that Ukraine’s economy is teetering on the brink of collapse – despite Western support.

A positive economic impact, previously predicted for mid-2025 based on a ceasefire, is no longer being considered. Instead, efforts are focused on keeping the country afloat.

The fact that the Ukrainian economy hasn’t completely collapsed yet is solely due to extensive Western support. According to anonymous officials and analysts interviewed by the newspaper, there is a possibility that such support will not be sufficient for further development.

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, together with the leaders of Denmark, Finland, and Norway, has promised continued support for their top priority – Ukraine. With the help of our tax money, they can likely keep the country afloat through the end of the year, allowing the corrupt regime in Kiev to drain the last of our resources.

Everything is being done to prevent the war from ending, and with substantial help from both mass media and military officials, they ensure the population stays on board. A recent example is Swedish Supreme Commander Michael Claesson’s statement to Dagens Industri (a Swedish business newspaper), where he sees risks and doesn’t rule out that Russia might choose to test NATO’s Article 5 on Swedish territory – now that they feel threatened by NATO’s military buildup.

When Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov spoke to reporters yesterday, he said that the fabricated Russian threat is being used to pressure Western taxpayers for money.

– European taxpayers will spend their money to defuse some threat that they say comes from our country, but it is nothing but an ephemeral threat. This is the technique used to continue pumping out money and supplying Ukraine with weapons.

It was likely no coincidence that the Swedish Armed Forces yesterday showcased their new anti-drone system – with equipment from Swedish defense companies Saab and Bofors, among others – specifically on Gotland, Sweden’s largest island, during the Almedalen Week political forum where many representatives of the military-industrial complex are present.

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

Trump’s ambition to end forever wars appears at a standstill

The escalation in the Middle East

The US "anti-war" president, recently recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize, can forget that thought after last night's war of aggression.

Published 22 June 2025
– By Jenny Piper
Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have long been close - a friendship that looks to have cost him the "America First" election promise.
3 minute read

It is ironic that yesterday the Pakistani government formally recommended US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his mediation efforts to end the latest military conflict between Islamabad and New Delhi. Considering that Trump ordered attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan just a few hours later, he can definitely forget about receiving that award. That said, Obama did receive the Peace Prize despite the increase in US military interventions around the world during his time in the White House, so anything is possible.

Trump thus did the dirty work for Israel, which started the problem, and the US will take the blame for the consequences. Smart.

After the attacks, Trump warned Iran that if they do not make peace, more and harsher attacks will follow. Iran, for its part, has already announced that it will not bow down.

Trump has been criticized for his decision to actively enter the war by other US congressmen, some of whom say that the attacks on Iran are grounds for impeaching Trump.

Iran has accused the US of violating international law and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) with its nighttime attacks on important nuclear facilities, while assuring the public that no radioactive contamination has been detected at the sites attacked.

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi has condemned the US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities as a serious violation of international law and writes on X that Tehran reserves all options to respond in accordance with its right to self-defense.

“The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior. The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran’s peaceful nuclear installations. In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defense, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people”.

Iran is now demanding that the UN Security Council hold an emergency meeting, but everyone already knows that this is just a show, as both the US and Israel have carte blanche in this toothless organization.

At the same time, other forces may wake up when third parties allied with Iran want to get involved. Although major powers such as Russia, North Korea, and China, together with neighboring countries in the Middle East, have so far taken a wait-and-see position because Iran has not wanted support, a spokesman for Yemen’s Houthis has already warned that if the US gets involved, the group will attack their warships in the Red Sea.

Another unpleasant thought is the many dormant “cells” around the world that may now be activated, with consequences for ordinary people as well. So all those who are now praising Trump’s “bravery” may find themselves eating their words if they start thinking more long term.

Glenn Diesen, professor at the University of Southeast Norway, sums it up well in a post on X, where he stated that US President Donald Trump has once again dragged the country into a conflict in the Middle East.

“Bush ran on a peace platform against nation-building, Obama promised ‘change’, Biden would ‘bring the adults back’, and Trump would get the US out of the forever wars in the Middle East. They all started wars… It does not matter who you vote for, when they do not work for you”.

But there is at least one winner here: the arms industry, whose shares will once again rise when the stock market opens.

 

Jenny Piper

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.