Wednesday, April 16, 2025
The Nordic Times

Polaris of Enlightenment

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Breaking News
Ad:

https://nordictimes.com/world/supreme-court-rejects-presidential-candidates-covid-lawsuits/

World

Supreme Court rejects presidential candidate’s covid lawsuits

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 25 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is running for president this year.
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

Two COVID-19 vaccine-related lawsuits filed by Children’s Health Defense, the organization founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr, have been rejected by the Supreme Court.

In one case, the organization challenged the US FDA’s emergency approval of covid-19 vaccines in December 2020. The lawsuit was filed with five parents in Texas and specifically challenged the approval of the covid-19 vaccines for children and their “ineffectiveness and lack of adequate review”.

The other lawsuit was filed together with 13 students against Rutgers University in New Jersey in 2021, challenging the covid vaccine requirement for students and arguing that it violates the US Constitution.

In the Texas case, the lawsuit was found to have no legal merit, reports NBC News. In the other case, the court concluded that the plaintiffs had “have not stated any plausible claim for relief”.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who ran for president, is president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense and was also listed as one of the attorneys pushing the appeal in the Rutgers case. The organization is known to be critical of the covid-19 vaccines, but does not describe itself as anti-vaccine in general. It does, however, believe that vaccines should be properly tested and that people should never be forced to take a vaccine.

The organization has an ongoing lawsuit against a number of news organizations, including the Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by, among other things, spreading disinformation about covid-19 vaccines.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

https://nordictimes.com/science/study-deaths-after-covid-vaccine-were-in-most-cases-due-to-the-shot/

Science

Study: Deaths after covid vaccine were in most cases due to the shot

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 12 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Cardiologist Peter McCullough is one of the researchers behind the study.
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

In a new study, doctors infer covid vaccine as a direct or contributing cause in three out of four cases of 325 autopsies reviewed where individuals took the injections before death.

The researchers reviewed a total of 44 scientific articles with a total of 325 autopsy cases found of people who died after being injected with COVID-19 vaccine. To find the articles, search terms such as “COVID-19 Vaccine”, “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine”, “COVID Vaccination”, “Post-mortem” and “Autopsy” were used.

In each case, three independent doctors reviewed the autopsy results to assess whether the COVID vaccine could be the direct cause or a contributing cause of death.

Among others, former cardiologist Peter McCullough is one of the researchers behind the study. McCullough has been a very strong critic of the covid policy including the mass vaccination campaign, and strongly urged, among other things, that people under the age of 50 and those who had the infection did not need to inject themselves with the covid vaccines.

Myocarditis and sudden cardiac death

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Public Health Policy and the Law, shows that in 74% of cases, at least two out of three physicians considered the COVID-19 vaccination to be a direct or contributing cause of death.

The most common causes of death were sudden cardiac death, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, VITT (vaccine-induced thrombosis), myocarditis, inflammatory syndrome and cerebral hemorrhage. Most deaths studied occurred within a week of vaccination.

Commenting on the study, Swedish physician Nils Littorin says the results are striking.

 

Translation of above tweet: “This is BIG! New medical study of autopsied deaths after COVID-19 vaccine shows that 74% of 326 cases were caused by the vaccine.
The heart and vascular system were the most common organ systems to be injured, followed by hematological and respiratory.” 

Call for in-depth studies

According to the authors, the patterns revealed by the study suggest a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and increased mortality, while calling for much more extensive and in-depth studies in this area.

“Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings”, the researchers write.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

https://nordictimes.com/the-nordics/norway/lise-i-followed-the-authorities-advice-it-cost-me-two-years-of-my-life/

Norway

Lise: “I followed the authorities’ advice – it cost me two years of my life”

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 25 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The COVID-19 vaccine made Lise Sørensen's life hell - and she was met with scornful looks and questioning.
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

When Norway shut down under coronavirus restrictions, journalist Lise Sørensen did what most people do – she followed the authorities’ advice and took the recommended injections. Already after the second dose, her health started to falter and the road to hell was clear. When she asked questions about the vaccine, she was met with scornful looks.

During COVID, people were strongly encouraged to inject the vaccine recommended by the authorities. The encouragement was more of an indirect coercion where threats of exclusion in society were constantly lurking. In Norway, podcast host Ole Asbjørn Ness felt that anyone who didn’t take the vaccine should be taxed NOK 50,000 (€4,400).

“I would rather be 50,000 kroner poorer than have two years of my life ruined by the covid vaccine”, writes Lise Sørensen in an opinion piece in the newspaper Document.

Sørensen was 24 years old when the first vaccine arrived and she took it like most other Norwegians. The first dose with Pfizer went off without a hitch, but when she took the second dose with Moderna, things went downhill fast.

“It started immediately. I fainted, got nauseous and had to lie in the waiting room for a long time before I could go home. Hours later, it really started. My fever rose above 40 degrees, my body burned internally and I screamed in pain: ‘This is what it feels like to die'”.

The medical staff told her to just wait and see. The fever broke, but came back and after a week she saw a doctor. The 24-year-old was diagnosed with the Epstein-Barr virus, known as glandular fever, which she had contracted as a child. The theory is that this disease only affects people once in their lives.

“But now it was back – because the vaccine had upset the body’s natural balance. I was not alone in paying the price – I also infected my then partner”.

Two years disappeared

For the next two years, Sørensen was ill, which meant her studies were delayed and her keen interest in running took a hit. When she asked questions about the vaccine, she was met with scornful looks.

“The vaccine was ‘perfectly safe’ and side effects were considered rare isolated incidents. Every time I said I was sick, I got the same look: ‘Oh yes, you’re one of them, right’. There was no room for those who had experienced something different”.

Sørensen points out that the questions she asked back then should have been part of a natural and open dialog, but instead they were labeled as dangerous. As then, and even now, a fixed narrative is followed in society. History has shown us how dangerous it is when critical questions are suppressed, she says.

“This is no longer just about the pandemic or vaccines. It’s about a pattern where those in power control the narrative and marginalize dissent to secure their position. If we don’t ask questions now, it may soon be too late”, she writes and continues:

“Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of an open society. Without it, we lose the ability to challenge power, and without it, what are we left with? Then it is only a matter of time before we live in an authoritarian society”.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

https://nordictimes.com/world/epidemiologist-eight-us-states-may-ban-covid-vaccine/

World

Epidemiologist: Eight US states may ban COVID vaccine

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published 13 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Nicolas Hulscher, epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation.
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

Legislative initiatives to ban COVID-19 vaccines are underway in at least eight US states, according to epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher.

He believes that all the bills and efforts are finally reaching a point where the federal government also feels the need to act.

In the US, many citizens are forced to take the shots in order not to lose their jobs or risk being excluded from society. Since the implementation of mRNA injections, it has come to light that a large number of people in the US and other countries have suffered various suspected side effects from them. In the UK, for example, thousands of people have applied for compensation for side effects related to injuries.

As of February 6, bills and resolutions are being considered at various levels of government in Washington, Idaho, Montana, Texas, Iowa, Tennessee, South Carolina and Florida.

– In the past few years, there have been multiple initiatives, multiple bills, multiple committee hearings, and all of this stuff is actively, and has in the past few years, been drafted up, Hulscher said in an interview with Vigilant News, continuing:

– It’s being considered now by eight states … at various levels of government, including county level and at the state level.

In Idaho, for example, Senator Brandon Shippy has introduced a bill to ban COVID-19 vaccines for the next 10 years. In Washington, 98% of the population has taken the “COVID vaccine” and it is a “very blue state”. Nevertheless, there is currently an initiative at the county level.

“The government must respond”

Hulscher is an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation, which also recently published a study on evidence of the risks of the mRNa vaccine.

“More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines”, states the study, which was published in January in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law,

According to Hulscher, the foundation will be actively involved in at least three of these efforts to ban mRNA injections, though which three he does not name.

– I think these bills eventually, and all these initiatives … will end up reaching a critical mass. And what that means is it’ll reach a certain point to where the federal government will have to respond.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

https://nordictimes.com/world/fired-vaccine-refusers-welcomed-back-into-the-us-army/

World

Fired vaccine refusers welcomed back into the US Army

Donald Trump's USA

Published 28 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Thousands of US military personnel were forced to leave because they did not want to take the shot.
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

Thousands of soldiers were forced to leave the US military because they refused to be injected with the experimental mRNA vaccine during the coronavirus crisis – but now they are being welcomed back.

– We will restore them to their former rank with full pay, Donald Trump promises.

At least 8,200 soldiers were forced to leave the army under the Biden administration in 2021 after refusing to comply with orders to get vaccinated against COVID-19. As early as 2023, notices were sent out to those affected that there were some opportunities to return, but so far only 113 people have chosen to take up that offer.

To be eligible for re-enlistment, soldiers must meet all the requirements for military service, such as weight, physical fitness and medical standards. However, those with a criminal record or other disqualifying factors may be denied, and even officers need to go through a simple reenlistment process.

Donald Trump, during a speech at his Trump National Doral Miami, promised to reinstate all soldiers who were fired because of the vaccine requirement.

– We will offer full reinstatement to any service member who was expelled from the armed forces due to the COVID vaccine mandate, and we will restore them to their former rank with full pay.

Will receive redress

The offer also applies to those who voluntarily left the military to avoid the vaccine requirement, provided they sign an affidavit to that effect. Although the offer is not expected to lead to a large wave of returns, it may increase costs for the military as retroactive pay will have to be paid.

According to data from the various branches of the armed forces, 3,748 marines were discharged, of which 25 have returned. Out of 1,903 dismissed soldiers in the army, 73 have chosen to be reinstated, while 1,878 sailors and 671 air force personnel were dismissed, of which only two and 13 respectively have returned.

– Tens of thousands of service members were kicked out because of an experimental vaccine. They will be apologized to. They will be reinstated, reinstituted with pay and rank, the new US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has previously promised.

Clearing out DEI initiatives

Trump also issued a broad order to eliminate all programs and initiatives related to so-called diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) within the Department of Defense and the Coast Guard, which is governed by the Department of Homeland Security.

The order aims to remove “all vestiges” of such initiatives that seek to “promote a race-based preferences system that subverts meritocracy, perpetuates unconstitutional discrimination, and promotes divisive concepts or gender ideology”.

It prohibits the departments from promoting or adhering to “un-American” theories that suggest the US founding documents are racist or sexist, that discuss gender ideology, and that promote “divisive concepts” such as “race or sex stereotyping”.

Under the order, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security must issue guidance to implement the presidential order within 30 days.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

N

Polaris of Enlightenment

News

Other

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Follow TNT socials!

X-twitter Facebook Telegram Instagram

© 2022-2025 The Nordic Times TNT.
All rights reserved.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Donate

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Donate
Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.